Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 23:4 (2013) ► pp.573–603
On the meanings and functions of grammatical choice
The Spanish first-person plural in written-press discourse
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.4.01aij
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.4.01aij
Grammatical persons and their variable referential scopes play an important role in the configuration of discourse and in the achievement of communicative goals. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the use of the Spanish first-person plural from the viewpoint of morphosyntactic choice and style construction. The study focuses on clauses with unexpressed subjects, which in the case of nosotros ‘we’ are by far the more frequent option. A written-press corpus is analyzed whose materials are distributed into five different textual genres, while participants are characterized through two psychosocial features: Socioprofessional identity and gender. The overall frequencies of first-person plural subjects, as well as the rates of audience-exclusive vs. -inclusive uses, are calculated according to each external factor. Subsequent qualitative analysis shows that the choice of the first-person plural situates discourse in an intermediate zone along the continuum from subjectivity to objectivity, helping to shape an intersubjective perspective, most clearly in its inclusive uses. It is also concluded that the qualitative, interactional facet of linguistic choice is by no means independent of statistical variation patterns: Both types of data contribute to the understanding of morphosyntactic choices as creative stylistic resources.
References (66)
Aijón Oliva, Miguel A. (2006) Variación morfosintáctica e interacción social. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
. (2011) Variación sintáctica y creación de estilos: Los clíticos reflexivos en el discurso. In M.J. Serrano (ed.), Variación variable. Almería: Círculo Rojo / Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, pp. 21-56.
Aijón Oliva, Miguel A., and María J. Serrano (2012) Towards a comprehensive view of variation in language: The absolute variable. Language & Communication 321: 80-94.
Albentosa Hernández, José I., and Arsenio J. Moya Guijarro (2000) La reducción del grado de transitividad en la oración del discurso científico en lengua inglesa. Revista Española de Lingüística 301: 445-468.
Almela Pérez, Ramón (2000) ¿Es nosotros el plural de yo
? Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante 141: 9-17.
Badía Margarit, Antoni (1988) La omisión del sujeto en español. In P. Peira (ed.), Homenaje a Alonso Zamora Vicente. Madrid: Castalia, pp. 361-367.
Bello, Andrés (1860) Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Bogotá: Echevarría.
Biber, Douglas (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad (2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blas Arroyo, José L. (2003) ‘Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad, señor González’: Form and function of politic verbal behaviour in face-to-face Spanish political debates. Discourse & Society 141: 395-423.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 71: 585-614. BoP
Cameron, Deborah (1993) Language and sex in the quantitative paradigm. In J. Coates, and D. Cameron (eds.), Women in their Speech Communities. London: Longman, pp. 3-12.
Coates, Jennifer (2011) Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In J. Coates, and P. Pichler (eds.), Language and Gender: A Reader.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 199-223.
Coupland, Nikolas (2007) Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Cock, Barbara (2011) Why we can be you: The use of 1st person plural forms with hearer reference in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2762-2775. BoP
Dorgeloh, Heidrun, and Anja Wanner (2010) Introduction. In H. Dorgeloh, and A. Wanner (eds.), Syntactic Variation and Genre. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-26.
Duszak, Anna (ed.) (2002) Us and Others. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Eckert, Penelope (1989) The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 11: 245-267. BoP
(2000) Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell. BoP
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet (eds.) (2003) Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Farrar, Kimberley, and Mari C. Jones (2002) Introduction. In M.C. Jones, and E. Esch (eds.), Contact-Induced Language Change. An Examination of Internal, External and Non-Linguistic Factors.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-16.
Finegan, Edward, and Douglas Biber (2001) Register variation and social dialect variation: The Register Axiom. In P. Eckert, and J.R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235-267.
García, Erica C. (2009) The Motivated Syntax of Arbitrary Signs: Cognitive Constraints on Spanish Clitic Clustering. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goldberg, Adele E. (1995) Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press. BoP
Haddington, Pentti (2007) Positioning and alignment as activities of stancetaking in news interviews. In R. Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Interaction, Evaluation.Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 283-317.
Helmbrecht, Johannes (2002) Grammar and function of ‘we’. In A. Duszak (ed.), Us and Others. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 31-49.
Heritage, John (2007) Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In N.J. Enfield, and T. Stivers (eds.), Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255-280.
Hirschman, Lynette (1973) Female-male differences in conversational interaction. Paper presented at the
Linguistic Society of America
, San Diego.
Holmes, Janet, and Stephanie Schnurr (2006) ‘Doing femininity’ at work: More than just relational practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 101: 31-51.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott (2003) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed.
Kristiansen, Gitte, and René Dirven (2008) Cognitive sociolinguistics: Rationale, methods and scope. In G. Kristiansen, and R. Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-17. BoP
Labov, William (1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. BoP
(1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press. BoP
. (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. MetBib
Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1978) Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 71: 171-182.
Maltz, Daniel N., and Ruth A. Borker (2011) A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. Coates, and P. Pichler (eds.), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 487-502. First published in J.J. Gumperz (ed., 1982) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 281-312.
Nuyts, Jan (2001) Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Posio, Pekka (2012) Who are ‘we’ in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese? Expression and reference of first person plural subject pronouns. Language Sciences 341: 339-360.
Real Academia Española & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua (2009) Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Richards, Keith (2006) Language and Professional Identity: Aspects of Collaborative Interaction. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rickford, John R., and Penelope Eckert (2001) Introduction. In P. Eckert, and J.R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-18. BoP
Rivarola, José L. (1984) ¿Quién es ‘nosotros’? Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante 21: 201-206.
Satorre Grau, Francisco J. (2002) Revisión del sistema pronominal español. Revista de Filología Española 821: 345-380.
Scheibman, Joanne (2007) Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English conversation. In R. Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Interaction, Evaluation.Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 111-138.
Selting, Margret (2009) Communicative style. In S. D’hondt, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren (eds.), The Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 20-39.
Serrano, María J. (2011) Otras personas y yo: Variación socioestilística de la expresión/omisión del sujeto pronominal nosotros en las conversaciones espontáneas. In M.J. Serrano (ed.), Variación variable. Almería: Círculo Rojo / Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, pp. 93-126.
Serrano, María J., and Miguel A. Aijón Oliva (2011) Syntactic variation and communicative style. Language Sciences 331: 138-153.
(in press) Discourse objectivization, social variation and style in the use of Spanish tú
. Folia Linguistica 471.
Siewierska, Anna (2010) Person forms. In J.J. Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 322-343.
Stewart, Miranda (2001) Pronouns of power and solidarity: The case of Spanish first person plural nosotros
. Multilingua 201: 155-169. BoP
Tannen, Deborah (ed.) (1993) Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Veselý, Vojtěch
Rodríguez García, Óscar Javier
Muñoz, Patricio Moya & María Luisa Carrió-Pastor
2018. Estrategias de intensificación en los comentarios digitales sobre noticias en español. Spanish in Context 15:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
