Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 11:3 (2001) ► pp.223–262
Displays of concession in university faculty meetings
Culture and interaction in Japanese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.3.01saf
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.11.3.01saf
In light of the tendency in studies of Japanese discourse and communication to account for patterns of social interaction in terms of cultural concepts such as wa (“harmony”), omoiyari (“empathy”), and enryo (“restraint”), this report sets out to demonstrate how much of an endogenously produced, local achievement social interaction can be in Japanese. To do so, the techniques and principles of conversation analysis are employed to describe how a particular social action, the expression of concession to statements of opposition, is produced by participants in a set of Japanese university faculty meetings. Although it is suggested that the very direct and explicit design of the concession displays could be explained in terms of concepts such as wa and/or enryo, it is nonetheless argued that the interactional significance of this action can be best understood by undertaking a detailed, sequential analysis of the interaction. The analysis itself is divided into two parts: First it is demonstrated that the concessions are products of the participants’ close attendance to and monitoring of the details of the unfolding interaction; second it is shown that instead of turning to pre-determined cultural concepts to account for the trajectory of the interaction, it is possible to understand the concession displays by situating them within the flow of the interaction itself.
References (43)
Barnlund, Dean (1989) Communicative styles of Japanese and Americans. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Boden, Deirdre (1994) The Business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press. BoP
Boden, Deirdre, & Don H. Zimmerman (eds.) (1991) Talk & social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Drew, Paul, & John Heritage (eds.) (1992) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Fox, Barbara, Makoto Hayashi, & Robert Jasperson (1996) Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, and S. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar.Cambridge University Press, pp. 185-237.
Goffman, Erving (1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. BoP
Goodwin, Charles (1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press. BoP
Hayashi, Makoto (1994) A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japanese conversation. In N. Akatsuka (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 4. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 77-94.
(1999) Where grammar and interaction meet: A study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies 22.(2-4): 475-499. BoP
Hayashi, Makoto, & Junko Mori (1998) Co-construction in Japanese revisited: We do "finish each others sentences". In N. Akatsuka, H. Hoji, S. Iwasaki, S. Sohn, and S. Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 7. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 77-93.
Heath, Christian (1984) Talk and recipiency: Sequential organization in speech and body movement. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247-265.
Heritage, John (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson J. Heritageand (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299-345.
(1998) Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 271: 291-334. BoP
Hester, Stephen, & Peter Eglin (eds.) (1997) Culture in action: Studies in membership category analysis. Washington D.C.: University Press of America. BoP
Hutchby, Ian (1996) Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Iwasaki, Shoichi (1997) The Northridge earthquake conversations: The floor structure and the ‘loop’ sequence in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 281: 661-693. BoP
Kendon, Adam (1982) The organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction: Observations on the development of a methodology. In K. Scherer P. Ekmanand (eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 440-505.
Lerner, Gene, & Tomoyo Takagi (1999) On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese practices. Journal of Pragmatics 311: 49-75. BoP
Locastro, Virginia (1987) Aizuchi: A Japanese conversational routine. In L. Smith (ed.), Discourse across cultures. New York: Prentice Hall, pp. 101-113.
Lynch, Michael (2000) The ethnomethodological foundations of conversation analysis. Text 20.41: 517-532. BoP
Maynard, Senko (1986) On back-channel behavior in Japanese and English casual conversation. Linguistics 241: 1079-1108. BoP
(1989) Japanese conversation: Self-contextualization, structure, and interactional management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Mori, Junko (1999) Negotiating agreement and disagreement in Japanese: Connective expressions and turn construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Pomerantz, Anita (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-101.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Language 501: 697-735. BoP
Saft, Scott (1998) Some uses and meanings of utterance initial iya in Japanese Discourse. In N. Akatsuka, H. Hoji, S. Iwasaki, S.O. Sohn, and S. Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics Vol. 71. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 121-137.
(2000) Arguing in the institution: Context, culture, and conversation analysis in a set of Japanese university faculty meetings. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
(2001a) Concession displays in arguments and disagreements that occur in Japanese discourse: Unique cultural style or situated interactional achievement. In E. Németh (ed.), Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference. Antwerp: IPrA, pp. 496-507.
(2001b) Acknowledgement tokens and arguments in Japanese university faculty meetings. Paperpresented at the IIEMCA conference on ‘Orders of Ordinary Action’. July 9-11, Manchester, UK.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1992) Introduction in Harvey Sacks’ Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. IX-LXII.
Smith, Robert J. (1983) Japanese society: Tradition, self, and the social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tanaka, Hiroko (1999) Turn-taking in Japanese conversation: A study in grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2000) Turn projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33.11: 1-38. BoP
Watanabe, Suwako (1993) Cultural differences in framing: American and Japanese group discussions. In D. Tannen (ed.), Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176-209.
White, Sheida (1989) Back-channels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society 181: 59-77. BoP
Wierzbicka, Anna (1991) Japanese key words and core cultural values. Language in Society 201: 333-385. BoP
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Zimmerman, Erica
Raclaw, Joshua & Cecilia E. Ford
Ebsworth, Miriam Eisenstein & Nobuko Kodama
Schmitt, Reinhold
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
