Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 28:1 (2018) ► pp.29–60

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

To be or not to be your son’s father/mother

A cognitive-pragmatic perspective on terms of address in Najdi and Tunisian Arabic

 | King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
 | King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
 | King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 13 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.00001.ben
Abstract
The current article offers a comparative account of the address system of two dialects of Arabic, Najdi and Tunisian Arabic. Capitalizing on the theory of Idealized Cognitive Model, the article defends the view that the two systems display Idealized models, which are central to the system, and non-Idealized models, which are peripheral to it. Najdi Arabic includes Idealized terms such as first names, teknonyms, and kinship terms while non-Idealized models include a battery of terms of address. Tunisian Arabic Idealized models hinge on Si/Lalla + first names, first names, and kinship terms while non-Idealized models make use of endeared first names, kinship terms, and diminished kinship terms. The two systems are shown to differ at the level of types of encounter (including formality, closeness, and deference), availability of address options, social horizontality-verticality, and use of metaphor and metonymy.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.The theory of idealized cognitive models
  • 2.Overview of terms of address
  • 3.Najdi Arabic address system
    • 3.1Propositional structure of Najdi Arabic address system
      • 3.1.1Idealized Cognitive Models
      • 3.1.2Non-Idealized Cognitive Models
    • 3.2Image-schematic structure of Najdi Arabic address system
    • 3.3Metaphorical mappings of Najdi Arabic address system
    • 3.4Metonymical mappings of Najdi Arabic address system
  • 4.Tunisian Arabic address system
    • 4.1Propositional structure of the Tunisian Arabic address system
      • 4.1.1Idealized Cognitive Models
      • 4.1.2Non-idealized cognitive models
    • 4.2Image-schematic structure of the Tunisian Arabic address system
    • 4.3Metaphorical mappings of the Tunisian Arabic address system
    • 4.4Metonymical mappings of the Tunisian Arabic address system
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (50)
References
Agha, Asif. 1994. “Honorification.” Annual Review of Anthropology 231: 277–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, Mahmoud A. 2003. “Address Norms in Jordanian Arabic: A Sociolinguistic Perspective.” Grazer Linguistische Studien 591: 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alrabaa, Sami. 1985. “The Use of Address Pronouns by Egyptian Adults: A Sociolinguistic Study.” Journal of Pragmatics 91: 645–657. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barakat, Halim. 1993. The Arab World: Society, Culture, and State. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bin Towairesh, Abdullah. 2012. “The Use of Term of Address in the City of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.” Ph.D. dissertation: University of Queensland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bratt Paulston, Christina. 1976. “Pronouns of Address in Swedish: Social Class Semantics and a Changing System.” Language in Society 5 (3): 359–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Friederike. 1988. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by T. A. Sebeok, 253–276. Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 2009. “Address in Intercultural Communication Across Languages.” Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (3): 395–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Heinz-Leo Kretzenbacher, Catrin Norrby, and Doris Schüpbach. 2006. “Perceptions of Variation and Change in German and Swedish Address.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (3): 287–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El Guindi, Fadwa. 2012. “Milk and Blood: Kinship among Muslim Arabs in Qatar.” Anthropos 1071: 545–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El Guindi, Fadwa, and Wesam Al-Othman. 2013. “Transformationality and Dynamicality of Kinship Structure.” Structure and Dynamics 6 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Hanquan, and J. H. Heng. 1983. “Social Changes and Changing Address Norms in China.” Language in Society 12 (4): 495–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farghal, Mohammed, and Abdullah Shakir. 1994. “Kin Terms and Titles of Address as Relational Social Honorifics in Jordanian Arabic.” Anthropological Linguistics 36 (2): 240–253Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. 1990. The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feghali, Ellen. 1997. “Arab Cultural Communication Patterns.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 21 (3): 345–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Miriam, R. L. Petruck, Josef Ruppenhofer, and A. Wright. 2003. “Framenet in Action: The Case of Attaching.” International Journal of Lexicography 16 (3): 297–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1989. Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. Hillsdale, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1992. Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Doug. 2004. “The Universal Psychology of Kinship: Evidence from Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (5): 211–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasanga, Luanga A. 2009. “Language Socialization: The Naming of Non-Kin Adults by African Children and Preadolescents in Intercultural Encounters.” Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (1): 85–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, Chris. 1975. “Sex-related Differences in Address Systems.” Anthropological Linguistics 17 (5): 198–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1982. “Categories: An Essay in Cognitive Linguistics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 139–193. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maalej, Zouheir. 2010. “Addressing Non-Acquaintances in Tunisian Arabic: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Account.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (1): 147–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marmaridou, Sophia S. A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martiny, T. 1996. “Forms of Address in French and Dutch: A Sociopragmatic Approach.” Language Sciences 18 (3–4): 365–375.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masliyah, Sadok. 1998. “Abu and umm in the Iraqi Dialect.” Journal of Semitic Studies 43 (1): 113–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers Scotton, Carol, and Zhu Wanjin. 1983. “Tóngzhì in China: Language Change and its Conversational Consequences.” Language in Society 12 (4): 477–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. “The Multiple Meanings of shī.fu, a Language Change in Progress.” Anthropological Linguistics 26 (3): 326–344.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pajusalu, Renate, Virve-Anneli Vihman, Birute Klaas, and Karl Pajusalu. 2010. “Forms of Address across Languages: Formal and Informal Second Person Pronoun Usage among Estonia’s Linguistic Communities.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (1): 75–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, Dilworth B. 1985. Constructing the Social Context of Communication: Terms of Address in Egyptian Arabic. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peipei, Ren. 2007. “Sociolinguistic Study on the Term of Address ‘meinü’ in Present-Day China.” Canadian Social Science 3 (6): 101–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Terrence M. 1995. “Moroccan Terms of Address in the Film Dmu’al-Nadem (Tears of Regret).” The Georgetown Journal of Languages and Linguistics 3 (2–4): 218–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch, and Barbara B. Lloyd, 27–48. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1994. Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salami, L. Oladipo. 2004. “Deference and Subordination: Gender Roles and other Variables in Addressing and Referring to Husbands by Yoruba Women.” Linguistik online 211: 65–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1963. “Some Aspects of the Use of Pronouns of Address in Yiddish.” Word 19 (2): 193–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny A. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1983. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1986. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, Andrew D. 2005. “The Reappropriation of Tongzhi.” Language in Society 34 (5): 763–793. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yassin, M. Aziz F. 1977. “Kinship Terms in Kuwaiti Arabic.” Anthropological Linguistics 19 (3): 126–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, Kyung-Joo. 2004. “Not just Words: Korean Social Models and the Use of Honorifics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (2): 189–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhucheng, Ju. 1991. “The ‘Depreciation’ and ‘Appreciation’ of some Term of Address in China.” Language in Society 20 (3): 387–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Essam, Bacem, Jim Bowden & Esra Abdelzaher
2025. Universality of Filionymic and Patronymic Constructions. Corpus Pragmatics 9:3 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Albury-Garcés, Nathan John
2024. Choosing between Cyrillic and Latin for linguistic citizenship in contemporary Serbia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2024:286 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue