Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 31:4 (2021) ► pp.617–646
The development of interlanguage pragmatic markers in alignment with role relationships
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 23 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20013.xia
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20013.xia
Abstract
Studies on the development of interlanguage pragmatic markers (PMs) have attracted increasing interest recently. However, little research is available on the PM dynamic development in alignment with English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) classroom contexts. Given the lacuna, this article, based on the Complexity and the Alignment theories, investigates how PMs develop and how aligning with film-situated un/equal role relationships influences development. The study with eight data collection points tracks 28 EFL learners’ PM production over around 1.5 year. Results revealed: (1) the employed PM functions fluctuated but developed from singular to multiple, with the interpersonal function use being regressive and the structural and the cognitive, progressive; (2) the PM development manifested a significant gain in aligning with the equal role relationships; and (3) different proficiency learners had dissimilar PM development. These findings corroborate the view of context-dependent dynamic development and provide strong evidence for aligning EFL learning with various role relationships.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Functions of PMs and their dynamic development in EFL studies
- 2.1Functions of PMs and their empirical studies
- 2.2Complexity theory and dynamic development in interlanguage PM studies
- 3.Situational alignment
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Design
- 4.2Participants
- 4.3Materials and tools
- 4.4Procedure
- 4.5Data collection and analysis
- 5.Results
- 5.1The overall picture of interlanguage PM development
- 5.2Dynamic changes and development of interlanguage PM functions
- 5.2.1The frequencies and functions of ‘yeah’
- 5.2.2The frequencies and functions of ‘well’
- 5.2.3The frequencies and functions of ‘you know’
- 5.3The influence of types of role relationships on the learning of interlanguage PMs
- 5.4Differences between the subgroups in the use of interlanguage PMs
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1The dynamic development in the frequencies and functions of interlanguage PMs
- 6.2Influence of types of role relationships on the use of interlanguage PMs
- 6.3Subgroups’ differences in the frequencies and functions of interlanguage PMs
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (45)
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. “Analyzing Modal Adverbs as Modal Particles and Discourse Markers.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, edited by Kirsten Fischer, 89–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2006. “Introduction.” In Pragmatic Markers in Contrast, edited by Karin Aijmer, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, 1–10. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ament, Jennifer, Carmen Pérez-Vidal, and Júlia Barón Parés. 2018. “The Effects of English-medium Instruction on the Use of Textual and Interpersonal Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 28(4):517–545.
Atkinson, Dwight, Eton Churchill, Takako Nishino, and Hanako Okada. 2007. “Alignment and Interaction in a Sociocognitive Approach to Second Language Acquisition.” The Modern Language Journal (91):169–188.
Atkinson, Dwight. 2010. “Extended, Embodied Cognition and Second Language Acquisition.” Applied Linguistics 31(5): 599–622.
Bazzanella, Carla. 2006. “Discourse Markers in Italian: Towards a ‘Compositional’ Meaning.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, edited by Kerstin Fisher, 449–464. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Beeching, Kate. 2015. “Variability in Native and Non Native Use of Pragmatic Markers: the Example of Well in Role-Play Data.” In Researching Sociopragmatic Variation: Perspectives from Variational, Interlanguage and Contrastive Pragmatics, edited by Kate Beeching, and Helen Woodfield, 174–197. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Buysse, Lieven. 2018. “‘It Was a bit Stressy as well Actually’. The Pragmatic Markers Actually and In Fact in Spoken Learner English.” Journal of Pragmatics 11(4):1–13.
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. 2nd Edition. London: Continuum.
Fung, Loretta, and Ronald Carter. 2007. “Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogic Settings.” Applied Linguistics 28(3):410–439.
Gruber, Helmut, and Peter Muntigl. 2005. “Generic and Rhetorical Structures of Texts: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” Folia Linguistica 39 (1/2): 75–113.
Haken, Hermann. 1977. “Synergetics: An Introduction Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self- Organization in Physics, Chemistry and Biology. New York: Springer-Vertlag.
Haupt, Jaromír. 2014. “Contrastive Relations, Evaluation, and Generic Structure in Science News.” In Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence: Theories and applications, edited by Helmut Gruber, and Gisela Redeker, 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Iwasaki, Noriko. 2011. “Filling Social Space with Fillers: Gains in Social Dimension After Studying Abroad in Japan.” Japanese Language and Literature 45 (1):169–193.
. 2013. “Getting over the Hedge: Acquisition of Mitigating Language in L2 Japanese.” In Social and Cultural Aspects of Language Learning in Study Abroad, edited by Celeste Kinginger, 239–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jackson, Jane. 2008. Language, Identity, and Study Abroad: Sociocultural Perspectives. London: Equinox Publishing.
Jones, Christian. 2016. “Teaching Spoken Stance Markers: A Comparison of Receptive and Productive Practice.” The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 5(2), 83–100.
Jones, Christian, and Ronald Carter. 2014. “Teaching Spoken Discourse Markers Explicitly: A Comparison of III and PPP.” International Journal of English Studies 14(2), 37–54.
Kramsch, Claire, and Anne Whiteside. 2008. “Language Ecology in Multilingual Settings. Towards a Theory of Symbolic Competence.” Applied Linguistics 29(4):645–671.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1997. “Chaos/Complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition.” Applied Linguistics 18(2):141–165.
. 2006. “The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English.” Applied Linguistics 27(4):590–619.
. 2017a. “Complexity and ELF” In The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, edited by Jennifer Jenkins, Will Baker, and Martin Dewey, Chapter 4 in Part 1. London: Routledge.
. 2017b. “Complexity Theory: The Lessons Continue.” In Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman, edited by Lourdes Ortega and Zhaohong Han, 11–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2019. “Second Language Development in Its Time: Expanding Our Scope of Inquiry.” Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 42(3):267–284.
Liao, Silvie. 2009. “Variation in the Use of Discourse Markers by Chinese Teaching Assistants in the US.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (7): 1313–1328.
Magliacane, Annarita. 2020. “Erasmus Students in an Irish Study Abroad Context: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Use of ‘well’ and ‘like’” Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 5 (1):89–117.
Magliacane, Annarita, and Martin Howard. 2019. “The Role of Learner Status in the Acquisition of Pragmatic Markers during Study Abroad: The Use of ‘Like’ in L2 English.” Journal of Pragmatics 146 (6):72–86.
McCarthy, Michael. 1998. Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martín-Laguna, Sofía and Eva Alcón-Soler. 2018. “Development of Discourse-pragmatic Markers in the Multilingual Classroom: A Mixed Method Research Approach.” System (75):68–80.
Maschler, Yael. 1994. “Metalanguaging and Discourse Markers in Bilingual Conversation.” Language in Society 23(3):325–366.
Müller, Simone. 2005. Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
National Curriculum. 2004. Introducing the Grammar of Talk. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
Pickering, Martin J., and Simon Garrod. 2004. “Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2): 169–26.
. 2006. “Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication.” Research on Language and Computation 4(2–3): 203–28.
Polat, Brittany. 2011. “Investigation Acquisition of Discourse Markers through a Developmental Learner Corpus.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(15):3745–3756.
Redeker, Gisela. 1990. “Ideational and Pragmatic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (3):367–381.
Taguchi, Naoko. 2011. “Pragmatic Development as a Dynamic, Complex Process: General Patterns and Case Histories.” The Modern Language Journal 95(4): 605–627.
. 2015. “‘Contextually’ Speaking: A Survey of Pragmatic Learning Abroad, in Class, and Online.” System (48): 3–20.
van Geert, Paul, and Henderien Steenbeek. 2005. “Explaining After by Before: Basic Aspects of a Dynamic Systems Approach to the Study of Development.” Developmental Review 25(3–4): 408–42.
Verspoor, Marjolijn, Monika S. Schmid, and Xiaoyan Xu. 2012. “A Dynamic Usage-based Perspective on L2 Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 21(3):239–263.
Wang, Chuming, and Min Wang. 2015. “Effect of Alignment on L2 Written Production.” Applied Linguistics 36(5): 503–526.
Xiao, Hao-Zhang. 2012. “Effects of Explicit Attention to the Learning of Discourse Markers on the Production and Construal of Discourse.” Modern Foreign Languages 35(4):393–400.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Xiao, Hao-Zhang, Weiwei Zhang & Ruifeng Mo
Xiao, Hao-Zhang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
