Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 11:4 (2001) ► pp.401–420
Definiteness and reflexivity
Indexing socially shared experience
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.4.03lau
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.4.03lau
This paper examines the use of definite and indefinite noun phrases in everyday conversations in Finnish and English to establish meaning and to alter and build context in interaction. The paper shows that participants in conversation use the formal contrast between definite and indefinite NPs not only to express identifiability and non-identifiability of the referent to their addressees, but that they also use it dynamically to make claims about socially shared reality, to create referents in discourse and to build a novel identity for existing referents, to actively construct frames and create roles within them, and to reorganize the participant structure of a speech event.
Keywords: Definiteness, Reference, Interaction, Roles, Participant structure, Presupposition, Frames
References (40)
Burton-Roberts, Noel (1989) The Limits to Debate: A Revised Theory of Semantic Presupposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Chafe, Wallace (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25-55.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BoP
Christophersen, Paul (1939) The Articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.
Clark, Herbert H. (1977) Bridging. In P.N. Johnson-Laird and P.C. Wason (eds.), Thinking. Readings in Cognitive Science.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 411-420.
Clark, Herbert H. and Susan E. Haviland (1977) Comprehension and the Given-New Contract. In Roy O. Freedle (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex pp. 1-40.
Clark, Herbert H. and Catherine R. Marshall (1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber and Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10-63.
DuBois, John W. (1980) Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In Wallace Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories: Cultural, cognitive and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 203-274.
. (2000) Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. CD-ROM. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. [[URL]]
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino and Susanna Cumming (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane E. Edwards and Martin D. Lambert (eds.), Transcription and Coding Methods for Language Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Donnellan, Keith (1971) Reference and definite descriptions. In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100-114.
Erkü, Feride and Jeanette K. Gundel (1987) The pragmatics of indirect anaphors. In Jef Verschueren and Marcella Bertucelli-Papi (eds.), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 533-545.
Epstein, Richard (1999) Roles, Frames and Definiteness. In Karen van Hoek, Andrej A. Kibrik, and Leo Noordman (eds.), Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 53-74.
Fauconnier, Gilles (1985) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Reprinted 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(1997) Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. MetBib
Fillmore, Charles J. (1982) Frame Semantics. InLinguistics in the Morning Calm
. Seoul: Hanshin, pp. 111-137.
Fox, Barbara (1987) Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Frege, Gottlob (1892) Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeischrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik. 1001: 22-50. Also in P.T. Geach and M. Black. 1952. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 56-78.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 691: 274-307.
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell. BoP
Hawkins, John A. (1978). Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm. BoP
Heim, Irene (1983) File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christopher Schwartze and Armin von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation in Language.Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 164-189.
Hintikka, Jaakko and Lauri Carlson (1977) Pronouns of laziness in game-theoretical linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 4(1/2): 1-29.
Karttunen, Lauri (1976) Discourse referents. In James D. McCawley (ed.),
Syntax and Semantics, vol. 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground . New York: Academic Press, pp. 363-385.
Lambrecht, Knud (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Laury, Ritva (1997). Demonstratives in Interaction: The emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. BoP
(2001) Definiteness. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola sstman, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen (eds.),
Handbook of Pragmatics, 1999 installment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lyons, Christopher (1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Marmaridou, Sophia S.A. (2000) Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. BoP
Okamoto, Shigeko (1999) Situated politeness: Competing concerns about the use of honorifics in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics 9.1: 51-74.
Partee, Barbara Hall (1972) Opacity, coreference and pronouns. In Davidson, D. and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 415-441.
Pekarek, Simona (1998) Deixis and the interactional construction of context. In: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 5.1: 127-138.
Prince, Ellen (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223-255.
Sakahara, Shigeru (1996) Roles and identificational copular sentences. In Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, Worlds and Grammar.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 262-289.
Sbis B, Marina (1999) Ideology and the persuasive use of presupposition. In Jef Verschueren (ed.), Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference. Vol. I1. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association, pp. 495-509.
Silverstein, Michael (1981) The Limits of Awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Papers 841. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Lab.
Strawson, Peter F. (1950) On referring. Mind 591: 320-344. BoP
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rudd, Philip W.
2022. Weapons of mass destruction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 499 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
