Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 34:3 (2024) ► pp.347–366

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Modal particles in ironic utterances

A common-ground approach to pretended surprise in verbal irony

ORCiD logo with link | Universität Kassel
 | Universität Kassel
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 4 July 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22035.har
Abstract
This study contributes to theorizing about the semantic characteristics of verbal irony. Specifically, we investigate the function of the modal particles ja (lit. ‘yes’) and aber (lit. ‘but’) that often occur in ironic utterances in German, cf. Das war aber ein aufregender Film (‘That was prt a thrilling movie’). Our main claim is that modal particles are used in ironic utterances to reflect the speaker’s intention to pretend surprise and produce a mockery effect by manifesting the utterance as an echo. Modal particles require some mutual knowledge to be contained in the common ground, and we link this notion to the interplay between echoic mention and pretense in interpreting an utterance as ironic. In an empirical approach to our claim, we report on results from an online questionnaire study, in which we test whether the presence of a modal particle leads to a higher perception of pretense in ironic reactions. While the data generally confirm our prediction, we found that only aber affects pretense perception but not ja, which can be explained by the former’s contrastive nature. The view we pursue implies that attitudinal content is a graded feature and that such a notion is applicable to surprise and pretense involved in verbal irony.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Semantic–pragmatic features of ironic utterances
    • 2.1Non-literal and attitudinal content of ironic utterances
    • 2.2Echoic mention and pretense in ironic utterances
  • 3.Modal particles in ironic utterances
    • 3.1Mirativity in ironic utterances
    • 3.2Mirative particles and the background proposition
    • 3.3Mockery and evaluative attitude
    • 3.4Hypothesized effect of mirative particles in ironic utterances
  • 4.Experimental study
    • 4.1Method
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Material and design
      • 4.1.3Procedure
    • 4.2Results
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (45)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2017. “Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte.” In Grammatische Funktionen aus Sicht der japanischen und deutschen Germanistik [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 24], ed. by Shin Tanaka, Elisabeth Leiss, Werner Abraham, and Yasuhiro Fujinawa, 76–108. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alm, Maria, Janina Behr, and Kerstin Fischer. 2018. “Modal Particles and Sentence Type Restrictions: A Construction Grammar Perspective.” Glossa 31: 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000. “Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhol, Jennifer Hay, and Isabella Poggi. 2003. “Multimodal Markers of Irony and Sarcasm.” Humor 161: 243–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 1984. “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1131: 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert L., and Shaune B. Keller. 1998. “You’ll Never Believe This: Irony and Hyperbole in Expressing Surprise.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 271: 499–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert L., and Shyh-Yuan Lee. 2004. “Gender Differences in Verbal Irony Use.” Metaphor and Symbol 191: 289–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. 2006. “Why Irony is Pretence.” In The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretence, Possibility, and Fiction, ed. by Shaun Nichols, 111–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declercq, Dieter. 2017. “A Philosophy of Satire: Critique, Entertainment, Therapy.” PhD Thesis. University of Kent.
Dews, Shelly, and Ellen Winner. 1999. “Obligatory Processing of Literal and Nonliteral Meanings in Verbal Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 311: 1579–1599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Joan Kepler, and Ellen Winner. 1995. “Why Not Say It Directly? The Social Functions of Irony.” Discourse Processes 191: 347–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Kerstin Fischer. 1998. “Zur diskursiven und modalen Funktion der Partikeln ‘aber’, ‘auch’, ‘doch’ und ‘ja’ in Instruktionsdialogen.” Linguistica 381: 75–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2007. “Grounding and Common Ground: Modal Particles and Their Translation Equivalents.” In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Kerstin Fischer, 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Herbert L. Colston. 2007. Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1995. “On Irony and Negation.” Discourse Processes: 191: 239–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Härtl, Holden. 2018. “Name-Informing and Distancing ‘Sogenannt’ (‘So-Called’). Name Mentioning and the Lexicon-Pragmatics Interface.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 371: 139–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Härtl, Holden, and Tatjana Bürger. 2021. “‘Well, That’s Just Great!’ – An Empirically Based Analysis of Non-Literal and Attitudinal Content of Ironic Utterances.” Folia Linguistica 551: 361–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Härtl, Holden, and Heiko Seeliger. 2019. “Is a So-Called ‘Beach’ a Beach? An Empirically Based Analysis of Secondary Content Induced by Ironic Name Use.” In Secondary Content: The Linguistics of Side Issues, ed. by Daniel Gutzmann, and Katharina Turgay, 200–221. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, and Hella Olbertz. 2012. “Mirativity Does Exist!” Linguistic Typology 161: 487–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1999. The Meaning of ‘Ouch’ and ‘Oops’: Explorations in the Theory of Meaning as Use. Unpublished Ms. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapogianni, Eleni. 2016. “The Ironic Operation: Revisiting the Components of Ironic Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 911: 16–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karagjosova, Elena. 2003. “Modal Particles and the Common Ground: Meaning and Functions of German ‘ja’, ‘doch’, ‘eben’/‘halt’ and ‘auch’.” In Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millenium, ed. by Peter Kühnlein, Hannes Rieser, and Henk Zeevat, 335–349. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraus, Kelsey N. 2018. “Great Intonations.” PhD Thesis. UC Santa Cruz.
Kreuz, Roger, and Sam Glucksberg. 1989. “How to Be Sarcastic: The Echoic Reminder Theory of Verbal Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1181: 364–386.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger, and Kristen Link. 2002. “Asymmetries in the Use of Verbal Irony.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 211: 127–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J. 2020. Irony and Sarcasm. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroll, Margaret, and Tom Roberts. 2019. “Stating the Obvious: ‘Of Course’ as a Focus-Sensitive Marker of Uncontroversiality.” Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 231. 37–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg, and Mary Brown. 1995. “How about Another Piece of Pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 1241: 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2007. “Syngrapheme als pragmatische Indikatoren: Anführung und Auslassung.” In Von der Pragmatik zur Grammatik, ed. by Sandra Döring, and Jochen Geilfuß-Wolfgang, 21–37. Leipzig: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minitab, L. L. C. 2020. Minitab 19 [computer software]. Retrieved from [URL]
Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela. 2014. “Pretence and Echo: Towards an Integrated Account of Verbal Irony.” International Review of Pragmatics 61: 127–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Expressive Dimension.” Theoretical Linguistics 331: 165–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Predelli, Stefano. 2003. “Scare Quotes and Their Relation to Other Semantic Issues.” Linguistics and Philosophy 261: 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie. 2013. “Common Ground Management: Modal Particles, Illocutionary Negation and VERUM.” In Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning, ed. by Daniel Gutzmann, and Hans-Martin Gärtner, 231–274. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2011. “Exclamatives, Degrees and Speech Acts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 341: 411–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rockwell, Patricia. 2000. “Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291: 483–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlechtweg, Marcel, and Holden Härtl. 2023. “Quotation Marks and the Processing of Irony in English: Evidence from a Reading Time Study.” Linguistics 61 (2): 355–390 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, E. Allyn, and Kathleen Currie Hall. 2011. “Projection Diversity: Experimental Evidence.” In Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2011 Workshop on Projective Content. 156–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1981. “Irony and the Use–Mention Distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 1161: 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Irony Comprehension: A Developmental Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 591: 40–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 1992. “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 871: 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte. 2011. “Discourse Particles.” In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning – Vol. 2, ed. by Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn, and Paul Portner, 2011–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Trotzke, Andreas
2024. Towards a social syntax. Journal of Pragmatics 234 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue