Cover not available

Article published In: The Pragmatics of Ritual
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
[Pragmatics 30:1] 2020
► pp. 142–168

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Ritual frames

A contrastive pragmatic approach

 | Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 | University of Hamburg | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 3 December 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19018.kad
Abstract
Our study provides a corpus-based contrastive pragmatic investigation of the expressions please in English and qing 请 in Chinese. We define such expressions as ‘ritual frame indicating expressions’ (henceforth RFIEs) and argue that RFIEs are deployed in settings where it is important to show awareness of the rights and obligations. ‘Ritual frame’ encompasses a cluster of standard situations. On the one hand the corpus-based investigation of ritual provides an innovative complement to sociopragmatic approaches to ritual behaviour because they reveal how RFIEs that indicate ritual spread across a cluster of standard situations. On the other hand, it allows the researcher to contrast the scope of ritual across lingua-cultures by comparatively looking into the standard situations in which a particular RFIE is deployed. Findings of our data analysis point to intriguing differences between English and Chinese RFIEs, as well as relevant lingua-cultural reasons behind such differences.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Introducing ritual frame indicating expressions
    • 1.2Positioning the concept of RFIE in the field
  • 2.Analytical framework
  • 3.Method of data collection
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1The English dataset
      • 4.1.1Service encounters
      • 4.1.2Institutional with power-salience
      • 4.1.3Institutional without power-salience
      • 4.1.4Public display
    • 4.2The Chinese dataset
      • 4.2.1Ceremonial
      • 4.2.2Institutional with power-salience
      • 4.2.3Institutional without power-salience
      • 4.2.4Public displays
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle. 2014. “Pragmatic Borrowing.” Journal of Pragmatics 671: 17–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence. 1992. “Frames, Concepts and Conceptual Fields.” In Frames, Fields and Contrasts, ed. by Adrienne Lehrer, and Eva Feder Kittay, 21–74. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel. 2010. “Rituals.” In Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 483–521. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2005. “Frames Revisited: The Coherence-Inducing Function of Frames.” Journal of Pragmatics 371: 685–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1981. “Conversational Routine.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 1–18. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (12): 3232–3245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dai, Jin-huei. 2007. “Love You” Doesn’t Mean “I Love You”: Just a Way to Say Goodbye. The Nature of Leave-taking and its Pragmatic Applications in Mandarin Chinese. In 2007 Selected Papers from Pragmatics in the CJK Classroom: The State of the Art, ed. by Dina R. Yoshimi and Haidan Wang. Retrieved from: [URL]
Edmondson, Willis. 1985. “Discourse Worlds in the Classroom and in Foreign Language Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7 (2): 159–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleason, Jean Berko, Rivka Y. Perlmann, and Esther Blank Greif. 1984. “What’s the Magic Word: Learning Language through Politeness Routines.” Discourse Processes 7 (4): 493–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 1995. “Pragmatics and Power.” Journal of Pragmatics 23 (2): 117–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 1989. “Politeness in English and German: The Functions of Please and Bitte.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriel Kasper, 96–119. Norwood, N.J.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Juliane, and Gabriele Kasper. 1981. “Politeness Markers in English and German.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 157–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 8 (2/3): 223–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, David. 2009. Spectacle and Sacrifice: The Ritual Foundations of Village Life in North China. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Juliane House. 2020. Evaluating the Appropriacy of Using Ritual Frame Indicating Expressions (RFIEs) – A case study of learners of Chinese and English. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Contrastive Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z., Puyu Ning, and Yongping Ran. 2018. “Public Ritual Apology – A Case Study of Chinese.” Discourse, Context and Media 261: 21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar. 2009. “Public (non-) Apologies: The Discourse of Minimizing Responsibility.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11): 2257–2270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2016. “Situation-bound Utterances in Chinese. East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1): 107–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1972. “Language in Context.” Language 48 (4): 907–927. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee-Wong, Song Mei. 1994. “Qing/Please – A Polite or Requestive Marker? Observations from Chinese.” Multilingua 13 (4): 343–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17 (5/6): 365–399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, Naitian. 2003. “试说兼语结构与“请”” [A tentative study on concurrent structure and the usage of the word ‘Please’]. Journal of Henan Institute of Technology 22 (4): 78–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1935. Coral Gardens and Their Magic: A Study of the Methods of Tilling the Soil and Agricultural Rites in the Trobriand Islands. Hamburg: Servus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1954. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. English translation by W. D. Halls. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara. 2003. “Re-examining Politeness, Face and the Japanese Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10/11): 1471–1506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2014. “Activity Types, Discourse Types and Interactional Hybridity: The Case of Genetic Counselling.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Malcolm Coulthard, 1–27. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schank, Roger, and Robert Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharoff, Serge, Reinhard Rapp, Pierre Zweigenbaim, and Pascale Fung. 2013. Building and Using Comparable Corpora. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. (ed.). 2000. Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1979. “What’s in a Frame? Service Evidence for Underlaying Expectations. In New Directions in Discourse Processing, ed. by Roy Friedl, 14–56. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Maria. 2005. “Beyond the Micro-Level of Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 237–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “The Puzzle of Indirect Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2861–2865. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1979. “Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6 (4): 465–499. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Mulken, Margot. 1996. “Politeness Markers in French and Dutch Requests.” Language Sciences 18 (3/4): 689–702. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne. 2004. “The Intonation of Please-Requests: A Corpus-Based Study.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (9): 1521–1549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodfield, Helen, and Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis. 2010. “‘I just need more time’: A Study of Native and Non-Native Students’ Requests to Faculty for an Extension.” Multilingua 29 (1): 77–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (46)

Cited by 46 other publications

Diegoli, Eugenia
2025. “This apology doesn't seem sincere at all” (Meta)discourses around Will Smith's apology in English and Japanese YouTube comments. Journal of Pragmatics 237 ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Held, Gudrun
2025. ‘Gefälliges’ Bitten – oder: Sprachliche Höflichkeitskonventionen unter der kontrastiven Lupe. In Text, Diskurs, Pragmatik kontrastiv [InnTraRom. Beiträge zu Sprache, Kultur und Translation, 3], ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Xu & Xuekun Liu
2025. Understanding complaints: the role of moral transgressions in e-commerce interactions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12:1 DOI logo
Huang, Xu & Yongping Ran
2025. Genuine or ostensible politeness?. Journal of Historical Pragmatics DOI logo
Nhung, Dr. Pham Thi Hong & Thai Thi Thanh Tuyen
2025. Vietnamese Perceptions of (Im)politeness through Their Narratives of Medical Encounters with Native English-Speaking Doctors during Postgraduate Study abroad. Journal of Intercultural Communication DOI logo
Pan, Zhaoyi
2025. Ritual frame indicating expressions used in requests in intercultural communication. Journal of Politeness Research 21:2 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Zhan, Linlin, Shanshan Yu, Xiaoming Shang & You Li
2025. Force dynamics of (im)politeness: evidence from (im)politeness of Chinese parent–child discourse in family mealtimes. Journal of Politeness Research DOI logo
Zhao, Zhiwei, Chengtuan Li, Jing Han & Huhua Ouyang
2025. “Kaigewanxiao” (‘Just kidding’): the use of humor markers in Chinese media discourse. Text & Talk DOI logo
Jia, Yunhan
2024. The English politeness marker please in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 230 ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Keiko Todo & Tingting Xiao
2024. Revisiting the binary view of honorifics in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 20:2 ► pp. 533 ff. DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio & Carmen Lepadat
2024. Verbal engagement in doctor–patient interaction: Resonance in Western and Traditional Chinese Medicine. Journal of Pragmatics 230 ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Rong
2023. The Rituals of Pragmatics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Shiyu Liu
2023. Greeting in English as a Foreign Language: A Problem for Speakers of Chinese. Applied Linguistics 44:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Wenrui Shi
2023. Historical language use in Europe from a contrastive pragmatic perspective. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Li, Hui & Jie Ji
2023. Native observers’ evaluations of ritual frame indicating expressions in Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2 ► pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Liao, Guohai & Dengshan Xia
2023. Historical poem-quoting interaction: An interaction-speech act-ritual integrative study of fù in ancient China. Journal of Pragmatics 214 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Fengguang, Wenrui Shi, Dániel Z. Kádár & Juliane House
2023. Criticising as a disciplinary action: A problem for learners of Chinese as a foreign language?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 508 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Jia, Xinren Chen & Yanli Cao
2023. A contrastive analysis of congratulate by native speakers of Chinese and advanced learners of Chinese. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 476 ff. DOI logo
Rygg, Kristin & Stine Hulleberg Johansen
2023. When the Norwegian ‘politeness marker’ vennligst becomes impolite. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2 ► pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Na & Jiabei Hu
2023. Getting involved or acting in defence. Pragmatics and Society 14:3 ► pp. 410 ff. DOI logo
Li, Hui
2022.  Keqi (客气) in historical Chinese: evidence from metapragmatic comments. Journal of Politeness Research 18:2 ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Shelby R., Hilal Ergül & Salvatore Attardo
2022. “Dr. Shelby, that’s a world record!”. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:1 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Qian, Leyi
2022. Beyond negation: “Not” as evaluation and speech-act trigger in Mandarin Chinese negative markers. Journal of Pragmatics 187 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Ren, Wei
2022. Effects of proficiency and gender on learners’ use of the pragmatic marker 吧ba. Lingua 277 ► pp. 103405 ff. DOI logo
Ren, Wei & Saeko Fukushima
2022. Perception and evaluation of requests on social media in Chinese and Japanese. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Zhuo Bi
2021. Altered speech act indication: A problem for foreign language learners?. System 101 ► pp. 102554 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu, Shiyu Liu, Wenrui Shi, Zongfeng Xia & Lin Jiao
2021. Interaction, speech acts and ritual: An integrative model. Lingua 257 ► pp. 103082 ff. DOI logo
Jia, Mian & Guoping Yang
2021. Emancipating Chinese (im)politeness research: Looking back and looking forward. Lingua 251 ► pp. 103028 ff. DOI logo
Kampf, Zohar
2021. Political speech acts in contrast: The case of calls to condemn in news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 180 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Ritual frames and mimesis: Analysing military training in Chinese universities. Language & Communication 80 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. ‘Politeness Markers’ Revisited - A Contrastive Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Conventionalization and Conventions. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Fengguang Liu & Yulong Song
2021. Admonishing. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Ling Zhou
2021.  Self-Denigration in 21st Century Chinese . Journal of Politeness Research 17:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Fengguang, Dan Han, Dániel Z. Kádár & Juliane House
2021. The expressions ‘(M)minzu-zhuyi’ and ‘Nationalism’: A contrastive pragmatic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 174 ► pp. 168 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Evaluating the appropriacy of Ritual Frame Indicating Expressions (RFIEs): A case study of learners of Chinese and English. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. T/V pronouns in global communication practices: The case of IKEA catalogues across linguacultures. Journal of Pragmatics 161 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Altered speech act indication: A contrastive pragmatic study of English and Chinese Thank and Greet expressions. Lingua 264 ► pp. 103162 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. German and Japanese war crime apologies: A contrastive pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics 177 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2022. Political Language in Contrast: An Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 188 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2020. Review of Freytag (2020): Exploring Politeness in Business Emails: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Pragmatics and Society 11:4 ► pp. 669 ff. DOI logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Ying Tong & Francisco Yus
2020. Bonding across Chinese social media. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:3 ► pp. 431 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue