Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 12:3 (2002) ► pp.257–271

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Personal perspective in TV news interviews

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2002
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.12.3.01alb
Two interviews by Christiane Amanpour televized September 8, 2000 on CNN, one with Ehud Barak and one with Yasser Arafat were analyzed for indicators of personal perspective. Generally, use of the same indicators as in Suleiman, O’Connell, & Kowal (2002) was confirmed: Number of syllables spoken; use of first-person singular and plural pronominals and second-person pronominals; hesitations; smooth and interruptive turn transitions; and questions posed by interviewees. The interview with Arafat was extraordinarily agonistic, as manifested in his excessive use of first-person singular and second-person pronominals, hesitations, questions, and interruptions. For her part, Amanpour incited the shift to agonism with her provocative questioning. She then moved toward a more personal perspective by speaking proportionally more and by using more first-person singular pronominals and hesitations, all the while still maintaining her professional style of smooth turn transition. The dialogical character of personal perspective is discussed.
References (38)
Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (2001) The discourse of medical encounters. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 453-469.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981) The dialogical imagination: Four essays (trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist; ed. M. Holquist). Austin, TX: Texas University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., S. Conrad, & R. Reppen (1998) Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, P., & C. Schaffner (1997) Discourse and politics. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2). London: Sage, pp. 206-230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H.H. (1994) Discourse in production. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 985-1021.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, S., & J. Heritage (2002) The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (1995) Pronominal choice, identity, and solidarity in political discourse. Text 151: 379-410.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Der Tagesspiegel (2002) Zurechtweisung vom General. (March 31, 2002: 51).
Farr, R.M. (1984) Interviewing: An introduction to the social psychology of the interview. In C.I. Cooper & P. Makin (eds.), Psychology for managers (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan, pp. 176-194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrod, S., & M.J. Pickering (1999) Issues in language processing. In S. Garrod & M.J. Pickering (eds.), Language processing. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press, pp. 1-11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1967) Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graumann, C. (1989) Perspective setting and taking in verbal interaction. In R. Dietrich & C.F. Graumann (eds.), Language processing in social context. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 95-122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harre, R. (2001) The discursive turn in social psychology. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 608-706.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T.M. (2002) Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, W. (1890/1983) The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kowal, S., H.-C. Barth, H. Egemann, G. Gasulic, C. Kogel, N. Lippold, A. Pfeil, & D.C. O'Connell (1998) Unterbrechungen in Medieninterviews: Geschlechtstypisches Gesprachsverhalten? Germanistische Linguistik139-1401: 279-299.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002) Interjektionen im Gesprach. Zeitschrift fur Semiotik 241: xx-xx.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maitland, K., & G. Wilson (1987) Ideological conflict and pronominal resolution. Journal of Pragmatics 111:495-512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O'Connell, D.C., & S. Kowal (1998) Orality and literacy in public discourse: An interview of Hannah Arendt. Journal of Pragmatics 301: 543-564.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O'Connell, D.C., S. Kowal, & E.J. Dill III (in press) A Dialogical Approach to TV News Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 341.
Rommetveit, R. (l974)On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990) On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 83-104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D., D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.) (2001) The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suleiman, C. (1999) Pronouns and self presentation in public discourse: Yasser Arafat as case study. In Yasir Suleiman (ed.), Language and society in the Middle East and North Africa: Studies in variation and identity . London: Curzon, pp. 104-121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000) Pronoun use in television interviews: Social interaction and the Middle East peace process . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Suleiman, C., D.C. O'Connell, & S. Kowal (2002) "If you and I, if we, in this later day, lose that sacred fire..."; Perspective in political interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 311:281-299.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urban, G. (1988) The pronominal pragmatics of nuclear war discourse. Multilingua 71: 67-93.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Langenhove, L., & R. Harre (l993) Positioning and autobiography: Telling your life. In N. Coupland & J. Nussbaum (eds.), Discourse and life-span development (Vol. 41). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 81-89.
Webster's ninth new collegiate dictionary. (l983) Springfield, MA: A Meriam-Webster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (2001) Political discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 398-415.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Gupta, Brijendra
2021. Protein Interaction and Disease Gene Prioritization. In Health Informatics: A Computational Perspective in Healthcare [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 932], ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Choenni, Chan E. S.
2020. Hindostani Women in Suriname: From Coolies to Matriarchs. In Indentured and Post-Indentured Experiences of Women in the Indian Diaspora, ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Abdollahi, Behnoush & Olfa Nasraoui
2018. Transparency in Fair Machine Learning: the Case of Explainable Recommender Systems. In Human and Machine Learning [Human–Computer Interaction Series, ], ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Mitchell, Philip & James Stewart
2017. Who are We?. Journalism Practice 11:4 ► pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Suleiman, Camelia & Daniel C. O’Connell
2008. Gender Differences in the Media Interviews of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 37:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Suleiman, Camelia & Daniel C. O’Connell
2022. Perspective in the discourse of war. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
2006. The Research Status of Clayman and Heritage’s (2002) The News Interview. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
2022. Laughter in the film The third man . Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
O’Connell, Daniel C., Sabine Kowal & Carie Ageneau
2005. Interjections in Interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
2005. An integrated approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis in the study of identity in speeches. Discourse & Society 16:1 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
2014. On the use of ‘we’ in Flemish World War II interviews. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue