Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 22:3 (2012) ► pp.501–534

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Overcoming the post-structuralist methodolocial deficit – metapragmatic markers and interpretive logics in a critique of the Bologna process

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2012
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.3.07zie
This paper argues for an integration of post-structuralist and linguistic pragmatic perspectives on discourse as a response to the post-structuralist methodological deficit. In order to make his argument, the author presents and illustrates the logics approach to discourse, subjectivity and hegemony as presented by Jason Glynos and David Howarth. This post-structuralist approach constitutes a response to the methodological deficit that haunts much of post-structuralist discourse theory. Nevertheless, it does not provide a linguistic toolbox for analysis. Zienkowski argues that the logics approach can be brought to bear on empirical analysis through the notion of metapragmatic markers. These are linguistic tools that allow us to investigate the self-interpretations of individuals. The practical relevance of using metapragmatic markers in the identification of interpretive logics will be illustrated by means of an analysis of a critical response to the implementation of the Bologna process in Germany. Zienkowski studies Dietrich Lemke’s critical article called Mourning Bologna published in a special issue of E-flux journal n° 14 devoted to the Bologna process. More specifically, he investigates how Lemke constructs his critical stance. Throughout this process, Zienkowski proposes an interpretive and functionalist heuristic for identifying the interpretive logics operative in his text by means of a functional analysis of metapragmatic markers. He concludes with an argument for integrating both perspectives while emphasising that any articulation of post-structuralist and linguistic pragmatic theories of discourse involves some significant reconsiderations with respect to the indexical and differential theories of meaning that characterise each perspective respectively.
References (62)
Angermüller, Johannes (2007) Was fordert die Hegemonietheorie? Zu den Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ihrer methodischen Umsetzung. In Martin Nonhoff (ed.), Diskurs - radikale Democratie - Hegemonie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, pp. 170–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008) From discourse theory to discourse analysis. Doing Discourse Analysis Workshop (Denmark), 6. Manuscript.
(2011) From the many voices to the subject positions in anti-globalization discourse: Enunciative pragmatics and the polyphonic organization of subjectivity. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2992–3000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barros, Sebastian, and Gustavo Castagnola (2000) The political frontiers of the social: Argentine politics after Peronist populism (1955-1973). In David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis(eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. London/New York: Manchester University Press, pp. 24–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual review of anthropology 191: 59–88.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2005) Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowman, Glenn (1994) ‘A country of words’: Conceiving the Palestinian nation from the position of exile. In Ernesto Laclau (ed.), The making of political identities. London: Verso, pp. 138–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram, and Axel Hubler (eds.) (2007) Metapragmatics in use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (2000) Dynamic conclusions. In Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality. London: Verso, pp. 263–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, and Ernesto Laclau (2004) Appendix I: The uses of equality. In Simon Critchley, and Oliver Marchart(eds.), Laclau: A critical reader. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 329–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek (eds.) (2000) Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, C. (1998) Metapragmatics. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 581–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel (2002) Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daryl Slack, Jennifer (1996) The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 112–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Lilie Chouliaraki (1999) Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent (2001) Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. (2008 edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and Yannis Stavrakakis (2004) Encounters of the real kind: Sussing out the limits of Laclau’s embrace of Lacan. In Simon Critchley, and Oliver Marchart(eds.), Laclau: A critical reader. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 201–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and Davod Howarth (2007) Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griggs, Steven, and David Howarth (2000) New environmental movements and direct action protest: The campaign against Manchester Airport’s second runway. In David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis(eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies, and social change. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press, pp. 52–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossberg, Lawrence (1986a) History, politics and postmodernism. In David Morley, and Kuan-Hsing Chen (eds.), Stuart Hall: critical dialogues in cultural studies. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 151–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986b) On postmodernism and articulation: An interview with Stuart Hall. In David Morley, and Kuan-Hsing Chen (eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 131–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howarth, David (2000) Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation. In David Howarth, and Jacob Torfing(eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 316–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howarth, David, and Jacob Torfing (eds.) (2005) Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howarth, David, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis (eds.) (2000) Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yan (2007) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hübler, Axel, and Wolfram Bublitz(2007) Introducing metapragmatics in use. In Wolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler (eds.), Metapragmatics in use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–26.