Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 22:3 (2012) ► pp.355–369

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Smoothing the rough edges

Towards a typology of disclaimers in research articles

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2012
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.3.01abd
Disclaimers are generally defined as devices employed to ward off and defeat doubts and negative typifications which may result from intended conduct (Hewitt & Stokes 1975). In academic prose, writers also take advantage of disclaimers to remove any probable infelicities that could occur as a result of their research or language choices in an attempt to promote the precision and persuasive power of their text. In order to develop a clearer understanding of disclaiming in research articles (RAs), a sample of 120 RAs was selected to identify and discuss different types of disclaimers. The qualitative analysis of the corpus led to introduce six disjunctive types of disclaimers employed by writers of RAs: overt vs. covert, excluder vs. includer, internal vs. external, antecedent vs. subsequent, warning vs. clarification, and local vs. global. Each has been discussed with reference to authentic examples from various journals. Furthermore, a list of formal varieties is developed along with an opinion of what they typically target and where they tend to occur. The paper concludes with a definition of disclaimers in RAs.
References (33)
Abdi, Reza (2002) Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies 4.2: 139–145.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009) The distribution and nature of metadiscourse markers in English and Persian research articles. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Isfahan: Isfahan University.
Abdi, Reza, Manoochehr T. Rizi, and Mansoor Tavakoli (2010) The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 1669–1679.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ädel, Annelie (2006) Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadel phia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Robert, Christopher J. Zahn, and Robert Hopper (1984) Disclaiming: A test of two competing views. Communication Quarterly 321: 28–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan (1988) Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 111: 1–34.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson (1978) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crismore, Avon (1989) Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Trine (2008) Contributing to the academic conversation: A study of new knowledge claims in economics and linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1184–1201.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dodge, Tonya, and Annette Kaufman (2007) What makes consumers think dietary supplements are safe and effective? The role of disclaimers and FDA approval. Health Psychology 26.4: 513–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El-Alayli, Amani, Christoffer J. Myers, Tamara L. Petersen, and Amy L. Lystad (2008) “I don’t mean to sound arrogant, but …” The effects of using disclaimers on person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 341: 130–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erickson, Bonnie, E. Allan Lind, Bruce C. Johnson, and William M. O’Barr (1978) Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 141: 266–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guinda, Carmen S. (2003) Contractual role of modality as convergence strategy in technical research articles. RESLA 161: 219–233.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewitt, John P., and Randal Stokes (1975) Disclaimers. American Sociological Review 401: 1–11.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken (1998) Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 301: 437–455.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7.2: 173–192.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007) Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics 28.2: 266–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010) Community and individuality: Performing identity in applied linguistics. Written Communication 27.2: 159–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse (2004) Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25.2: 156–177.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurinski, James John (2005) Disclaimers of real estate in estate planning. Real Estate Taxation 32.2: 87–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba (2005) Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 241: 269–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, Dimitra (2006) Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51: 19–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann, and George Yule (2001) Formulaic disclaimers. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 45–60.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Francoise (1994) Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13.2: 149–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant (2002) The language of likelihood in genetic counseling discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21.1: 7–31.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silver, Mark (2003) The stance of stance: A critical look at ways stance is expressed and modeled in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2.4: 359–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J. (1985) Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 361: 82–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varttala, Teppo (1999) Remarks on the communicative function of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. Journal of English for Specific Purposes 18.2: 177–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vassileva, Irena (2001) Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 201: 83–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wicks, John Leblanc, Ron Warren, Ignatius Fosu, and Robert Wicks (2009) Dual-modality disclaimers, emotional appeals, and production techniques in food advertising airing during programs rated for children. Is there a good balance? Journal of Advertising 38.4: 93–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Ian A. (1999) Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes 181: 347–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Joseph M. (1981) Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zarei, Golamreza, and Sara Mansoori (2007) Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive analysis of English and Persian research articles. The Asian ESP Journal 3.2: 24–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

McKeown, Jamie & Hans J. Ladegaard
2020. Exploring dominance-linked reflexive metadiscourse in moderated group discussions. Journal of Pragmatics 166 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 september 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue