Cover not available

Article published In: Concepts and Context in Relevance-Theoretic Pragmatics: New Developments
Edited by Agnieszka Piskorska and Manuel Padilla Cruz
[Pragmatics 33:3] 2023
► pp. 436–459

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Metarepresentational phenomena in Japanese and English

Implications for comparative linguistics

 | Nara University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 16 May 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21061.uch
Abstract
Contrastive studies of languages usually focus on differences in lexical items, syntactic structures, semantic expressions, collocations, and so on. In the present paper we take a cognitive pragmatic approach, assuming that metarepresentation in the sense of , ed. 2000. Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar and Wilson, Deirdre. 2000. “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar offers a crucial perspective in such studies. We discuss how the speech act component of higher-level explicatures is linguistically realized in Japanese and English, focusing on sentence adverbials, ‘because’ clauses, speech act particles, reported speech, private predicates, and desiderative predicates. We conclude that in the Japanese language, information concerning the speech act component tends to be linguistically realized, while such information is not necessarily realized in English. We suggest that this cognitive pragmatic approach can be applied to other languages where higher-level explicatures are basically explicit as in Japanese or implicit as in English.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Realizations of metarepresentations
    • 2.1Metarepresentational adverbials
    • 2.2‘…, because …’ construction
    • 2.3Linguistic realizations of speech acts
  • 3.Realizations of first- and second-order metarepresentations
    • 3.1Reported speech
    • 3.2Metarepresentational information in inflection in Japanese
      • 3.2.1Private predicates
      • 3.2.2Desiderative predicates
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (31)
References
Aoki, Haruo. 1986. “Evidentials in Japanese.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 223–238. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1994. “Echo Questions: A Pragmatic Account.” Lingua 941: 197–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Are Apposition Markers Discourse Markers?” Journal of Linguistics 321: 325–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwata, Seizi. 2003. “Echo Questions.” Linguistics and Philosophy 261: 185–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1973. “Where Epistemology, Style, and Grammar Meet: A Case Study from Japanese.” In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Stephen R. Anderson, and Paul Kiparsky, 377–391. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishiguchi, Sumiyo. 2006. “Fake Past and a Monster.” Stony Brook Occasional Papers in Lingusitics I1: 152–171.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko, and Wenjiang Yang. 2018. “Evidentiality in Japanese.” In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandre Y. Aikhenvald, 709–724. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noh, Eun-Ju. 1995. “A Pragmatic Approach to Echo Questions.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 71: 107–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Echo Questions: Metarepresentation and Pragmatic Enrichment.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (6): 603–628. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Metarepresentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “On Linguistic Communication Based on Resemblance in Form.” Journal of Pragmatics 1861: 20–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1970. “On Declarative Sentences.” In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs, and Peter S. Rosenbaum, 222–272. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutherford, William E. 1970. “Some Observations Concerning Subordinate Clauses in English.” Language 46 (1): 97–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1994. “Understanding Verbal Understanding.” In What is Intelligence? ed. by Jean Khalfa, 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, ed. 2000. Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Metarepresentations in an Evolutionary Perspective.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 117–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Dierdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mindreading.” Mind and Language 171: 3–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uchida, Seiji. 1998. “‘(No)da’ – Kanrensei Riron karano Shiten [‘Noda’ in Relevance Theory].” In Gendai Eigo no Goho to Bunpo [English Usage and Grammar], ed. by the Editorial Board, 243–251. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Goyoron no Shatei [The Scope of Pragmatics]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Kotoba-wo Yomu, Kokoro-wo Yomu: Ninchi Goyoron Nyumon [Reading Words, Reading Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “Metarepresentation kara mita evidentiality [Metarepresentation and Evidentiality].” Memoirs of Nara University 501: 129–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uchida, Seiji, and Eun-Ju Noh. 2018. “Metarepresentational Phenomena in Japanese and Korean.” Memoirs of Nara University 461: 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2000. “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Dierdre, and Dan Sperber. 1993. “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 931: 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue