Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 19:2 (2009) ► pp.223–239
Discourse as communicative action
Validation of China’s new socio-cultural paradigm Qiye wenhua ‘enterprise culture’
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.04lee
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.04lee
Qiye wenhua/’enterprise culture’ has emerged as a new paradigm in China’s economic reforms. Hailed as China’s new ‘culture’ it featured in an interview with certain executives of non-state owned enterprises. In the examination of this discourse, the concept of ‘communicative action’ (Habermas, 1998) is adopted as an analytical tool. The main contention in this exploratory examination is that there is speaker intent to justify China’s model of socialist market economy. This justification is mainly reflected in the semantic content of the discourse, which stresses what is ‘unique’ and ‘characteristic’ in China’s economic reforms. The rationale for this contention rests primarily on the argument that given the context of skepticism and criticisms leveled at the Chinese model, and the fact that the speakers themselves are key players in the new market economy, it would be likely that in a public discourse of this nature there would be grounds for attempts at legitimizing the Chinese economic model.
References (29)
Braaten, Jane (1991) Habermas’s Critical Theory of Society. New York: The State University of New York Press.
Chen, Sheyin (2002) Economic reform and social change in China: Past, present, and future of the economic state. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society. 15.4: 569-586.
Cook, Maeve (ed.) (1998) Habermas Jurgen: On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Dirlik, Arif (1988) Post socialism? Reflections on ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics. In Peter P. Cheng (ed.), Marxism and Capitalism in the People’s Republic of China. New York: University Press of America, pp. 1-15.
Fowler, Roger (1996) On critical linguistics'. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.
Fukuyama, Francis (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Habermas, Jurgen (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1 Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hodge, Bob, G. Kress, & G. Jones (1979) The ideology of middle management. In Roger Fowler, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew (eds.), Language and Control. London: Routledge, pp. 81-93. BoP
Hodge, Robert, & Gunther Kress (1993) 2nd edition Language as Ideology. London: Routledge. BoP
Hu Jintao (2008) [URL] (Xinhua)
Kluver, Alan R. (1996) Legitimating the Chinese economic reforms. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kress, Gunther (1985) Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Victoria: Deakin University Press. BoP
Marx, K.H. (1951) The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx-Engels, Selected Works. Lawrence and Wishart.
Su Shaozi, Brus, Wlodrizimierz, Eaton, John et al. (1982) Democracy and socialism in China'. Berne Convention. Nottingham: Russel Press.
Sullivan, Michael (1985) C.C.P. Ideology since the Third Plenum. In B. Brugger (ed.), Chinese Marxism in Flux 1978-84. Sydney: Croom Helm Ltd.
Sun, Yan (1995) The Chinese Reassessment of Socialism, 1976-1992. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press
Wang, C.L. (1994) Reform, social change and national culture. In Y.Z. Zhao & Z.L. Yuan (eds.), An Appraisal of Jingnui. (Undated)
. (1999) Mao Zedong’s thoughts, Deng Xiaoping's theory and the market economy. In Y.Z. Zhao & Z.L. Yuan (eds.), An Appraisal of Jingnui. (Undated)
Wang Kexin (undated)
Qiye Wenhua. Hebei, China.
Weil, Robert (1996) Red Cat, White Cat: China and the Contradictions of “Market Socialism”. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Weiss, G., and R. Wodak (2003) Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-32.
Williams, Raymond (1981) The analysis of culture. In T. Bennet, G. Martin, C. Mercer & J. William Woollacott (eds.), Culture, Ideology and Social Process. London: Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd., pp. 53-79.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Dan Han
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
