Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 32:4 (2022) ► pp.537–561

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

The metapragmatics of legal advice communication in the field of immigration law

ORCiD logo with link | Ghent University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 20 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21047.jac
Abstract
Metapragmatic comments are crucial in lawyers’ attempts at managing legal advice communication with asylum seekers. Drawing on linguistic-ethnographic fieldwork in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium, this paper aims to demonstrate how/when/why textual features which tell interactants how to interpret the ongoing speech are used in the context of lawyer-client communication in the field of immigration law. The data analysis reveals how lawyers frame the discursive conditions (i.e. linguistic diversity, the institutional need for efficiency and the presence of emotional lifeworld concerns) of the local interaction in the lawyer’s office. This is necessary as clients are not always acquainted with the discursive routines of the legal consultation, nor aware of its position within the wider chain of discursive asylum events. As many aspects of the legal advice context resemble the interactional conditions of the government-asylum seeker communication, it proves key yet challenging for lawyers to metapragmatically signal their advocating role in a way that enables a relationship of rapport with their client.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Operationalising “metapragmatics”
  • 3.The metapragmatics of managing interaction
  • 4.The metapragmatics of positionality
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (41)
References
Ahmad, Muneer. 2007. “Interpreting Communities: Lawyering across Language Difference.” UCLA Law Review 541: 999–1086.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asylum Information Database. 2019. Comparative Reports. Online: [URL]
Barkai, John, and Virginia Fine. 1982. “Empathy Training for Lawyers and Law Students.” Southwestern University Law Review 131: 505–530.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Balantine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, James Collins, and Stef Slembrouck. 2005. “Spaces of Multilingualism.” Language & Communication 25 (3): 197–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohmer, Carol, and Amy Shuman. 2007. Rejecting Refugees: Political Asylum in the 21st Century. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia. 1998. “Metapragmatics.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. By Jacob Mey, 581–586. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cochran, Robert, John DiPippa, and Martha Peters. 2011. The Counselor-at-law: A Collaborative Approach to Client Interviewing and Counseling. New York: LexisNexis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copland, Fiona, and Angela Creese. 2015. Linguistic Ethnography: Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahlvik, Julia. 2018. Inside Asylum Bureaucracy: Organizing Refugee Status Determination in Austria. Vienna: Springer Open. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dhondt, Benoit. 2021. Kinderen in een migratiecontext. Reflecties uit de praktijk [Sessie 1: Recht]. Retrieved from CESSMIR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eades, Diana. 2010. Sociolinguistics and the Legal Process. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2014. Handbook on European Law relating to Asylum, Borders and Immigration. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gill, Nick. 2016. Nothing Personal? Geographies of Governing and Activism in the British Asylum System. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics: Speech Arts, ed. By Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Was heißt Universalpragmatik? Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hambly, Jessica. 2019. “Interactions and Identities in UK Asylum Appeals: Lawyers and Law in a Quasilegal Setting.” In Asylum Determination in Europe, ed. by Nick Gill, and Anthony Good, 195–218. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hübler, Axel, and Wolfram Bublitz. 2007. “Introducing Metapragmatics in Use.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hübler, Axel. 2011. “Metapragmatics.” In Foundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Neal Norrick, 107–136. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inghilleri, Moira, and Katrijn Maryns. 2019. “Asylum.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, ed. by Mona Baker, and Gabriela Saldanha, 22–27. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Marie, and Katrijn Maryns. 2021. “Managing Narratives, Managing Identities: Language and Credibility in Legal Consultations with Asylum Seekers.” Language in Society, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janney, Richard. 2007. “‘So your Story Now is that ...’: Metapragmatic Framing Strategies in Courtroom Interrogation.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 223–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1985. “Metalanguage as a Linguistic Problem.” In Selected Writings VII, ed. by Stephen Rudy, and Linda Waugh, 113–121. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jubany, Olga. 2011. “Constructing Truths in a Culture of Disbelief: Understanding Asylum Screening from Within.” International Sociology 26 (1): 74–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katzmann, Robert. 2008. “The Legal Profession and the Unmet Needs of the Immigrant Poor.” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 211: 3–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucy, John. 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maryns, Katrijn. 2006. The Asylum Speaker: Language in the Belgian Asylum Procedure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maryns, Katrijn, and Marie Jacobs. 2021. “Data Constitution and Engagement with the Field of Asylum and Migration.” Journal of Pragmatics 1781: 146–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola, Jef Verschueren, and Eline Versluys. 2007. Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penz, Hermine. 2007. “Building Common Ground through Metapragmatic Comments in International Project Work.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 263–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben, Karin Tusting, Janet Maybin, Richard Barwell, Angela Creese, and Lytra Vally. 2004. UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper. Online: [URL]
Reynolds, Judith. 2020. “Investigating the Language-Culture nexus in Refugee Legal Advice Meetings.” Multilingua 39 (4): 395–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Severijns, Ralph. 2019. Zoeken naar zekerheid. Een onderzoek naar de vaststelling van feiten door hoor-en beslismedewerkers van de Immigratie-en Naturalisatiedienst in de Nederlandse asielprocedure. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Mark. 1993. “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” In Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith-Khan, Laura. 2020. “Migration Practitioners’ Roles in Communicating Credible Refugee Claims.” Alternative Law Journal 45 (2): 119–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westaby, Chalen, and Emma Jones. 2018. “Empathy: An Essential Element of Legal Practice or ‘Never the Twain Shall Meet’?” International Journal of the Legal Profession 25(1): 107–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwier, Paul, and Ann Hamric. 1996. “The Ethics of Care and Reimagining the Lawyer-Client Relationship.” Journal of Contemporary Law 221: 383–434.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Bonjour, Saskia
2025. Gatekeepers or agents of change? The political agency of lawyers in the Dutch family migration regime. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Maryns, Katrijn & Marie Jacobs
2025. Refugee languages and the right to interpretation. Translation and Interpreting Studies DOI logo
Remue, Lotte, Floor Verhaeghe, Ilse Derluyn & Katrijn Maryns
2025. “But that’s what I’m saying”: experiential versus institutional truth in guardian-minor interactions. Multilingua 44:5 ► pp. 569 ff. DOI logo
Smith-Khan, Laura
2025. Language, culture and professional communication in migration law education. Language, Culture and Curriculum 38:3 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Stoufflet, Bénédicte
2025. Between ‘I’ and ‘They’: Distributing Authorship for Evidence-Making: How Asylum Lawyers Construct Credible Accounts Before the French Court of Asylum Law. Social & Legal Studies 34:6 ► pp. 814 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Marie
2024. Choosing is losing: language policy and language choice acts at the asylum law firm. Language Policy 23:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Jacobs, Marie & Katrijn Maryns
2023. Mediated disclosure in asylum encounters. Multilingua 42:2 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue