Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 13:3 (2003) ► pp.423–450

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Reanalysis of contrastive -wa in Japanese

Perspectives from newspaper articles

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2003
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.3.04yam
This paper examines the behavior of contrastive –wa in Japanese written discourse. While supporting its local nature (Clancy and Downing 1987), the paper argues, based on a survey of newspapers, that localness alone is not sufficient to understand the nature of contrast. It proposes that the use of contrastive –wa is motivated by how the writer perceives the world, or what Chafe (1994) calls ‘conscious experience’. We propose literal opposition, evaluation, association, and conflict as its main components. In the final part, the paper relates the results to the recent study on Contrastive Topic (Lee 1999, 2000, 2003), stating that the CT-approach is still unable to account for the entire range of phenomena discovered. The paper suggests that the discrepancies arise because of the fact that natural data integrates the writer’s context-specific intentions, to which priority is not given in formalistic approaches.
References (44)
Caenepeel, Mimo (1995) Aspect and text structure. Linguistics 331: 213-253.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia (1994) Metapragmatics. In R.E. Asher (ed.), The Enchyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 41.Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 2461-2466.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25-55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., and Pamela Downing (1987) The use of wa as a cohesion marker in Japanese oral narratives. In J. Hinds, et al.. (eds.), Perspectives on topicalization. The case of Japanese ‘wa’. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins, pp. 3-56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotter, Collen (2001) Discourse and media. In D. Schiffirn, et al.. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 416-36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (1985) Structures of news in the press. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse and communication. New approaches to the analyses of mass media discourse and communication. Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter, pp. 69-93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dooley, Robert, and Stephen H. Levinsohn (2001) Analyzing Discourse. A Manual of Basic Concepts. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, Gill (1989) Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse. Word 40.1-2: 201-21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1983) Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-language study. John Benjamins. Amsterdam/New York, pp. 3-41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984) Syntax: A functional typological introduction, vol 11. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, K. Jeanette (1985) ‘Shared knowledge’ and topicality. Journal of Pragmatics 91: 83-107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinds, John (1987) Thematization, assumed familiarity, staging, and syntactic binding in Japanese. In Hinds et al. 1987, pp. 83-106.
Hinds, John, Senko K. Maynard, Shoichi Iwasaki (eds.) (1987) Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R (1990) Topic Drift. Conversational Organization and its Development. In B. Doral (ed.), Conversational Organization and its Development. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp. 3-22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress (1993) Language as Ideology [second edition]. London: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inoue, Kazuko (1979) Furui jouhou atarasii jouhou [Old information and new information]. Gengo 8.10: 22-34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982) An interface of syntax, semantics, and discourse structures. Lingua 571: 259-300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi (2002) Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther (1983) Linguistic processes and the mediation of ‘reality’: The politics of newspaper language. International Journal of Sociology of Language 401: 43-57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu (1973) The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, Shigeyuki (1972-73) The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 91: 153-85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987) A study of the so-called topic wa in passages from Tolstoi, Lawrence, and Faulkner. In Hinds, et al.. (eds.), Perspectives on Topicalization. The Case of Japanese ‘wa’.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 143-61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990) The categorical and the thetic judgment reconsidered. In Mulligan, Kevin (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 77-88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald (2000) Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: A re-examination of Eve Sweetser’s three-level approach. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. and B. Kortmann (eds.), Cause Condition Concession Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspective.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 235-256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin (1999) Contrastive Topic: A locus of the interface. Evidence from Korean and English. In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics interface from different points of view, Elsevier, pp. 317-342.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000a) Contrastive predicates and conventional scales. In A. Okrent & J. Boyle (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 361: 243-257.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b) Topic, Contrastive Topic and Focus: What’s on our minds. Journal of Cognitive Science 11: 21-38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003) Contrastive Topic and proposition structure. In A.M. Di Schiullo (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45-371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per, and Natascha Korolija (1997) Coherence in Multi-Party Conversation. Episodes and Contexts in Interaction. T. Givón (ed.), Conversation. cognitive, communicative and social perspectives.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 167-205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E (1996) The Grammar of discourse [second edition]. New York/London: Plenum Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher (1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko (1987) Thematization as a staging device in the Japanese narrative. In Hinds, et al.. (1987), pp. 57-82.
(2002) In the name of a vessel: Emotive perspectives in the reporting of the Ehime Maru-Greeneville collision in a Japanese newspaper. Linguistics 40.5: 1047-1086.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob (2001) Pragmatics. An introduction. [second Edition]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru (1987) Wa and the wh phrase. In Hinds, et al.., pp. 185-217.
Nagano, Masaru (1972) Bunshouron sousetsu [Introduction to the sentence structure]. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noda, Naofumi (1996) Wa to ga [Wa and ga]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan (1992) Aspects of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language. On cognition, functionalism, and grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. A. (2000) Viewpoints and polysemy: linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.), Cause Condition Concession Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 257-281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. (1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1985) Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In D.R. Olson, N. Torrance, A. Hildyard (eds.), Literacy, language, and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich (1997) Emotions and emotional language in English and German news stories. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), The Language of emotions, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 307-328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fukuda, Chie
2022. Resistance against being formulated as cultural other. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue