Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 35:3 (2025) ► pp.369394

References (30)
References
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boo, Ashley, Lee Junwen, and Tan Ying-Ying. 2023. “Particle Stacking in Singlish: New Data from the National Speech Corpus.” Lingua 2871: 103513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1930. “A System of Tone Letters.” Le Maître Phonetique 451: 24–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 1991. “Relevance Theory and the Semantics of Non-Declarative Sentences.” PhD dissertation. University College London.
Davis, Christopher. 2009. “Decisions, Dynamics and the Japanese Particle Yo.” Journal of Semantics 261: 329–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gan, Lee Meng. 2000. “A Study of the ‘Hah’ and ‘Hor’ Particles in Colloquial Singapore English.” Unpublished Honours thesis. National University of Singapore.
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong, Mie Hiramoto, Jakob R. E. Leimgruber, and Jun Jie Lim. 2023. “Is it in Colloquial Singapore English: What Variation Can Tell Us about Its Conventions and Development.” English Today 39 (4): 243–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea Fraser. 1992. “The Pragmatic Particles of Singapore Colloquial English.” Journal of Pragmatics 181: 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Epistemic Modalities and the Discourse Particles of Singapore.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 243–263. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1970. A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1993. “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance-Theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 435–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Chonghyuck, and Lionel Wee. 2009. “Resolving the Paradox of Singapore English Hor.” English World-Wide 301: 241–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koh, Jia Xin, Aqilah Mislan, Kevin Khoo, Brian Ang, Wilson Ang, Charmaine Ng, and Ying-Ying Tan. 2019. “Building the Singapore National Speech Corpus.” In Proceedings of Interspeech 2019, ed. by Gernot Kubin, and Zdravko Kačič, 321–325. Graz: International Speech Communication Association (ISCA). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwan-Terry, Anna. 1978. “The Meaning and the Source of the La and the What Particles in Singapore English.” RELC Journal 91: 22–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ler, Vivien. 2005. “An In-Depth Study of Discourse Particles in Singapore English.” PhD dissertation. National University of Singapore.
Lim, Lisa. 2007. “Mergers and Acquisitions: On the Ages and Origins of Singapore English Particles.” World Englishes 261: 446–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ljungqvist, Marita. 2007. “Le, Guo and Zhe in Mandarin Chinese: A Relevance-Theoretic Account.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 161: 193–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marie, Wilma Vimala. 1987. “A Study of Sentence-Final Particles in Singapore English.” Unpublished academic exercise. National University of Singapore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pakir, Anne. 1992. “Dictionary Entries for Discourse Particles.” In Words in a Cultural Context, ed. by Anne Pakir, 143–152. Singapore: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platt, John T., and Mian Lian Ho. 1989. “Discourse Particles in Singaporean English: Substratum Influences and Universals.” World Englishes 81: 215–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Richards, Jack C., and Mary W. J. Tay. 1977. “The La Particle in Singapore English.” In The English Language in Singapore, ed. by William Crewe, 141–156. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojas-Esponda, Tania. 2014. “A Discourse Model for überhaupt.” Semantics and Pragmatics 71: 1–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 2011. “The Discourse Marker Now: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2110–2129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siraj, Pasha. 2009. “A Formal Semantics for the Singaporean English Discourse Particle Wát.” University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (UMOP) 391: 77–104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1988. “Mood and the Analysis of Non-Declarative Sentences.” In Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value, ed. by Jonathan Dancy, J. M. E. Moravczik, and C. C. W. Taylor, 77–101. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel. 2004. “Reduplication and Discourse Particles.” In Singapore English: A Grammatical Description, ed. by Lisa Lim, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2004. “Relevance Theory.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Lawrence Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, Jock. 2004. “The Particles of Singapore English: A Semantic and Cultural Interpretation.” Journal of Pragmatics 361: 739–793. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue