Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 14:1 (2004) ► pp.31–53
The functions of formulaic speech in the L2 class
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.1.01gir
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.1.01gir
This study deals with Formulaic Speech (FS) usage in the context of the partial L2 immersion class. It tries to define and classify FS according to its functions. The fact that learners resort to FS shows that second language production is not only based on the construction of sentences from scratch but also on the integration of formulaic sequences in discourse. But what is the use of FS? What are the possible functions it performs?
We attempt to show that FS makes up for a lack of structural knowledge and might therefore be used as a learning strategy in the acquisition of structure. Then we consider the psycholinguistic function of FS and try to demonstrate that it might be a pre-planning strategy and a way for the learner to economize effort on processing and thus focus on his or her learning of the language. Finally, the paper analyzes the communicative function of FS and its role in the relation between speaker and hearer, and suggests that it might play a part in the development of pragmatic competence.
References (41)
Altenberg, B. (1994) On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word combinations. In Cowie (ed.), 1994.
Arends, J., P. Muysken, &. N. Smith (eds.) Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baigent, M. (1996) Speaking in Chunks: An investigation into the use of multi-word phrases in spoken language by advanced learners of English. MSc Thesis in Teaching English, Aston University. [URL]
Bohn, O. (1986) Formulas, frame structures, and stereotypes in early syntactic development: Some new evidence from L2 acquisition. Linguistics 241: 185-202.
Cook, V. et al. (1993) Linguistics and Second Language acquisition. London: Macmillan. BoP
Cowie, A. (ed.) (1994) Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Girard, M., & C. Sionis (2003) Formulaic Speech in the L2 Class: An Attempt at identification and Classification. Pragmatics 13.2: 231-251. BoP
Givón, T. (1979) From Discourse to Syntax. Grammar as a processing strategy. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and syntax (Syntax and Semantics 12) New York: Academic Press, pp. 81-111.
Hakuta, K. (1974) Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning 241: 287-97.
Hamers, J.F., and M. Blanc (1989) Bilinguality and Bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Hatch, E.M. (1972) Some Studies In Language Learning. UCLA Workpapers on Teaching English as a Second Language 61: 29-36.
Kecskes, I. (2000) A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics. 32.6: 605-625. BoP
Krashen, S , and R. Scarcella (1978) On routines and patterns in second language acquisition and performance. Language Learning 281: 283-300.
Krashen, S., M. Long, and R. Scarcella. (1979) Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 131: 573-82.
Larsen-Freeman, D., and M.H. Long (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman. BoP
Lehtonen, J.(1985) Foreign Language Acquisition and the Development of Automaticity. In H. Dechert (ed.), 1990. Current Trends in European Second Language Acquisition Research. Clevendon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Manuel, J. (1990) Ecole Active Bilingue: Teacher’s guide. Paris R.E.M.I. Nathan.
Nattinger, J., and J. De Carrico (1992) Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Peters, A.M. (1976) Language learning strategies: Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language 531: 560-73.
Porto, M. (1998) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Forum 36.3: 22. [URL]
Radford, A. (1997) Syntactic theory & the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
.(1998) Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raupach, M. (1984) Formulae in second language production. In H. Dechert et al.. (eds.), Second Language Productions. Tübingen: Narr.
Rescorla, L., and S. Okuda (1987) Modular patterns in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 81: 281-308.
Schmidt, R.W. (1983) Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In N. Wolfson and E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House, pp. 137-74.
Singh, I. (2000) Pidgins and Creoles, an Introduction. London: Arnold. BoP
Wagner-Gough, J. (1975) Comparative Studies in second language learning. CAL ERIC/CLL Series on Languages and Linguistics 26.
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1976) The second time around: Cognitive and social strategies in SLA. Language Learning 321: 53-68.
Wray, A. (2000) Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics 21.4: 463-489.
. (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Alrwais, Saleh
Aline, David & Yuri Hosoda
Safont, Pilar
Song, Sooho
Safont Jordà, María-Pilar & Laura Portolés Falomir
2016. Pragmatic functions of formulaic speech in three different languages. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 4:2 ► pp. 225 ff.
Stephen, Christine, Joanna McPake, Irene Pollock & Wilson McLeod
2016. Early years immersion. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 4:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Yeh, Shu-Han
Tang, Jingwei
JIANG, NAN & TATIANA M. NEKRASOVA
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
