Article published In: Relationality: Discursive constructions of Asian Pacific American identities
Edited by Adrienne Lo and Angela Reyes
[Pragmatics 14:2/3] 2004
► pp. 235–256
Evidentiality and morality in a Korean heritage language school
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.2-3.08lo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.2-3.08lo
Previous work on Korean grammar has claimed that one person can not have access to another person’s thoughts, feelings or sensations, as indicated by the use of evidential markers. By looking at cases in which a teacher at a Korean heritage language school claims to read her students’ minds with a high degree of certainty, I demonstrate how expressions of epistemic stance relate to moral evaluation. Speakers portray their access to the thoughts and sensations of individuals who they deem morally worthy as more distant and uncertain. When individuals are evaluated as morally suspect, however, speakers represent these persons’ emotions, thoughts and sensations as self-evident displays of affect. This paper thus argues that evidential marking in Korean interaction is a social act through which interlocutors morally evaluate others.
Keywords: Evidentiality, Korean language, Epistemic stance, Subjectivity, Morality
References (36)
Abelmann, Nancy (2003) The melodrama of mobility : Women, talk, and class in contemporary South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Agha, Asif (2004) Epistemic stance. Ms.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2003) Evidentiality in Tariana. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 131-164. BoP
Benveniste, Emile (1971) Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek.
Cha, Jae-Ho (1994) Aspects of individualism and collectivism in Korea. In Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Çigdem. Kagitçibasi, Sang Chin Choi and Gene Yoon (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 157-174.
Choi, Soonja (1991) Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language 111: 93-119.
de Reuse, Wilhem J. (2003) Evidentiality in Western Apache (Athabaskan). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 79-100.
Dredge, C. Paul (1983) What is politeness in Korean speech? Korean Linguistics 31: 21-32.
Fox, Barbara A. (2001) Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11.2: 167-192.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. BoP
Hanks, William F. (1990) Referential practice : Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoffman, Diane M. (1999) Lanterns on the river: Essays on life and culture in contemporary South Korea. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Iwasaki, Shoichi (1993) Subjectivity in grammar and discourse: Theoretical considerations and a case study of Japanese spoken discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kamio, Akio (1995) Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 24.3: 235-264. BoP
(1997) Territory of information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. BoP
Kim, Ki-Hong (1978) Cultural and linguistic variables in the language of emotion of Americans and Koreans. In Chin-u Kim, Samuel Elmo Martin, Ho-min Sohn and Seok C. Song (eds.), Papers in Korean linguistics. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press, pp. 259-267.
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1973) Where epistemology, style and grammar meet: A case study from the Japanese. In Paul Kiparsky and Stephen R. Anderson (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp. 377-391.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1985) Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 109-150.
Lee, Hyo Sang (1993) Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics 4.2: 135-167.
Lyons, John (1982) Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: John Wiley, pp. 101-124.
Martin, Samuel Elmo, Yang Ha Lee, and Sung-Un Chang (1967) A Korean-English dictionary. New Haven. Yale University Press.
Maynard, Senko K. (1993) Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. BoP
McLendon, Sally (2003) Evidentials in eastern Pomo with a comparative survey of the category in other Pomoan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 101-129.
Mushin, Ilana (2001) Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. BoP
Park, Mae-Ran (1990) Conflict avoidance in social interaction: A sociolinguistic comparison of the Korean and Japanese honorific systems. In Hajime Hoji (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 111-128.
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage (2004) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Manuscript.
Scheibman, Joanne (2002) Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. BoP
Silverstein, Michael (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Keith Basso and Henry A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-56.
Sohn, Ho-Min (1986a) Strategies of indirection in Korean. In Linguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 266-279
(1986b) Power and solidarity in the Korean language. In Linguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 389-410.
Sohn, Sung-Ock S., and Mee-Jeong Park (2003) Indirect quotations in Korean conversations. In Patricia Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 105-118.
Suzuki, Satoko (1998) Tte and nante: Markers of psychological distance in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 29.4: 429-462. BoP
Yum, June O. (1987) Korean philosophy and communication. In D. Lawrence Kincaid (eds.), Communication theory : Eastern and western perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 71-86.
Yum, Young-Ok, and Daniel J. Canary (2003) Maintaining relationships in Korea and the United States: Features of Korean culture that affect relational maintenance beliefs and behaviors. In Daniel J. Canary and Marianne Dainton (eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 277-296.
Cited by (25)
Cited by 25 other publications
Becker, Ava
Lactaoen, Eduardo Salinas
2025. Epistemic authority, authenticity, and the Filipino conyo. Language, Culture and Society 7:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Song, David Shuang
Macias, Heather
Fukuda, Chie
2022. Resistance against being formulated as cultural other. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 429 ff.
Suh, Sora
Song, Juyoung
Song, Juyoung
Xiao-Desai, Yang & Ka F. Wong
Xiao-Desai, Yang & Ka F. Wong
Cekaite, Asta
Cook, Haruko Minegishi
Wortham, Stanton & Angela Reyes
He, Agnes Weiyun
He, Agnes Weiyun
He, Agnes Weiyun
He, Agnes Weiyun
He, Agnes Weiyun
He, Agnes Weiyun
He, Agnes Weiyun
Rymes, Betsy
Woolard, Kathryn A.
Wortham, Stanton
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
