Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 13:2 (2003) ► pp.211–230
On relative clauses and locative expressions in English existential sentences
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.2.01bre
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.2.01bre
In an influential paper, Fox & Thompson (1990) argue that the grammar of relative clauses in spoken American English is affected by interactive and cognitive factors pertaining to the communication situation. Existential sentences containing a relative clause as well as an overt locative expression figure prominently in their analysis. The present paper examines Fox & Thompson’s analysis of such sentences in the light of a wide range of data. It is shown that the generalizations they make on the basis of their limited corpus (25 tokens) rest on false premises. Their analysis fails to take account of some of the most salient properties inherent in existential sentences in all varieties of English; it also disregards relevant cross-linguistic data. An alternative analysis is offered.
References (52)
Abbott, Barbara (1997) Definiteness and existentials. Language 731: 103-108. BoP
Anderson, John (1971) The grammar of case: Towards a localistic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, C.L. (1995) Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 711: 63-101.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, & Edward Finegan (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bloom, Paul, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel, & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.) (1996) Language and space. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press. BoP
Bolinger, Dwight (1977) Meaning and form. London & New York: Longman. BoP
Breivik, Leiv Egil (1981) On the interpretation of existential there
. Language 571: 1-25. BoP
(1997a) There in space and time. In Heinrich Ramisch and Kenneth Wynne (eds.), Language in time and space: Studies in honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the occasion of his 60th birthday.Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 32-45.
(1997b) On the interrelation of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics: A study of locative/temporal expressions in existential sentences in the LOB Corpus. In Udo Fries, Viviane Müller, & Peter Schneider (eds.), From Ælfric to the New York Times: Studies in English corpus linguistics. (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, 19.) Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 1-10.
(1999) On the pragmatic function of relative clauses and locative expressions in existential sentences in the LOB Corpus. In Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson. (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, 26.)Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 121-135.
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule (1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Chafe, Wallace (1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 21-51.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BoP
Dillon, George L., Linda Coleman, Jeanne Fahnestock, & Michael Agar (1985) Review article on Brown & Yule (1983), Leech(1983), and Levinson (1983). Language 611: 446-460.
Downing, Pamela, & Michael Noonan (1995) Word order in discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ebeling, Jarle (1999) Presentative constructions in English and Norwegian: A corpus-based contrastive study. Doctoral dissertation. (Acta Humaniora, 68.) Oslo: Department of British and American Studies, University of Oslo.
Erdmann, Peter (1976) There sentences in English: A relational study based on a corpus of written texts. (Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften, 6.) Munich: Tuduv.
Fauconnier, Gilles (1985) Mental spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. BoP
Firbas, Jan (1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Fox, Barbara A., & Sandra A. Thompson (1990) A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 661: 297-316.
Frawley, William (1992) Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. BoP
Geis, Michael L. (1995) Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geisler, Christer (1995) Relative infinitives in English. (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia, 91.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Givón, Talmy (1976) Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York & London: Academic Press, pp. 149-188.
(1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 11. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(1990) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 21. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(ed.) (1994) Voice and inversion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, & Ron Zacharski (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 691: 274-307.
Hannay, Michael (1985) English existentials in functional grammar. (Functional Grammar Series, 3.) Dordrecht: Foris.
Haspelmath, Martin (1997) Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 3.) Munich & Newcastle: LINCOM EUROPA.
Hopper, Paul J., & Sandra A. Thompson (1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 561: 251- 299. BoP
Huddleston, Rodney, & Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johansson, Christine (1995) The relativizers whose and of which in present-day English. (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia, 90.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Kuno, Susumu (1971) The position of locatives in existential sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 333-378.
Lakoff, George (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. BoP
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983) Principles of pragmatics. London & New York: Longman. BoP
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP.
Lumsden, Michael (1988) Existential sentences: Their structure and meaning. London, New York, & Sydney: Croom Helm.
Lyons, John (1967) A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language 31: 390–396.
(1975) Deixis as the source of reference. In Edward L. Keenan (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language. London & New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61-83.
(1977). Semantics, vols. 1-21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
McNally, Louise (1997) A semantics for the English existential construction. New York & London: Garland.
Milsark, Gary Lee (1974) Existential sentences in English. MIT dissertation. [Published in the series Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics, New York & London: Garland, 1979.]
Prince, Ellen (1981) Toward a typology of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223-255.
(1988) The discourse functions of Yiddish expletive + subject-postposing. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 21: 176-194. BoP
(1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fundraising text.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 295-325.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman. BoP
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Garachana Camarero, Mar & Axel Hernández Díaz
2020. From semantics to grammar. In Changes in meaning and function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25], ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
