Article published In: The Pragmatics of Ritual
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
[Pragmatics 30:1] 2020
► pp. 116–141
Urban interaction ritual
Strangership, civil inattention and everyday incivilities in public space
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 6 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19022.hor
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19022.hor
Abstract
Most encounters between strangers in urban public spaces involve the ritual of civil inattention ( 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.). Generalized diffusion of this ritual upholds the urban interaction order.
This article outlines a typology of infractions of the ritual of civil inattention, and focuses on two types: uncivil attention
and uncivil inattention. Drawing on interviews (n = 326) about participants’ most recent encounter with a rude
stranger in urban public space gathered by the Researching Incivilities in Everyday Life (RIEL) Project, variations between
verbally, physically, and gesturally initiated incivilities are examined. Data suggests a correlation between types of initiating
move and subsequent verbal exchange. Analysis demonstrates the value of ritual framing for understanding interactional conflict
between strangers, and indicates that the broader concept of incivility can supplement and extend existing impoliteness research
by encompassing both linguistic and non-linguistic forms of interactional conflict.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Cities, strangers, and im/politeness
- 2.1The distinct realm of urban interaction
- 2.2The relative absence of copresent strangers from im/politeness research
- 2.3Stranger interactions beyond im/politeness research
- 3.Ritual dimensions of expressive social activity
- 3.1Civil inattention as urban interaction ritual
- 3.2Ritual at the intersection of im/politeness research and cultural sociology
- 4.Urban interaction ritual: A typology
- 5.
Researching Incivilities in Everyday Life (RIEL) project data
- 5.1Data and methodology
- 5.2The civil/uncivil line: Interpreting interaction ritual breaches
- 6.Initiating moves in uncivil encounters
- 6.1From initiation to escalation
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (102)
Alexander, J. C. 2004a. “Rethinking Strangeness: From Structures in Space to Discourses in Civil Society.” Thesis Eleven 791: 87–104.
2004b. “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy.” Sociological Theory 221: 527–573.
Alexander, J. C., B. Giesen, and J. L. Mast (Eds.). 2006. Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. 2003. “Face and Politeness: New (Insights) for Old (Concepts).” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1453–1469.
Barros García, M. J., and M. Terkourafi. 2014. “First-Order Politeness in Rapprochement and Distancing Cultures” Pragmatics 241: 1–34.
Berger, C. R., and R. J. Calabrese. 1975. “Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a Developmental Theory of Interpersonal Communication.” Human Communication Research 11: 99–112.
Blum, A. F., and P. McHugh. 1971. “The Social Ascription of Motives.” American Sociological Review 361: 98–109.
Bou-Franch, P., and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2014. “The Pragmatics of Textual Participation in the Social Media.” Journal of Pragmatics, 731: 1–3.
Bousfield, D. 2007. “Beginnings, Middles and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 2185–2216.
2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2010. “Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by M. Locher and S. Graham, 101–134. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bousfield, D., and J. Culpeper. 2008. “Impoliteness: Eclecticism and Diaspora.” Journal of Politeness Research. 4(2): 161–168.
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 11: 35–72.
Culpeper, J., M. Haugh, and D. Z. Kádár (Eds.). 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Culpeper, J., Terkourafi, M. 2017. “Pragmatic Approaches (Im)politeness,” in: The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. by Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., Kádár, D. 11–39, London: Palgrave.
Duneier, M., and H. Molotch. 1999. “Talking City Trouble: Interactional Vandalism, Social Inequality, and the ‘Urban Interaction Problem’.” American Journal of Sociology 1041: 1263–1295. [URL]
Dynel, M., and F. Poppi. 2019. “Risum teneatis, amici?: The Socio-Pragmatics of RoastMe Humour.” Journal of Pragmatics 1391: 1–21.
Edmondson, W. and J. House. 1981. Let’s Talk, and Talk about It: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. München: Urban u. Schwarzenberg.
Evans, M., Jeffries, L., & O’Driscoll, J. (Eds.). 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict. New York: Routledge.
Flint, N., M. Haugh, and Merrison, A. 2019. “Modulating Troubles Affiliating in Initial Interactions: The Role of Remedial Accounts.” Pragmatics 29(3): 384–409.
Gardner, C. B. 1980. “Passing by: Street Remarks, Address Rights, and the Urban Female.” Sociological Inquiry 501: 328–356.
Gardner, C. 1988. “Access Information: Public Lies and Private Peril.” Social Problems 351: 384–397.
1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
Goffman, E., and J. Verhoeven. 1980. “An Interview with Erving Goffman.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 261: 317–348.
Graham, S. L. 2019. “Interaction and Conflict in Digital Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by M. Evans, L. Jeffries, and J. O’Driscoll, pp. 310–327. New York: Routledge.
Hamilton, M. A. 2012. “Verbal Aggression: Understanding the Psychological Antecedents and Social Consequences.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 311: 5–12.
Harris, J. W. 1995. “Etiquette, Lynching, and Racial Boundaries in Southern History: A Mississippi Example.” The American Historical Review 1001: 387.
2017a. “Interaction, Indifference, Injustice: Elements of a Normative Theory of Urban Solidarity.” In Interrogating the Social: A Critical Sociology for the 21st Century, ed. by F. Kurasawa, 61–94. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.
2017b. “Mundane Mutualities: Solidarity and Strangership in Everyday Urban Life.” In Place, Diversity and Solidarity, ed. by Oosterlynck, S., Schuermans, N., and Loopmans, M., 19–32, New York: Routledge.
Horgan, Mervyn. 2019a. “Everyday Incivility and the Urban Interaction Order: Theorizing Moral Affordances in Ritualized Interaction.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(1), 32–55.
Horgan, M. 2019b. “Review of ‘Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction’”. Contemporary Sociology 481, 318–320.
House, Juliane. 2013. “Developing Pragmatic Competence in English as a Lingua Franca: Using Discourse Markers to Express (Inter)Subjectivity and Connectivity.” Journal of Pragmatics 591: 57–67.
Ickes, W., A. Park, and R. L. Robinson. 2012. “F#!%ing Rudeness: Predicting the Propensity to Verbally Abuse Strangers.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 311: 75–94.
Jackson, L., C. Harris, and G. Valentine. 2017. “Rethinking Concepts of the Strange and the Stranger.” Social & Cultural Geography 181: 1–15.
Jay, T. 2018. “Swearing, Moral Order, and Online Communication.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 61: 107–126.
Kádár, D. 2012. “Relational Ritual.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren, 1–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendrick, K., and P. Drew. 2016. “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 491: 1–19.
Khan, K. 2019. “Hate Crimes: Language, Vulnerability and Conflict.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by M. Evans, L. Jeffries, and J. O’Driscoll, 417–432. New York: Routledge.
Kienpointner, M. 1997. “Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances.” Functions of Language 41: 251–287.
Korobov, N. 2011. “Mate-Preference Talk in Speed-Dating Conversations.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 441: 186–209.
Lankenau, S. 1999. “Panhandling Repertoires and Routines for Overcoming the Nonperson Treatment.” Deviant Behavior 201: 183–206.
Leiter, M. 2013. Analyzing and Theorizing the Dynamics of the Workplace Incivility Crisis. New York: Springer.
Liinamaa, S. 2014. “Contemporary Art’s ‘Urban Question’ and Practices of Experimentation.” Third Text 281: 529–544.
Locher, M. 2010. “Introduction: Politeness and Impoliteness in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 1–5.
Locher, M., Watts, R. 2005. Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research 11, 9–33.
Lofland, L. 1973. A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space. New York: Basic Books.
1998. The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Mills, C. W. 1940. “Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive.” American Sociological Review 51: 904–913.
Mondada, L. 2009. “Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1977–1997.
2018. “Greetings as a Device to Find Out and Establish the Language of Service Encounters in Multilingual Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 1261: 10–28.
Morrill, C., D. A. Snow, and C. H. White (Eds.). 2005. Together Alone: Personal Relationships in Public Places. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure. 2013. Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Toronto: Ministry of Infrastructure. [URL]
Parvaresh, V., and T. Tayebi. 2018. “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 1321: 91–107.
Raudenbush, D. T. 2012. “Race and Interactions on Public Transportation: Social Cohesion and the Production of Common Norms and a Collective Black Identity.” Symbolic Interaction 351: 456–473.
Scott, M. B., and S. M. Lyman. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 331: 46–62. [URL]
Sifianou, M. 2019. “Im/politeness and In/Civility: A Neglected Relationship?” Journal of Pragmatics, 1471: 49–64.
Sifianou, M., & Tzanne, A. 2010. “Conceptualizations of Politeness and Impoliteness in Greek.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(4): 661–687.
Smith, G. 1997. “Incivil Attention and Everyday Intolerance: Vicissitudes of Exercising in Public Places.” Perspectives on Social Problems 91: 59–79.
Smith, P., T. L. Phillips, and R. D. King. 2010. Incivility: The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, R. J. 2017. “The Practical Organisation of Space, Interaction, and Communication in and as the Work of Crossing a Shared Space Intersection.” Sociologica 21: 1–19.
Stokoe, E. 2010. “‘Have You Been Married, or …?’: Eliciting and Accounting for Relationship Histories in Speed-Dating Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 431: 260–282.
Svennevig, J. 2014. “Direct and Indirect Self-Presentation in First Conversations.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 331: 302–327.
Sznaider, N. 2001. The Compassionate Temperament: Care and Cruelty in Modern Society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Terkourafi, M. 2012. “Politeness and Pragmatics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by K. Allan, and K. Jaszczolt, 617–637. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Terkourafi, M., and D. Kádár. 2017. “Convention and Ritual (Im)politeness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, and D. Kádár, 171–195. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Valentine, G. 2008. “Living with Difference: Reflections on Geographies of Encounter.” Progress in Human Geography 321: 323–337.
Vergis, N., and M. Terkourafi. 2015. “The Role of the Speaker’s Emotional State in Im/politeness Assessments.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 341: 316–342.
Wesselmann, E., F. Cardoso, S. Slater, and K. Williams. 2012. “To Be Looked at as Though Air: Civil Attention Matters.” Psychological Science 231: 166–168.
Wirth, L. 1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.” American Journal of Sociology 441: 1–24. [URL]
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Koskinen, Emmi, Melisa Stevanovic, Liisa Voutilainen, Mariel Wuolio & Anssi Peräkylä
Olakivi, Antero, Melisa Stevanovic, Henri Nevalainen, Pentti Henttonen & Niklas Ravaja
Patterson, Kip Errett
Watts, Galen & Mervyn Horgan
Cang, He, Juliane House, Fengguang Liu & Dániel Z. Kádár
Protasiuk, Ewa, Alicia Chatterjee & Melissa E Dichter
van Dorst, Isolde, Mathew Gillings & Jonathan Culpeper
Abbott, Owen, Vanessa May, Sophie Woodward, Robert Meckin & Leah Gilman
Abbott, Owen, Vanessa May, Sophie Woodward, Robert Meckin & Leah Gilman
Arminen, Ilkka A. T. & Anna S. M. Heino
Gao, Xiang & Qingrong Liu
Li, Jie & Yanling Lin
2023. Parentheses used as pragmatic strategies in Chinese online socialization. Pragmatics and Society 14:3 ► pp. 442 ff.
Shoham, Hizky
Smith, Robin James, Jonathan Ablitt, Joe Williams & Tom Hall
Sträuli, Louise
Haugh, Michael
Haugh, Michael
2024. Online public denunciation as recursive social practice. Internet Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 161 ff.
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár & Rosina Márquez Reiter
Vassenden, Anders & Ingrid Rusnes
Horgan, Mervyn
Horgan, Mervyn
Jaworski, Adam & Jackie Jia Lou
Leyland, Christopher & James Riley
Horgan, Mervyn, Saara Liinamaa, Amanda Dakin, Sofia Meligrana & Meng Xu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
