Article published In: Networked Practices of Emotion and Stancetaking in Reactions to Mediatized Events and Crises
Edited by Korina Giaxoglou and Marjut Johansson
[Pragmatics 30:2] 2020
► pp. 201–221
Any #JesuisIraq planned?
Claiming affective displays for forgotten places
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 6 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18059.dec
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18059.dec
Abstract
The stem #jesuis followed by a toponym (e.g. #jesuisParis) has proved to be very
productive in the gathering of affective publics (Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective Publics. Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. USA: Oxford University Press.) around causes of
mourning, after terrorist attacks and other disasters. However, not all attacks have given rise to such massive affective use of
#jesuis hashtags. Our goal is to examine how Twitter users claim similar displays of affect for these “other”
places. We analyze 297 tweets in which the Twitter user utters a condolence speech act while simultaneously contesting the
unbalanced affective reactions expressed concerning some places, e.g. “Any #JesuisIraq planned?”. We observe the geographical
granularity of the referred place, the structural complexity of the tweet and, if present, the underlying motives for unbalanced
reactions suggested by the Twitter users. By doing so, we show how Twitter is used to claim attention for places that are deemed
underrepresented, thus confirming the importance of Twitter for expressing solidarity.
Keywords: hashtag, toponym, demonym, affective public, solidarity, Twitter
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Research questions
- 3.Data
- 4.Method
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Geographical granularity
- 5.2Structural complexity of the tweets
- 5.3Defining underlying motives
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (34)
An, Jisun, Haewoon Kwak, Yelena Mejova, Sonia Alonso Saenz De Oger, and Braulio Gomez Fortes. 2016. “Are You Charlie or Ahmed? Cultural Pluralism in Charlie Hebdo Response on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM). Cologne. [URL]
AoIR: Association of Internet Researchers. 2012. Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research 2.0: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. [URL] (accessed: 07/09/2018).
Badouard, Romain. 2015. ““Je ne suis pas Charlie”. Pluralité des prises de parole sur le web et les réseaux sociaux.” In Le défi Charlie. Les médias à l’épreuve des attentats, ed. by Pierre Lefébure, and Claire Sécail, 187–220. Paris: Lemieux.
Bazin, Maëlle. 2015. “L’énonciation d’un deuil national. Usages de “Je suis Charlie” dans les écritures urbaines.” In Le défi Charlie. Les médias à l’épreuve des attentats, ed. by Pierre Lefébure, and Claire Sécail, 153–186. Paris: Lemieux.
Beech, Richard. 2015. “The First Person to Tweet #JeSuisCharlie – How It Became a Symbol of Defiance and Solidarity.” Mirror Online (9 Jan. 2015). Available at: <[URL]> (accessed: 04/07/2017).
boyd, danah. 2010. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 39–58. New York: Routledge.
Bruns, Axel, and Jean Burgess. 2015. “Twitter Hashtags from Ad Hoc to Calculated Publics.” In Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks, ed. by Nathan Rambukkana, 13–28. New York: Peter Lang.
De Cock, Barbara, and Andrea Pizarro Pedraza. 2018. “From Expressing Solidarity to Mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic Functions of Hashtags Starting with #jesuis across Languages” Language in Society 471: 197–217.
de Lucena Ito, Liliane. 2015. “CharlieHebdo. A repercussão ampliada em memes e hashtags.” In Anais do XIV congresso Ibero-Americano de comunicação IBERCOM 2015: Comunicação, cultura e mídias sociais, ed. by Ricardo Romancini, and Maria Immacolata Vassallo de Lopes, 3321–3331. São Paulo: ECA-USP.
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring. 2010. “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 201: 249–268.
Georgakopoulo, Alexandra. 2015. “Introduction: Communicating Time and Place on Digital Media – Multi-layered Temporalities & (Re)localizations”. Discourse, Context and Media 91: 1–4.
Giaxoglou, Korina. 2015. “Entextualising Mourning on Facebook: Stories of Grief as Acts of Sharing.” New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 211: 1–2, 87–105.
Giaxoglou, Korina, Katrin Döveling, and Stacey Pitsillides. 2017. “Networked Emotions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Sharing Loss Online.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 61(1): 1–10.
Giaxoglou, Korina. 2018. “#JeSuisCharlie? Hashtags as Narrative Resources in Contexts of Ecstatic Sharing.” Discourse, Context & Media 221: 13–20.
Giglietto, Fabio, and Yenn Lee. 2017. “A Hashtag Worth a Thousand Words: Discursive Strategies around #JeNeSuisPasCharlie after the 2015 Charlie Hebdo Shooting.” Social Media + Society January-March: 1–15.
Heyd, Theresa, and Mirka Honkanen, Mirka. 2015. “From Naija to Chitown. The New African Diaspora and Digital Representations of Place.” Discourse, Context and Media 91: 14–23.
Heyd, Theresa, and Cornelius Puschmann. 2017. “Hashtagging and Functional Shift: Adaptation and Appropriation of the #.” Journal of Pragmatics 1161: 51–63.
Hillis, Ken, Paasonen, Susanna, and Michael Petit (eds.). 2015. Networked Affect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchby, Ian. 2001. Conversation and Technology. From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Wiley.
. 2014. “Communicative Affordances and Participation Frameworks in Mediated Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 721: 86–89.
Johansson, Marjut, Sonja Kleinke, and Lotta Lehti. 2017. “The Digital Agora of Social Media. Introduction.” Discourse, Context & Media 191 (October): 1–4.
Johansson, Marjut, Aki-Juhani Kyröläinen, Filip Ginter, Lotta Lehti, Attila Krizsán, and Veronika Laippala. 2018. “Opening Up #jesuisCharlie Anatomy of a Twitter Discussion with Mixed Methods.” Journal of Pragmatics 1291: 90–101.
Mancera, Ana, and Ana Pano. 2013. El discurso político en Twitter: Análisis de mensajes que “trinan”. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Naets, Hubert. 2018. “Techniques de collecte et d’archivage des tweets: Partage de pratiques et d’outils.” In Pérenniser l’éphémère. Archivage et médias sociaux. coll. Publications des archives de l’UCL, ed. by Aurore François, Anne Roekens, Véronique Fillieux and Caroline Derauw, 215–237. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia Eds.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective Publics. Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. USA: Oxford University Press.
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea, and Barbara De Cock. 2018. “Non-conforming Uses of #jesuisCharlie and Derived Hashtags on Twitter”. In Language and the new (instant) media (Cahiers du Cental 9), ed. by Louise-Amélie Cougnon, Barbara De Cock, and Cédrick Fairon, 99–106. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Smyrnaios, Nikos, and Pierre Ratinaud. 2017. “The Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Twitter: A Comparative Analysis of a Political Controversy in English and French.” Social Media + Society, January-March: 1–13.
Stark, Luke, and Kate Crawford. 2015. “The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect and Communication”. Social Media + Society July-December: 1–11.
Sumiala, Johanna, Minttu Tikka, Jukka Huhtamäki, and Katja Valaskivi. 2016. “#JeSuisCharlie: Towards a Multi-method Study of Hybrid Media Events.” Media and Communication 4(4): 97–108.
Wikström, Peter. 2014. “#srynotfunny: Communicative Functions of Hashtags on Twitter.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 271: 127–152.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Elyamany, Nashwa
Hernández-Riaño, Javier, Rodolfo Casadiego-Alzate, Javier A. Sánchez-Torres, Francisco-Javier Arroyo-Cañada, Ana María Argila-Irurita & María Luisa Solé-Moro
Frick, Karina
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
