Article published In: Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Pragmatics 17:4] 2007
► pp. 647–658
Why are increments such elusive objects? An afterthought
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.03aue
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.03aue
It is argued that the type of unit expansions called ‘increments’ by Schegloff 1996 is too narrowly focused on English. While the structure of English makes it particularly suited for this kind of expansion, a typologically more satisfactory approach to unit expansion runs into problems if it remains on the syntactic plane alone. A full typology will have to take into account, not only prosody and semantics, but also action structure and pragmatics at large.
Keywords: unit expansion, TCU, Increment
References (7)
Auer, Peter (1991) Vom Ende deutscher Sätze. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 19.2: 139-157.
(1992) The neverending sentence: Rightward expansion in spoken language. In M. Kontra, and T. Váradi (eds.), Studies in Spoken Languages: English, German, Finno-Ugric.Budapest: Linguistic Institute at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp 41-59.
(1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 51-100.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In eaedem (eds), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, pp 14-38. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In: E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 52-133. BoP
Vorreiter, Susanne (2003) Turn continuations. Towards a cross-linguistic classification. INLIST 39 ([URL])
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Krug, Maximilian
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Uwe-A. Küttner & Chase Wesley Raymond
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Richard Ogden
Rönnqvist, Sara & Jan Lindström
Proske, Nadine & Arnulf Deppermann
2020. Right-dislocated complement clauses in German talk-in-interaction. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 275 ff.
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2020. Relative-clause increments and the management of reference. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 303 ff.
O’Grady, Gerard & Tom Bartlett
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinateshe- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2020. The insubordinate – subordinate continuum. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 87 ff.
Oloff, Florence & Martin Havlík
2018. An initial description of syntactic extensions in spoken Czech. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 28:3 ► pp. 361 ff.
Auer, Peter & Jan Lindström
Haselow, Alexander
Auer, Peter
2015. The temporality of language in interaction. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 27 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2015. A temporally oriented perspective on connectors in interactions. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 237 ff.
Tudini, Vincenza
Paul, Christine
Luke, Kang-kwong
Luke, Kang-kwong, Sandra A. Thompson & Tsuyoshi Ono
Hopper, Paul J.
Imo, Wolfgang
Imo, Wolfgang
2015. Temporality and syntactic structure. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 147 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.