Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 29:3 (2019) ► pp.357–383
The group in the self
A corpus-assisted discourse studies approach to personal and group communication at the European Parliament
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 22 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18026.cal
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18026.cal
Abstract
Drawing on theoretical approaches to personal/group behaviour, and informed by Michael Hoey’s priming theory, this paper presents a corpus-assisted discourse study of European Parliament interventions from 2004 to 2011. The study aims to identify the group in the self and the various selves in the individual. For the analysis, three corpora from the European Comparable and Parallel Corpus Archive are explored: EP_EN (with EP interventions: 26,959,446 tokens), HC (with House of Commons interventions: 70,567,728), and SandD_david_martin (with member of European Parliament – MEP – David Martin’s interventions: 116,781). The main tool of analysis is the keyword, as generated by WordSmith 7.0. The analysis proceeds in three stages: stage 1, where the EP_EN and HC wordlists are compared, resulting in EP key priming; stage 2, where the SandD_david_martin and HC wordlists are compared, exposing David Martin’s idiosyncratic productions; and stage 3, where the EP_EN and SandD_david_martin keyword lists are manually compared, leading to the identification of EP priming in David Martin’s interventions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Brief outline of personal and group behaviour according to SIT and SCT
- 1.2Brief outline of a corpus linguistics approach to personal and group communication: Priming theory through keyword analysis
- 2.Analysis of European Parliament plenary interventions and MEP David Martin’s production via keyword analysis
- 2.1Demarcation of context and genre
- 2.2Selection of a specific individual for analysis
- 2.3The European Comparable and Parallel Corpus as archive of corpora for analysis
- 2.4Stages of analysis
- 3.Results of analysis
- 3.1Stage 1: Comparison of proximal groups (EP_EN and HC) → Keyword List A: Stereotypical (key) group priming
- 3.2Stage 2: Comparison of proximal groups (SandD_david_martin and HC) → Keyword List B: Stereotypical (key) personal priming
- 3.3Stage 3: Comparison of EP_EN Keyword List A and SandD_david_martin Keyword List B → The group in the self and various selves in stereotypical personal production
- 4.Conclusions
References
References (27)
Ashforth, Blake, and Fred Mael. 1989. “Social Identity Theory and the Organization.” Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 20–39.
Baker, Paul, and Jesse Egbert (eds). 2016. Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus-Linguistic Research. London and New York: Routledge.
European Parliament. 2016. The European Parliament: The Citizens’ Voice in the EU. A Short Guide to the European Parliament. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Union, n.d. The EU in Brief. [URL] (accessed September 23, 2017).
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2018. “Keyness Analysis: Nature, Metrics and Techniques.” In Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review, ed. by Charlotte Taylor, and Anna Marchi, 224–257. London and New York: Routledge.
Gabrielatos, Costas, and Paul Baker. 2008. “Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press 1996–2005.” Journal of English Linguistics 36 (1): 5–38.
Gabrielatos, Costas, and Anna Marchi. 2012. “Keyness: Appropriate Metrics and Practical Issues.” In: CADS International Conference 2012. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies: More Than the Sum of Discourse Analysis and Computing? University of Bologna (Italy), 13–14 September 2012. Bologna and Siena: Corpus Linguistics SiBol.
. 2013. “Lexical Priming and Translation.” In Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Research and Applications, ed. by Alet Kruger, Kim Wallmach, and Jeremy Munday, 153–168. London: Continuum.
Hogg, Michael, and Domininc Abrams. 1988. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2009. “Corpora and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Paul Baker, 32–46. London: Continuum.
Martin, James, and Peter White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
McEnery, Tony. 2016. “Keywords.” In Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research, ed. by Paul Baker, and Jesse Egbert, 19–32. London and New York: Routledge.
Munday, Jeremy. 2012. Evaluation in Translation: Critical Points of Translator Decision-Making. New York: Routledge.
O’Keeffe, Anne, and Michael McCarthy. 2010. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.
Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor. 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2009. “In Search of a Bad Reference Corpus.” In What’s in a Word-List? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction, ed. by Dawn Archer, 79–92. Oxford: Ashgate Publishing.
Spears, Russell. 2011. “Group Identities: The Social Identity Perspective.” In Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, ed. by Seth J. Schwartz, Koen Luyckx, Vivian L. Vignoles, 201–224, New York: Springer.
Tajfel, Henri, and John Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations, ed. by William G. Austin, and Stephen Worchel, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Behavior, ed. by Stephen Worchel, and William G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.