Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 34:2 (2024) ► pp.161–189

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Delving into suggestion speech acts in Chinese authoritative academic discourse

A cognitive pragmatic perspective

ORCiD logo with link | Dalian University of Foreign Languages
ORCiD logo with link | Dalian University of Technology
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 15 May 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22022.li
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the realisation of suggestions in authoritative academic discourse through the lens of cognitive pragmatics. To date, the majority of academic suggestion research has focused on face-to-face interactions in an institutional context. However, other forms of suggesting, namely the written forms of academic suggestions have not yet been sufficiently explored. Thus, there is a knowledge gap when it comes to authoritative academic suggestions directed to policy makers. Such policy maker-directed suggestions are always bound and embedded in particular cultural contexts. As a case study, we explore the suggestions in authoritative academic discourse with the focus on illocutionary force indicating devices (IFIDs) and relevant construal strategies. Our data were drawn from the Blue Book of Ecological Governance (China Ecological Governance development report 2019–2020), an important manifestation of authoritative academic discourse in China. The findings indicate that three types of IFIDs are deployed to delimit Chinese authoritative academic suggestions, among which conventionalised and indirect IFIDs are preferred. Notably IFID tools pertain to speakers’ choices of construal strategies for building up the infrastructure of suggestions. The operation of these strategies reveals how authoritative academic suggestions are internally coded, as well as how they are built to externally act on. Furthermore, we argue that the speakers’ choices of construal strategies imply a degree of politeness. The study may shed light upon speech act and politeness research in Chinese linguaculture.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Suggestions
    • 2.2Academic suggestions
    • 2.3Pragmatic strategies
  • 3.Analytic framework
  • 4.Data and method
    • 4.1Data
    • 4.2Method
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1IFIDs
    • 5.2The construal strategies
      • 5.2.1Explicitness
      • 5.2.2Perspectivity
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (68)
References
Alston, William P. 1994. “Illocutionary Acts and Linguistic Meaning.” In Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Savas L. Tsohatzidis, 29–49. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, Paddy. 1990. “Politeness Revisited – The Dark Side.” In New Zealand Ways of Speaking English, ed. by Allan Bell, and Janet Holmes, 277–293. Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banerjee, Janet, and Patricia L. Carrell. 1988. “Tuck in Your Shirt, You Squid: Suggestions in ESL.” Language Learning 38 (3): 313–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, and Beverly S. Hartford. 1996. “Input in an Institutional Setting.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (2): 171–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnahan, Mary. 1992. “The Effects of Advisor Style on Overcoming Client Resistance in the Advising Interview”. Discourse Processes 15 (2): 229–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christensen, Johan. 2018. “Economic Knowledge and the Scientization of Policy Advice.” Policy Sciences 51 (3): 291–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeCapua, Andrea, and Joan Findlay Dunham. 2012. “‘It Wouldn’t Hurt If You Had Your Child Evaluated’: Advice to Mothers in Responses.” In Advice in Discourse, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Holger Limberg, 73–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeCapua, Andrea, and Lisa Huber. 1995. “‘If I Were You…’: Advice in American English.” Multilingua 14 (2): 117–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dinsmore, John. 1991. Partitioned Representations. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspect of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Reprinted 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1980. “Spilling the Beans on Understanding and Memory for Idioms in Conversation.” Memory & Cognition 8 (2): 149–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillingham, Philip. 2019. “From Bureaucracy to Technocracy in a Social Welfare Agency: A Cautionary Tale.” Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development 29 (2): 108–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gizzi, Michael C., and Stefan Rädiker, eds. 2021. The Practice of Qualitative Data Analysis: Research Examples Using MAXQDA. Berlin: MAXQDA Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Daena J. 2004. Communicating Social Support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Daena J., and Kristine Fitch. 1997. “The Normative Context of Advice as Social Support.” Human Communication Research 23 (4): 454–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Edward, and Merle Goldman. 2004. “Introduction: The Transformation of the Relationship between Chinese Intellectuals and the State.” In Chinese Intellectuals between State and Market, ed. by Edward X. Gu, and Merle Goldman, 1–18. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graumann, Carl F., and Michael C. Sommer. 1988. “Perspective Structure in Language Production and Comprehension.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7 (3–4): 193–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis J., and Juliane House. 1981. Let’s Talk, and Talk about It: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hámori, Ágnes. 2010. “Illocutionary Force, Salience and Attention Management – A Social Cognitive Pragmatic Perspective.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57 (1): 53–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Shanhua, and Tiaoyuan Mao. 2020. “Can the Research on Language Planning Be Also Planned?: Recent Academia-Government Interactions In China.” Current Issues in Language Planning 21 (4): 434–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henricson, Sofie, and Marie Nelson. 2017. “Giving and Receiving Advice in Higher Education. Comparing Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish Supervision Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 1091: 105–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higuchi, Koichi. 2016. KH Coder 3 Reference Manual. Kioto (Japan): Ritsumeikan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Academic Discourse.” In Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ken Hyland, and Brian Paltridge, 171–184. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Fiona Hyland. 2012. “‘You Could Make This Clearer’: Teachers’ Advice on ESL Academic Writing.” In Advice in Discourse, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Holger Limberg, 53–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Peter M. 2007. “Making Sense of Policy Advice.” Public Money and Management 27 (4): 257–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuckartz, Udo. 2014. Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. “Subjectification.” Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Concept, Image and Symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. “Discourse in Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Eden Sum-hung. 2010. “Making Suggestions: A Contrastive Study of Young Hong Kong and Australian Students.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 598–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Qun, and Fawen Yu. 2019. Blue Book of Ecological Governance. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Fengguang, Shi, Wenrui, and Yaochen Deng. 2019. “A Contrastive Study of Chinese and American Political Speech Act of Advising – Taking Diplomatic Discourse as an Example.” Foreign Language Education 401: 44–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. 2011. “Epistemic Legitimizing Strategies, Commitment and Accountability in Discourse.” Discourse Studies 13 (6): 789–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, Alicia. 2005. “A Theoretical Review of the Speech Act of Suggesting: Towards a Taxonomy for Its Use in FLT.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 181: 167–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 1993. “Epistemic Modal Adverbs and Adjectives and the Layered Representation of Conceptual and Linguistic Structure.” Linguistics 31 (5): 933–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “The Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach.” Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (1): 135–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna. 2000. “On Speech-Act Modality.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (5): 519–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pattyn, Valérie, Sonja Blum, Ellen Fobé, Mirjam Pekar-Milicevic, and Marleen Brans. 2022. “Academic Policy Advice in Consensus-Seeking Countries: The Cases of Belgium and Germany.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 88 (1): 26–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2006. “Academic Advice to Practitioners – What Is Its Nature, Place and Value Within Academia?” Public Money and Management 26 (4): 257–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, José, and Gisela Redeker. 1996. “Perspective and the Representation of Speech and Thought in Narrative Discourse.” In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, ed. by Gilles Fauconnier, and Eve Sweetser, 290–317. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, José, and Wilbert Spooren. 1997. “Perspective, Subjectivity, and Modality from a Cognitive Linguistic Point of View.” In Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker, and Linda R. Waugh. Amsterdam: John Benjamins publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2001. “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (12): 1791–1814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2012. Cognitive Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976. “The Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharoff, Serge, Reinhard Rapp, Pierre Zweigenbaum, and Pascale Fung. 2013. Building and Using Comparable Corpora. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stadler, Stefanie Alexa. 2011. “Coding Speech Acts for Their Degree of Explicitness.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (1): 36–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, Naoko, Loretta Fernández, and Yuechun Jiang. 2021. “Systemic Functional Linguistics Applied to Analyze L2 Speech Acts: Analysis of Advice-giving in a Written Text.” In New Directions in Second Language Pragmatics, ed. by J. César Félix-Brasdefer, and Rachel L. Shively, 27–57. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12 (1): 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. “Pragmatic Macro-structures in Discourse and Cognition.” Retrieved from: [URL]
Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2009. “Student-initiated Advice in Academic Supervision.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 163–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2007. “Construal and Perspectivisation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 48–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisser, Martin. 2010. “Annotating Dialogue Corpora Semi-automatically: A Corpus-linguistic Approach to Pragmatics.” Unpublished Post-doctoral Dissertation, University of Bayreuth.
Wiebe, Janyce. 1990. “Identifying Subjective Characters in Narrative.” In Proceedings of COLING 90, 401–406. Retrieved from: [URL].
Wu, Shuqiong, and Jing Huo. 2016. “A Cognitive Research of No-Subject Sentences in Chinese Legislative Texts.” Foreign Language and Literature Studies 331: 266–271.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zha, Qiang. 2012. “Intellectuals, Academic Freedom, and University Autonomy in China.” In University Governance and Reform. Policy, Fads, and Experience in International Perspective, ed. by Hans G. Schuetze, William Bruneau, and Garnet Grosjean, 209–224. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Shouhui, and Guowen Shang. 2016. “Language Planning Agency in China: From the Perspective of the Language Academies.” Current Issues in Language Planning 17 (1): 23–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam & Anna Siyanova-Chanturia
2025. How are suggestions formulated in Saudi Arabia and New Zealand?. Language and Dialogue 15:3 ► pp. 380 ff. DOI logo
Çiftçi, Hatime
2025. Suggestions in digital discourse: The case of MOOC reviews. Journal of Pragmatics 247 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam & Mervat M. Ahmed
2024. The realization of the speech act of suggestion in Alexandrian and Najdi Arabic: a variational pragmatic study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue