Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 19:4 (2009) ► pp.501–518
Evaluation of politeness
Do the Japanese evaluate attentiveness more positively than the British?
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.4.01fuk
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.4.01fuk
This study investigates evaluation of attentiveness by British and Japanese university students. Attentiveness (kikubari) (defined as a demonstrator’s preemptive response to a beneficiary’s verbal/non-verbal cues or situations) is demonstrated without being requested and it is one of the important politeness strategies. A questionnaire including six attentiveness situations was distributed to 74 British and 138 Japanese participants, who were asked to evaluate the attentiveness situations on a five-point Likert scale and to state the reasons for their evaluation. The Likert-scale evaluations were analyzed using a three-way ANOVA and subsequently, the reasons for evaluations were analyzed qualitatively. It was anticipated that the Japanese would evaluate attentiveness more positively than the British, as attentiveness has been important in Japanese culture. The results, however, did not necessarily confirm this. That is, there were significant differences between British and Japanese participants in four situations, the British participants having evaluated attentiveness more positively than the Japanese participants in two situations and the reverse being the case in two other situations.
Keywords: Evaluation, Politeness, British, Japanese, Attentiveness
References (23)
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cocroft, Beth-Ann K., and Stella Ting-Toomey (1994) Facework in Japan and the United States. International journal of intercultural relations 18.4: 469-506.
Fukushima, Saeko (2000) Requests and culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Bern: Peter Lang.
(forthcoming) Hearer’s aspect in politeness: The case of requests. In D. Shu & K. Turner (eds.), Contrasting meaning. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hatch, Evelyn, and Anne Lazaraton (1991) The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
(2005) A review of requests and culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese by Saeko Fukushima. Journal of politeness research 1.1: 160-165.
(2007) The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal of pragmatics 391: 84-110.
Hikey, Leo, and Miranda Stewart (2005) Introduction. In L. Hickey & M. Stewart (eds.), Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 1-12.
Hofstede, Geert (1991) Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Ohashi, Jun (2003) Japanese culture specific face and politeness orientation: A pragmatic investigation of yoroshiku onegaishimasu. Multilingua 22.3: 257-274.
(2008) Linguistic rituals for thanking in Japanese: Balancing obligations. Journal of pragmatics 401: 2150-2174.
Sifianou, Maria (1992) Politeness phenomena in England and Greece: A cross-cultural perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
(1997) Silence and politeness. In A. Jaworski (ed.), Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63-84.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen (2000) Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.
Stewart, Miranda (2005) Politeness in Britain: “It’s only a suggestion…” In L. Hickey & M. Stewart (eds.), Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 116-129.
Ting-Toomey, Stella (2009) Facework collision in intercultural communication. In F. Bargiela-Chiappin & M. Haugh (eds.), Face, communication and social interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 227-249.
Yoshida, Tomoko (1994) Interpersonal versus non-interpersonal realities: An effective tool individualists can use to better understand collectivists. In R.W. Brislin & T. Yoshida (eds.), Improving intercultural interactions: Modules for cross-cultural training programs . Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 243-267.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Sorlin, Sandrine
Zhao, Linsen
Haugh, Michael
Ran, Yongping & Linsen Zhao
Fukushima, Saeko & Maria Sifianou
Fukushima, Saeko
Fukushima, Saeko
Fukushima, Saeko
2022. Evaluation of (im)politeness. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 275 ff.
Fukushima, Saeko
2022. A cross-generational and cross-cultural study on demonstration of attentiveness. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 549 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