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken (2000) Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language awareness 9.4: 179–97.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasinski (2004a) Metalanguage: Why now? In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasinski(eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–10.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasinzki (eds.) (2004b) Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut, and Eija Suomela-Salmi (2011) Énonciation. In Jan Zienkowski, Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 71–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto (1989) Preface. In Slavoj Žižek (ed.), The sublime object of ideology. London/New York: Verso, ix-xv.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994a) Why do empty signifiers matter to politics?. In Ernesto Laclau (ed.), Emancipation(s). London: Verso, pp. 36–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) (1994b) The making of political identities. London: Verso, pp. 296.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000a) Constructing universality. In Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency, hegemony universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso, pp. 281–307.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b) Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso, pp. 44–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso, pp.198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maeße, Jens (2010) Die vielen Stimmen des Bologna-Prozesses: zur diskursiven Logik eines bildungspolitischen Programms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLaren-Hankin, Yvonne (2008) We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year: Hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases. Discourse studies 10.5: 635–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noh, Eun-Ju (2000) Metarepresentation: A relevance-theory approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Douglas (2006) Introducing performative pragmatics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roulet, E. (1996) Polyphony. Handbook of pragmatics online. <[URL]>, Accessed 22 / 06 / 2009 .
Saleel, Renata (1994) The crisis of identity and the struggle for new hegemony in the former Yugoslavia. In Ernesto Laclau (ed.), The making of political identities. London: Verso, pp. 205–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis (1999) Lacan and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob (1999) New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) Discourse theory: Achievements, arguments, and challenges. In David Howarth, and Jacob Torfing(eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hecke, Tine (2002) Emile Benveniste. Handbook of pragmatics online. <[URL]>, Accessed 15 / 06 / 2010 .
Verschueren, Jef (1999) Understanding pragmatics. (2003 edn.). London: Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasinski(eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009) Introduction: The pragmatic perspective. In Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Key notions for pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–27.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011) Ideology in language use: Pragmatic guidelines for empirical research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson Todd, Richard (2005) A fuzzy approach to discourse topics. Semiotica 155.1: 93–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wetherell, Maragaret (1998) Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9.3: 387–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan (2011a) Discursive pragmatics: A platform for the pragmatic study of discourse. In Jan Zienkowski, Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011b) Analysing political engagement: An interpretive and functionalist discourse analysis of evolving political subjectivities among public activists and intellectuals with a Moroccan background in Flanders. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Antwerp.
Zienkowski, Jan, Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.) (2011) Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj (1995) The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000) Class struggle or postmodernism? Yes, please!. In Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Contingency, hegemony universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso, pp. 90–135.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
2021. Moving discourse theory forward. Journal of Language and Politics 20:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, Craig Love, Konstantinos Roussos & Jimena Vazquez
2021. Logics, discourse theory and methods. Journal of Language and Politics 20:1 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Madsen, Dorte
2018. Conspicuous by Presence: The Empty Signifier ‘Interdisciplinarity’ and the Representation of Absence. In Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse, ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Mark & Hugh Willmott
2016. The social potency of affect: Identification and power in the immanent structuring of practice. Human Relations 69:2 ► pp. 483 ff. DOI logo
Zienkowski, Jan
2015. Marking a sense of self and politics in interviews on political engagement. Journal of Language and Politics 14:5 ► pp. 665 ff. DOI logo
Duchastel, Jules & Danielle Laberge
2014. Au delà de l’opposition quantitatif/qualitatif. Convergence des opérations de la recherche en analyse du discours. Corela :HS-15 DOI logo
Van Brussel, Leen
2014. A Discourse-Theoretical Approach to Death and Dying. In The Social Construction of Death, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. , DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue