Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 28:4 (2018) ► pp.599–616

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Negative existentials

A problem still unsolved

 | MTA-DE-SZTE Research Group for Theoretical Linguistics
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 23 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17026.vec
Abstract
Negative existentials containing empty NPs are understood colloquially as representing how things stand in the world. Moreover, utterances of such sentences seem to express propositions or thoughts that are informative and true. Standard static semantic theories cannot provide a straightforward account of these intuitive phenomena. In such frameworks, sentences with empty NPs are considered as being unable to express truth-evaluable contents. This paper investigates two alternative theories of negative existentials. A common feature of these theories is that they adopt a dynamic approach to meaning. I will argue that neither of these alternatives provides a reassuring solution to the apparent truth-conditional problem generated by the utterances of negative existentials.
Article outline
  • 1.Representing nothing: The contradictory features of negative existentials
  • 2.The dynamic semantic approach to negative existentials
  • 3.An alternative proposal: Static semantics with dynamic pragmatics
  • 4.Is there a way out?
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Adams, Fred, and Laura L. Dietrich. 2004. “What’s in an (Empty) Name?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 851: 125–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaver, David, and Elizabeth Coppock. 2015. “Definiteness and Determinacy.” Linguistics and Philosophy 381: 377–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, David. 2005. “Empty Names, Fictional Names, Mythical Names.” Nous 391: 596–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clapp, Lenny. 2009. “The Problem of Negative Existentials does not Exist: A Case for Dynamic Semantics.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1422–1434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gauker, Christopher. 2008. “Against Accommodation: Heim, Van Der Sandt, and the Presupposition Projection Problem.” Philosophical Perspectives 221: 171–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 2000. “Meaning in Motion.” In Reference and Anaphoric Relations, ed. by K. von Heusinger, and U. Egli, 47–76. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, Peter. 2015. Propositional Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. Thesis, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kertész, András, and Csilla Rákosi. 2012. Data and Evidence in Linguistics: A Plausible Argumentation Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroon, Frederick. 2003. “Quantified Negative Existentials.” Dialectica 571: 149–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Karen. 2017. “Dynamic Semantics.” Oxford Handbooks Online. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merricks, Trenton. 2015. Propositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mousavian, Seyed N. 2014. “Empty Names and Pragmatic Millianism.” Thought 31: 49–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, Hazel. 2010. “Presupposition in Local Contexts: Why Global Accommodation is not Enough.” Language at the University of Essex (LangUE), 2009. Proceedings, 70–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1995. “Domain Restriction in Dynamic Semantics.” In Quantification in Natural Languages, ed. by E. Bach et al., 661–700. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmon, Nathan. 1998. “Nonexistence.” Nous 321: 277–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2010. “Presuppositions and Local Contexts.” Mind 1191: 377–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2003. “Presupposition and Accommodation: Understanding the Stalnakerian Picture.” Philosophical Studies 1121: 251–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spewak, David C. 2016. “A Modulation Account of Negative Existentials.” Philosophia 441: 227–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. “Assertion.” Syntax and Semantics 91: 315–332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 1999. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. “Speaking of Fictional Characters.” Dialectica 571: 207–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yalcin, Seth. 2012. “Dynamic Semantics.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. ed. by G. Russell, and D. Graff Fara, 253–279. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vecsey, Zoltán. 2015. “Fiction and Representation.” SATS 161: 202–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. In Other Shoes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wyatt, Nicole. 2007. “The Pragmatics of Empty Names.” Dialogue 461: 663–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue