Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 35:4 (2025) ► pp.529–554

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

China’s real estate agents’ persuasion realizations on WeChat Moments

ORCiD logo with link | Beijing Foreign Studies University | Hanjiang Normal University
 | Beijing Foreign Studies University
Published online: 22 July 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22062.he
Abstract
Persuasion is a well-documented language phenomenon in the fields of rhetoric, communication, and sociopsychology. However, there is still a need for further research into persuasion on social media from a pragmatic perspective. The current research contributes to the existing literature on persuasion, particularly in virtual environments, by examining the tactics of online persuasion with a dataset of 409 excerpts from WeChat Moments. It examines the frequency and percentage of persuasive strategies deployed by fourteen Chinese real estate agents. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of each tactic is conducted, supported by specific examples. The findings indicate that, in increasing order of frequency, persuasion attempts on the participants’ WeChat Moments are primarily realized through rational, ethos, and emotional appeals. The determinants of this strategic inclination are examined with respect to the anonymity afforded by the Internet, media effect, community of practice and Chinese cultural particulars.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Persuasion strategies
    • 2.2Computer-mediated persuasion
    • 2.3Pragmatic study on persuasion
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Source of data
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Data coding
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Persuasion with rational appeals
      • 4.1.1Highlighting gaining
      • 4.1.2Emphasizing scarcity
    • 4.2Persuasion with emotional appeals
      • 4.2.1Negative altercasting
      • 4.2.2Providing social proof
      • 4.2.3Self-mockery
      • 4.2.4Teasing
      • 4.2.5Imposing obligation
      • 4.2.6Evoking positive self-esteem
      • 4.2.7Spreading fear
    • 4.3Persuasion with ethos appeals
      • 4.3.1Displaying liking
      • 4.3.2Applying expertise
      • 4.3.3Showing empathy
      • 4.3.4Self-praise
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The overall tendency towards the option of persuading appeals
    • 5.2The operational mechanism of persuasion in WeChat Moments ads
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (72)
References
Al-Momani, Kawakib Radwan. 2014. “Strategies of Persuasion in Letters of Complaint in Academic Context: The Case of Jordanian University Students’ Complaints.” Discourse Studies 16 (6): 705–728. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Subhi, Aisha Saadi. 2022. “Metadiscourse in Online Advertising: Exploring Linguistic and Visual Metadiscourse in Social Media Advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics 1871: 24–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altikriti, Sahar. 2016. “Persuasive Speech Acts in Barack Obama’s Inaugural Speeches (2009, 2013) and the Last State of the Union Address (2016).” International Journal of Linguistics 8 (2): 47–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgoon, Michael. 1994. “Paths II: The Garden Variety.” Communication Theory 41: 81–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly, and Alice H. Eagly. 1983. “Communication Modality as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Role of Communicator Salience.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (2): 241–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Xi, Gang Li, YunDi Hu, and Yujie Li. 2016. “How Anonymity Influence Self-Disclosure Tendency on Sina Weibo: An Empirical Study.” Anthropology 261: 217–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cherry, Roger D. 1988. “Politeness in Written Persuasion.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 63–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B. 2007. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Influence: Science and Practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Citera, Maryalice. 1998. “Distributed Teamwork: The Impact of Communication Media on Influence and Decision Quality.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (9): 792–800. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cockroft, Robert, and Susan Cockroft. 2005. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dafouz-Milne, Emma. 2008. “The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the Construction and Attainment of Persuasion: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Newspaper Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 95–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria. 2014. “Self-Praise in Microblogging.” Journal of Pragmatics 611: 91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubrovsky, Vitaly J., Sarah Kiesler, and Beheruzu N. Sethna. 1991. “The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups.” Human Computer Interaction 6 (2):119–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dutchler, Kirk William. 2001. “The Influence of Peripheral Cues on the Processing of Persuasive Messages on the World Wide Web.” PhD dissertation. University of Kentucky.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. “Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology 211: 461–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foss, Sonja K., and Cindy L. Griffin. 1995. “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric.” Communication Monographs 62 (1): 2–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
French, John. R. P., and Bertram Raven. 1960. “The Bases of Social Power.” In Group Dynamics, ed. by Dorwin Cartwright, and Alvin Zander, 251–260. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, Robert H., and John S. Seiter (eds). 2016. Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance-Gaining. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2017. “‘Whose Context Collapse?’: Ethical Clashes in the Study of Language and Social Media in Context.” Applied Linguistic Review 31: 169–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guadagno, Rosanna E., and Robert B. Cialdini. 2002. “Online Persuasion: An Examination of Gender Differences in Computer-Mediated Interpersonal Influence.” Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice. Special Issue on Internet Research 61: 38–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Online Persuasion and Compliance: Social Influence on the Internet and Beyond.” In The Social Net: The Social Psychology of the Internet, ed. by Rosanna E. Guadagno, Rober B. Cialdini, and Yair Amichai-Hamburger, 91–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Jerold L., and James P. Dillard. 1995. “Fear Appeals in Health Promotion Campaigns: Too Much, Too Little, or Just Right?” In Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice, ed. by Edward W. Maibach, and Roxanne L. Parrott, 65–80. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardin, William G., Mingzhi Hu, and Zhenguo Lin. 2023. “Culture, Wealth, Gender, Real Estate, and Consumption in China: It’s a Boy.” Journal of Estate Research 45 (1): 55–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harwit, Eric. 2017. “WeChat: Social and Political Development of China’s Dominant Messaging App.” Chinese Journal of Communication 10 (3): 312–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)Affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2106–2119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede, and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Feng Jiang. 2021. “Our Striking Results Demonstrate…: Persuasion and the Growth of Academic Hype.” Journal of Pragmatics 1821: 189–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1972. “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John Gumperz, and Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2006. “Classical Rhetoric.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown, 573–574. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Edwards E. 1964. Ingratiation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman Group Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2008. “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, Ringo, and Rueyling Chuang. 2001. “Persuasion Strategies of Chinese College Students in Interpersonal Contexts.” Southern Communication Journal 66 (4): 267–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2013. “Just Click ‘Like’: Computer-Mediated Responses to Spanish Compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics 511: 47–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marin-Arrese, Juana I. 2021. “Stance, Emotion and Persuasion: Terrorism and the Press.” Journal of Pragmatics 1771: 135–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwell, Gerald, and David R. Schmitt. 1967. “Dimensions of Compliance-Gaining Behavior: An Empirical Analysis.” Sociometry 301: 350–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matheson, Kimberly, and Mark P. Zanna. 1989. “Persuasion as a Function of Self-Awareness in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Social Behaviour 41: 99–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mckenna, Katelyn Y. A., and John A. Bargh. 2000. “Plan 9 from Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology.” Personality & Social Psychology Review 4 (1): 57–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Gerald R., and Michael Burgoon. 1978. “Persuasion Research: Review and Commentary.” Annals of the International Communication Association 2 (1): 29–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulholland, Joan. 2005. Handbook of Persuasive Tactics: A Practical Language Guide. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Natali, Carlo (ed). 2009. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Natsheh, Bayan Robin. 2019. “Social Media as a Tool of Persuasion in Political Marketing: Analyzing the Discourse of Trump’s Tweets during His Presidential Campaign.” MA thesis. Hebron University, Palestine.
Orts, María Ángeles. 2016. “Power Distance and Persuasion: The Tension between Imposition and Legitimation in International Legal Genres.” Journal of Pragmatics 921: 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Michael, and Roxanne Parrott. 1992. Persuasive Communication Campaigns. Boston: Pearson College Division.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poggi, Isabella. 2005. “The Goals of Persuasion.” Pragmatics & Cognition 13 (2): 297–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ran, Yongping. 2011. “当代语用学研究的跨学科多维视野[Multidimensional Features of Contemporary Pragmatics].” Foreign Language Teaching and Research 43 (5): 763–771+801Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rank, Hugh. 1988. Persuasion Analysis: A Companion to Composition. Parkforest: Counter-Propaganda Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ren, Wei, and Yaping Guo. 2020. “Self-Praise on Chinese Social Networking Sites.” Journal of Pragmatics 1691: 179–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohr, MTR. V. 2018. “Persuasion in Smoking Cessation Online: An Interpersonal Pragmatics Perspective.” PhD dissertation. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
Schnurr, Stephanie, and Angela Chan. 2011. “When Laughter Is Not Enough. Responding to Teasing and Self-Denigrating Humour at Work.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 20–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seiler, Michael J., Zhang Yang, and Linlin, Zhao. 2019. “The Effect of Real Estate Ownership on Subjective Wellbeing.” Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 25 (2): 128–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seiter, John S., and Robert H. Gass. 2011. “A Rationale for Studying Persuasion.” In Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance-Gaining, ed. by Robert H. Gass, and John S. Seiter, 1–8. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, Jane, Vitaly Dubrovsky, Sara Kiesler, and Timothy W. McGuire. 1986. “Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 37 (2): 157–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Herbert W. 1976. Persuasion: Understanding, Practice and Analysis. New York: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 639–656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Statista. 2023. “Most Popular Social Networks Worldwide as of October 2023, Ranked by Number of Monthly Active Users.” (Retrieved 16-12-2023 via [URL])
Tracy, Karen, and Jessica S. Robles. 2013. Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Herck, Rebecca, Sofie Decock, and Bernard De Clerck. 2020. “‘Can You Send Us a PM Please?’ Service Recovery Interactions on Social Media from the Perspective of Organizational Legitimacy.” Discourse, Context & Media 381: 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari. 2005. “Persuasion across Genres: Emerging Perspectives.” In Persuasion across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–24. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisband, Susanna P. 1992. “Group Discussion and First Advocacy Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision Making Groups.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 531: 352–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, E. Vance. 2003. “Perceived Effectiveness of Interpersonal Persuasion Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Computers in Human Behavior 19 (5): 537–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Xing, He Huang, Ting Jiang, and Yuanpeng, Zou. 2020. “WeChat Usernames: An Exploratory Study of Users’ Selection Practices.” Names 68 (3): 156–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Chuanpeng, Zhengang Zhang, Chunpei Lin, and Yenchun Jim Wu. 2020. “Can Data-Driven Precision Marketing Promote User Ad Clicks? Evidence from Advertising in WeChat Moments.” Industrial Marketing Management 881: 411–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Lei, and Carlton Clark. 2019. Affect, Emotion, and Rhetorical Persuasion in Mass Communication. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue