Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 34:1 (2024) ► pp.109–133

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Transcending the senpai ‘senior’/kōhai ‘junior’ boundary through cross-speaker repetition in Japanese

ORCiD logo with link | Rikkyo University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 20 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21063.mac
Abstract
This study explores the role of cross-speaker repetition in creating interpersonal connections between interactants in Japanese. The analysis focuses on Japanese non-reciprocal conversations between senpai ‘senior’ and kōhai ‘junior’ interactants, where the kōhai are normatively expected to speak using the honorific desu/masu markers. The analysis demonstrates that in such conversations, the kōhai sometimes drop the honorific markers while repeating the senpai’s utterances, thereby momentarily transcending the vertical boundary separating them from the senpai. Two types of plain form repetition are presented: (1) the kōhai repeat the senpai’s funny and/or questionable comments to savor the expressions, and (2) the kōhai repeat the senpai’s ideas, wishes or assessments to synchronize with the senpai. The analysis explicates how cross-speaker repetition allows the kōhai to drop the honorific markers in a way that is acceptable to the senpai. This study underscores the significance of the cross-speaker repetition device for creating harmonious relationships in Japanese.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies
    • 2.1Cross-speaker repetition in Japanese conversations
    • 2.2The honorific desu/masu markers in Japanese
  • 3.Data
  • 4.How cross-speaker repetition creates and enhances bonds between peers
  • 5.How cross-speaker repetition connects interactants in a mild vertical relationship
    • 5.1The kōhai repeat the senpai’s funny and/or questionable comments
    • 5.2The kōhai repeat the senpai’s ideas, wishes or assessments
    • 5.3Summary of the kōhai’s plain form repetition of the senpai’s utterances
  • 6.Discussion – How cross-speaker repetition removes the senpai/kōhai boundary
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Brown, Penelope. 1999. “Repetition.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9 (1–2): 223–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 1999. “Situational Meaning of Japanese Social Deixis: The Mixed Use of the Masu and Plain Forms.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8 (1): 87–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duff, Patricia A. 2014. “Repetition in Foreign Language Classroom Interaction.” In Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction, ed. by Joan Kelly Hall, and Lorrie Stoops Verplaetse, 109–138. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fujii, Yoko. 2012. “Differences of Situating Self in the Place/ba of Interaction between the Japanese and American English Speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (5): 636–662. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “‘Ko o kitai to suru gengo koodoo’ to ‘ba o kitai to suru gengo koodoo’: Eigo, chuugokugo, nihongo, kankokugo, taigo no hikaku yori” [“Agent-based language use and “ba-based language use”: From the discourse perspectives of English, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Thai]. The Japanese Journal of Language in Society 21 (1): 129–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haga, Yasushi. 1962. Kokugo hyoogen kyooshitsu [Japanese expression classroom]. Tokyo: Tookyoodoo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki, and Tsunao Ogino. 1986. “Universals of Linguistic Politeness: Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 101: 347–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1992. “On the Notion of Wakimae: Toward an Integrated Framework of Linguistic Politeness.” Mosaic of Language: Essays in Honor of Professor Natsuko Okuda. Mejiro Linguistic Society (MLS): 298–305.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Roots of the Wakimae Aspect of Linguistic Politeness: Modal Expressions and Japanese Sense of Self.” In Pragmaticizing Understanding: Studies for Jef Verschueren, ed. by Meeuwis, Michael, and Jan-Ola Ostman, 121–138. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikuta, Shoko. 1983. “Speech Level Shift and Conversational Strategy in Japanese Discourse.” Language Science 5 (1): 37–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishida, Kazutoh. 2007. “Developing Understanding of How the Desu/masu and Plain Forms Express One’s Stance.” In Selected Papers from Pragmatics in the CJK the Classroom: The State of the Art, ed. by Dina R. Yoshimi, and Haidan Wang, 97–120. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Minako. 1991. “Iconicity in Discourse: The Case of Repetition.” Text 11 (4): 553–580.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 1987. “An Introduction.” Text 7 (3): 205–214. (Special issue on “Perspectives on Repetition”)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasulis, Thomas P. 2002. Intimacy or Integrity: Philosophy and Cultural Difference. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Elinor. 1974. “Conversational Competence in Children.” Journal of Child Lang 1 (1): 163–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Myung-Hee. 2014. “Why Self-deprecating? Achieving ‘Oneness’ in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 691: 82–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machi, Saeko. 2019. “Managing Relationship through Repetition: How Repetition Creates Ever-shifting Relationships in Japanese Conversation.” Pragmatics 29 (1): 57–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “‘Braid Structure’ Conversations: Development of Informal Triadic Conversation in Japanese.” The Japanese Journal of Language in Society 22 (2): 15–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Cross-speaker Repetition in Japanese: The Development of Conversation and Participant Relationships.” PhD diss. The English Department of the Graduate School of Japan Women’s University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1991. “Pragmatics of Discourse Modality: A Case of Da and Desu/masu Forms in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 151: 551–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Expressive Japanese: A Reference Guide to Sharing Emotion and Empathy. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 1987. “Functions of Repetition in Conversation.” Text 7 (3): 245–264.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko. 1999. “Situated Politeness: Manipulating Honorific and Non-honorific Expressions in Japanese Conversations.” Pragmatics 9 (1): 51–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strauss, Susan, and Yumiko Kawanishi. 1996. “Assessment Strategies in Japanese, Korean, and American English.” Japanese/Korean Linguistics 51: 149–165. Stanford, CA: CSLIGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Nomura, Osamu, Tatsuki Abe, Yuki Soma, Hirofumi Tomita & Hiroshi Kijima
2023. Effect of problem-based learning tutor seniority on medical students’ emotions: an equivalence study. BMC Medical Education 23:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue