Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 31:2 (2021) ► pp.198–224

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Metapragmatic comments on relating across cultures

Korean students’ uncertainties over relating to UK academics

ORCiD logo with link | Shanghai Jiao Tong University
ORCiD logo with link | University of Warwick
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 30 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20004.kim
Abstract
This paper analyses postings made by student applicants on Korean online communities about how best to handle interactions with potential future PhD supervisors at UK universities. The questions they posed reveal the lack of relevant contextual information they experienced, especially around the rights and obligations of supervisors. This paper thus analyses students’ metapragmatic comments and argues for greater attention to be paid within interpersonal and intercultural pragmatics to interactional goals and conceptions of role relations, especially the rights and obligations associated with them. The analysis has revealed that background information on role relations is of great importance for relational management and communication planning in high stakes intercultural interaction. This suggests that potential cultural variation in the perceived rights and obligations associated with a given role (in this case, PhD supervisor) and their implications for assessments of role relations are of central concern.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Multidisciplinary perspectives on relating across cultures
    • 2.1Discourse perspectives on relating
    • 2.2Participants and relating
    • 2.3Culture, framing and relating
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Analytic procedures
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Comments and questions on role responsibilities and power
    • 4.2Comments and questions on communication protocols
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Goals and issues of uncertainty
    • 5.2The impact of culture: Emic perspectives and ‘being Korean’
    • 5.3Implications for interpersonal and intercultural pragmatics
  • 6.Concluding comments
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (58)
References
Allwood, Jens. 2007. “Activity Based Studies of Linguistic Interaction. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics.” Available at: [URL] [accessed 26 May 2020].
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Relating.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 137–165. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bae, Young Han, Michelle Hough, Jong Woo Jun, and Ilyoung Ju. 2018. “Cultural Differences among Young Adult Consumers in Hong Kong, Japan, and Korea.” Journal of Global Marketing 31 (1): 18–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, Charles R., and James Bradac. 1982. Language and Social Knowledge: Uncertainty in Interpersonal Relations. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, Charles R., and Richard J. Calabrese. 1975. “Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a Developmental Theory of Interpersonal Communication.” Human Communication Research 1 (2): 99–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabrielle Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandle, Gaspar. 2011. “Roles.” In The Concise Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. by George Ritzer and J. Michael Ryan. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesrity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Rong, Lin He, and Chunmei Hu. 2013. “Chinese Requests: In Comparison to American and Japanese Requests and with Reference to the ‘East-West divide’.” Journal of Pragmatics 551 (Sep): 140–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 2006. “Japanese Politeness as an Interactional Achievement: Academic Consultation Sessions in Japanese Universities.” Multilingua 251: 269–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, Robert T., Karen Tracy, and Frances Spisak. 1986. “The Discourse of Requests: Assessment of a Politeness Approach.” Human Communication Research 12 (4): 437–468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crane, Paul S. 1968. Korean Patterns. Seoul: Hollym.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. “Politeness and Impoliteness.” In Handbooks of Pragmatics, Vol.5 Pragmatics of Society (General editors Wolfram Bublitz, Andreas H. Jucker and Klaus P. Schneider), ed. by Karin Aijmer and Gisle Andersen, 391–436. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewulf, Art, Barbara Gray, Linda Putnam, Roy J. Lewicki, Noelle Aarts, Rene Bouwen, and Cees van Woerkum. 2009. “Disentangling Approaches to Framing in Conflict and Negotiation Research: A Meta-Paradigmatic Perspective.” Human Relations 62 (2): 155–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBois, Jill. 2004. Cultures of the World: Korea. New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2009. “Relationship Thinking and Human Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 60–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Ronald, and Shalom H. Schwartz. 2011. “Whence Differences in Value Priorities?: Individual, Cultural, or Artifactual Sources.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42 (7): 1127–1144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce, and William Nolan. 1981. “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form.” In The Sociolinguistics of Deference & Politeness, ed. by Joel Walters, 93–111. Special issue (27) of the International Journal of the Sociology of Language. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
French, John R. P. Jr., and Bertram Raven. 1959. “The Bases of Social Power.” In Studies in Social Power, ed. by Dorwin Cartwright, 150–167. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michegan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, Susan M., and Joyce Neu (eds). 1995. Speech Acts across Cultures. Challenges to Communication in a Second Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelfand, Michele J. 2018. Rule Makers, Rule Breakers. London: Robinson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelfand, Michele J., Jana L. Raver, Lisa H. Nishii, Lisa M. Leslie, Janetta Lun, Beng Chong Lim, Duan Lili, et al. 2011. “Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study.” Science 3321: 1100–1104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2006. “Ethnopragmatics: A New Paradigm.” In Ethnopragmatics: Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context, ed. by Cliff Goddard, 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffin, Em. 2012. A First Look at Communication Theory. Eighth edition. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Philip, Robert T. Moran, and Sarah V. Moran. 2004. Managing Cultural Differences: Global Leadership Strategies for the 21st Century. 6th edition. Burlington, MA, USA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatfield, Hunter, and Jee-Won Hahn. 2011. “What Korean Apologies Require of Politeness Theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5): 1303–1317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, Bethan L. Davies, and Andrew John Merrison. 2011. “Situating Politeness.” In Situated Politeness, ed. by Bethan L. Davies, Michael Haugh and Andrew John Merrison, 1–23. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 8 (2/3): 223–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele. 1990. “Linguistic Politeness – Current Research Issues.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 193–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2014. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “The Logic of Politeness; or, Minding Your P’s and Q’s.” In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leary, Mark R. 1995. Self-Presentation. Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leary, Mark R., and Robin M. Kowalski. 1990. “Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model.” Psychological Bulletin 107 (1): 34–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Keun S., and Anil Mathur. 1997. “Formalization, Role Stress, Organizational Commitment, and Propensity-to-Leave.” Journal of Global Marketing 11 (2): 23–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lefringhausen, Katharina, Helen Spencer-Oatey, and Carolin Debray. 2019. “Culture, Norms and the Assessment of Communication Contexts: Multidisciplinary Perspectives.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 50 (10): 1098–1111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, Kwok, and Michael W. Morris. 2015. “Values, Schemas, and Norms in the Culture–Behavior Nexus: a Situated Dynamics Framework.” Journal of International Business Studies 461: 1028–1050. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2006. “Polite Behavior within Relational Work: The Discursive Approach to Politeness.” Multilingua 251: 249–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Sage L. Graham (eds). 2010. Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. “Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 403–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. “Politeness and Conversational Universals – Observations from Japanese.” Multilingua 8 (2/3): 207–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramirez, Artemio, Joseph B. Walther, Judee K. Burgoon, and Michael Sunnafrank. 2002. “Information-Seeking Strategies, Uncertainty, and Computer-Mediated Communication: Toward a Conceptual Model.” Human Communication Research 28 (2): 213–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robertson, Seth. 2019. “Korean Nunchi and Well-being.” Science, Religion and Culture 6 (1): 103–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 1996. “Reconsidering Power and Distance.” Journal of Pragmatics 26 (1): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Face, (Im)politeness and Rapport.” In Culturally Speaking. Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Conceptualising the ‘Relational’ in Pragmatics: Insights from Metapragmatic Emotion and (Im)politeness Comments.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3565–3578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Relating at Work: Facets, Dialectics and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 121–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2020. Intercultural Politeness: Managing Relations across Cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, Katharina Lefringhausen, and Carolin Debray. 2019. “Culture, Norms, and the Assessment of Communication Contexts: Discussion and Pointers for the Future.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 50 (10): 1216–1220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph H. 2002. “Role Theory.” In Handbook of Sociological Theory, ed. by Jonathan H. Turner, 233–254. New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich. 1992. “Introduction.” In Politeness in Language, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Burford, James, Sophia Kier-Byfield, Dangeni, Emily F. Henderson & Ahmad Akkad
2025. Pre-application doctoral communications: a missing dimension in research on doctoral admissions. Educational Review 77:5 ► pp. 1627 ff. DOI logo
Dangeni, James Burford & Sophia Kier-Byfield
2025. Improving the clarity of doctoral admissions webpage information: a UK institutional case study. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 29:4 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Kier-Byfield, Sophia, James Burford & Emily F. Henderson
2025. ‘5 secrets they won’t tell you’: The content and rhetoric of YouTube advice videos about searching for a doctoral supervisor. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 62:1 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Kasim, Nuraeni & Sueb
2024. Speech Acts, Politeness, and Pragmatic Failures in Intercultural Contexts. Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language 2:3 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Rickey
2024. Audience design and pragmatic conceptions of moves and upvotes during advice-giving on Reddit. Journal of Pragmatics 219 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Barkoukis, Vassilis, Luca Mallia, Lambros Lazuras, Despoina Ourda, Sara Agnello, Marija Andjelkovic, Konstantin Bochaver, Dirk Folkers, Dmitriy Bondarev, Nenad Dikic, Dennis Dreiskämper, Andrea Petróczi, Bernd Strauss & Arnaldo Zelli
2022. The role of comprehensive education in anti-doping policy legitimacy and support among clean athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 60 ► pp. 102173 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Kyung Hye & Helen Spencer-Oatey
2021. Enhancing the recruitment of postgraduate researchers from diverse countries: managing the application process. Higher Education 82:5 ► pp. 917 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue