Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 19:2 (2009) ► pp.179–196

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Address strategies in a British academic setting

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2009
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19.2.02for
The English system of address constitutes an exception among the European languages, in that it does not have a grammatical distinction between a formal pronoun of address and an informal one. Rather, English speakers exploit lexical strategies (i.e. nominal vocatives). This study aims to shed light on the address strategies used by students and members of the teaching staff in academic interactions, with reference to the University of Reading (UK). Data from semi-structured interviews and video-recordings outline an unmarked pattern of asymmetry between the parties, in which students mainly employ formal vocatives towards lecturers (title+surname, honorifics), while lecturers frequently use first names and other informal expressions. Reciprocal informal vocatives, by contrast, emerges as a marked practice, which is resisted or delayed in time. This asymmetrical distribution of forms questions classical models and previous research on address and calls for the necessity of new components for the understanding of the phenomenon.
References (35)
Bargiela, Francesca, Corinne Boz, Lily Gokzadze, Abdurrahman Hamza, Sara Mills, and Nino Rukhadze (2002) Ethnocentrism, politeness and naming strategies. Working papers on the web 3 . [URL]. (Accessed 16th February 2008).
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan (1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike (1988) Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman (1960) The pronoun of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 253-276. Reprinted in Pier Paolo Giglioli (ed.) (1972) Language and social context. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin, pp. 252-82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Marguerite Ford (1961) Address in American English. Journal of abnormal and social psychology 621: 375-385. Reprinted in Dell Hymes (ed.) (1964) Language in culture and society. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 234-244.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren (2009) Language and human relations. Styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren (2004) Address in some western European languages. In Christo Moskovsky (ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. [URL] (Accessed on 16th February 2008).
Clyne, Michael, Heinz-Leo Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Doris Schüpbach (2006) Perceptions of variation and change in German and Swedish address. Journal of sociolinguistics 10.3: 287-319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor (1997) Forms of address and terms of reference. Journal of linguistics 33.2: 255-274.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunkling, Leslie (1990) A dictionary of epithets and terms of address. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1997) Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1986) On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrences. In John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. (Reissued with corrections and additions). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell, pp. 213-250.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol (2007) The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus based study. In Andrea Sansò (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 180-199.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilman, Albert, and Roger Brown (1958) Who says ‘Tu’ to whom? ETC: A review of general semantics 15.3: 169-174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John Harry (2000) Social class and the differentiation of employment contracts. In John Harry Goldthorpe (ed.), On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 206-229.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J., and Dell Hymes (eds.) (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes (2003) Politeness distinctions in second person pronouns. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person. (Pragmatics and beyond). Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 185-203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns. In Martin Haspelmath, Bernard Comrie, Matthew S. Dryer and David Gil (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 186-190.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006) On the development of Standard Average European (SAE) – The case of polite pronouns. Paper presented at the 28th annual meeting of the DGfS, University of Bielefeld, Germany. 22-24 February 2006.
Hickey, Leo, and Miranda Stewart (eds.) (2004) Politeness in Europe. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (2002) Rectifying a standard deficiency. Second-person pronominal distinctions in varieties of English. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 343-374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Dariusz Galasiński (2000) Vocative address forms and ideological legitimization in political debates. Discourse studies 2.1: 35-53.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey (1999) The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Hilde Hasselgård and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 107-118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally (2003) “What’s in a Name?” Social labelling and gender practices”. In Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 69-97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré (1990) Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas E. (2002) A new look at address in American English: The rules have changed. Names 50.1: 43-61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philipsen, Gerry, and Michael Huspek (1985) A bibliography of sociolinguistic studies of personal address. Anthropological linguistics 271: 94-101.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pieper, Ursula (1990) Homologie, Homöologie und Heterologie im Anredeverhalten: Anrede im Deutschen, Dänischen und Polnischen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 18.1: 1-12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel (2003) The ethnography of communication: An introduction. 3ed. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sutton, Laurel A. (1995) Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz (eds.), Gender articulated. Language and the socially constructed self. London: Routledge, pp. 279-96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wales, Katie (1996) Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, Jane, Michael Clyne, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, and Catrin Norrby (2007) The underlying pragmatics of address usage: Comparing and contrasting English with French, German and Swedish. Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Göteborg, Sweden. 8-13 July 2007.
Wierzbicka, Anna (1991) Cross-cultural pragmatics. The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. (1974) Hey, Whatsyourname!. In Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox, Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 787-801.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Uyar, Ahmet Can & İsmail Yaman
2024. How Do WE Address the Instructors in the Expanding Circle? Perspectives from Turkish EFL Speakers. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 35:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Zilberman Friedmann, Yael & Hadar Netz
2023. ‘You son of a perverse rebellious woman’: Mobilizing the storytelling event for self-empowerment. Language in Society 52:3 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
张, 艳
2023. A Study of Wang Xifeng’s Speech in A Dream of Red Mansions from the Perspective of the Adaptation Theory. Modern Linguistics 11:07 ► pp. 3193 ff. DOI logo
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria
2022. “Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek
2022. Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh
2022. Pragmatic development in the instructed context. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Bodis, Agnes
2021. ‘Double deficit’ and exclusion: Mediated language ideologies and international students’ multilingualism. Multilingua 40:3 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Mensah, Eyo O.
2021. A sociolinguistic study of address terms in a Nigerian university’s staff club. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Miner, Annette & Brenda Nicodemus
2021. Situated Community Engagement. In Situated Learning in Interpreter Education, ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Hildenbrand, Grace, Evan Perrault & Taylor Devine
2020. You May Call Me Professor: Professor Form of Address in Email Communication and College Student Reactions to Not Knowing What to Call Their Professors. Journal of Communication Pedagogy 3 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Lenchuk, Iryna & Amer Ahmed
2019. Are the Speech Acts of EFL Learners Really Direct? The Case of Requests in the Omani EFL Context. Sage Open 9:1 DOI logo
Norrby, Catrin, Doris Schüpbach, John Hajek & Heinz L. Kretzenbacher
2019. Introductions at international academic conferences. In It’s not all about you [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Mehrabi Boshrabadi, Abbas & Sepideh Bataghva Sarabi
2016. Cyber-communic at tion etiquette. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13:2 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Rau, Der-Hwa Victoria & Gerald Rau
2016. Negotiating Personal Relationship Through Email Terms of Address. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Burt, Susan Meredith
2015. “There’s not a lot of negotiation”. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 14], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Zago, Raffaele
2015. “That’s none of your business, Sy”. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Formentelli, Maicol
2014. Vocatives galore in audiovisual dialogue. English Text Construction 7:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Urban, Anna
2012. Die kleine House-Apotheke: Reception of the American, German and Polish Gregory House and Varied Translations of the Pronoun you. Research in Language 10:3 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Nominal and Pronominal Address in Jamaica and Trinidad [Topics in Address Research, 3], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue