Article published In: Pedagogical Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Developing genre awareness in novice academic writers in secondary education
A longitudinal intervention study on students’ academic writing development
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Graz.
Published online: 12 June 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.24017.akb
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.24017.akb
Abstract
Genre-based approaches are widely used in the pedagogy of academic writing. Although they are seen as particularly
suitable for novice academic writers, there is ongoing debate about how explicitly genres should be taught. Some genre pedagogues
argue that the conventional method of teaching genres — referred to as explicit genre teaching — may be overly formulaic and
prescriptive. Consequently, they advocate for fostering genre awareness in novice academic writers. However, there is no solid
empirical evidence to support these discussions, particularly from a developmental perspective. To address this research gap, we
are conducting a longitudinal intervention study in upper secondary education to compare the effectiveness of the aforementioned
genre-based approaches (explicit genre teaching vs. genre awareness approach) in the context of academic writing. In this paper,
we focus on clarifying the concept of genre awareness. We begin with a brief introduction to genre pedagogy and demonstrate how
the concept of genre awareness emerged as a critique of established approaches to genre pedagogy. Building on this, we present the
first part of our genre-based treatments to illustrate how we operationalised the genre awareness approach in contrast to explicit
genre teaching.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The emergence of the concept of genre awareness in genre pedagogy
- Analysing the context
- Comparing different genres
- Destabilizing genre schemas
- 3.Facets of Metalinguistic Awareness in the Genre Awareness Approach
- 4.Explicit Genre Teaching vs. Genre Awareness Approach — comparing two genre-based treatments longitudinally
- 4.1Analysing a research paper introduction using move-analysis
- 4.2Developing control of the genre
- 4.3Collaborative writing of a research paper introduction
- 4.4Schema revision: Comparing a research paper introduction to a handbook introduction and a preface
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (49)
Akbulut, M., & Schmölzer-Eibinger, S. (2023). Sprachbewusstheit
und Schreiben. In A. Wildemann, & L. Bien-Miller (Eds.), Sprachbewusstheit:
Perspektiven aus Forschung und
Didaktik (p. 141–179). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien.
Akbulut, M., Schmölzer-Eibinger, S., & Ebner, C. (2020). Zum
Begriff der Sprachbewusstheit in der Schreibforschung und -didaktik: Ein Beitrag zu seiner theoretischen und empirischen
Fundierung. Zeitschrift für angewandte
Linguistik, 11, 1–32.
Albino, G. (2015). The
effect of an explicit genre-based approach to teaching workplace writing (Doctoral
dissertation). Open University, United Kingdom.
Bäuerlein, K., Lenhard, W., & Schneider, W. (2012). LESEN
8–9: Verfahren zur Erfassung der basalen Lesekompetenz und des Textverständnisses. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre:
An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press LLC.
Baynham, M. (1995). Literacy
Practices: Investigating Literacy in Social Contexts. London, England, & New York, NY: Longman.
Brockmeier, J. (1998). Literales
Bewusstsein: Schriftlichkeit und das Verhältnis von Sprache und Kultur. München, Germany: Fink.
Bushati, B., Ebner, C., Niederdorfer, L., & Schmölzer-Eibinger, S. (2018). Wissenschaftlich
schreiben lernen in der Schule. Baltmannsweiler, Germany: Schneider.
Cheng, A. (2007). Transferring
generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: Understanding writing performance in the ESP genre-based literacy
framework. English for Specific
Purposes, 26(3), 287–307.
Clark, I. L., & Hernandez, A. (2011). Genre
awareness, academic argument, and transferability. The WAC
Journal, 221, 65–78.
Coe, R. M., Lingard, L., & Teslenko, T. (Eds.). (2002). The
rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (1993). Powers
of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. London, England: Falmer Press.
Deng, Y., Lei, J., Jin, T., & Chen, J. (2024). Developing
genre awareness in collaborative academic reading: A case study of novice academic
learners. English for Specific
Purposes, 741, 9–22.
Downs, D., & Wardle, E. (2007). Teaching
about writing, righting misconceptions: (Re)envisioning “first-year composition” as “Introduction to Writing
Studies”. College Composition and
Communication, 58(4), 552–584.
Eisenchlas, S. A. (2011). On-line
interactions as a resource to raise pragmatic awareness. Journal of
Pragmatics, 43(1), 51–61.
Feilke, H., & Lehnen, K. (2011). Wissenschaftlich
Referieren: Positionen wiedergeben und konstruieren. Der
Deutschunterricht, 51, 34–44.
Feilke, H., Köster, J., & Steinmetz, M. (2014). Zur
Einführung — Textkompetenzen in der Sekundarstufe. In H. Feilke, J. Köster, & M. Steinmetz (Eds.), Textkompetenzen
in der Sekundarstufe
II (p. 7–18). Stuttgart, Germany: Fillibach bei Klett.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language
as social semiotics: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based
L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of
change. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 401, 44–59.
Hanson, J. K. (2009). Knowing
more than they can tell: An assessment of genre awareness among students in writing intensive zoology and civil engineering
courses (Doctoral dissertation). University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic
attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied
Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367.
Hyon, S. (2001). Long-term
effects of genre-based instruction: A follow-up study of an EAP reading course. English for
Specific
Purposes, 20(1), 417–438.
Johns, A. M. (2002). Destabilizing
and enriching novice students’ genre theories. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre
in the classroom: Multiple
perspectives (p. 237–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2008). Genre
awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language
Teaching, 41(2), 237–252.
Lee, K. (2006). The
effect of genre-based instruction: Improving English writing ability in the classroom. English
Teaching, 61(1), 257–281.
Luke, A. (1996). Genres
of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & A. G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy
in
society (p. 308–338). London, England: Longman.
Paltridge, B. (1997). Genre,
frames and writing in research settings. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Prior, P. (1995). Redefining
the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate
seminars. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic
writing in a second
language (p. 47–82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Rose, D. (2008). Writing
as linguistic mastery: The development of genre-based literacy
pedagogy. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook
of writing
development (p. 151–166). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2012). Genre
in the Sydney School. In J. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Discourse
Analysis (p. 209–225). New York, NY: Routledge.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. N. (2012). Learning
to write/reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. Toronto, Kanada: University of Toronto Press.
Russell, D. R., Lea, M., Parker, J., Street, B., & Donahue, T. (2009). Exploring
notions of genre in “academic literacies” and “writing across the curriculum”: Approaches across countries and
contexts. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Genre
in a changing
world (S. 395–423). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Schicker, S. (2020). Förderung
der Textbeurteilungskompetenz von Lernenden: Eine Interventionsstudie in sprachlich heterogenen
Klassen. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Segev-Miller, R. (2007). Cognitive
processes in discourse synthesis: The case of intertextual processing
strategies. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Ed.), Writing
and
cognition (p. 231–250). Leiden, Niederlande: Brill.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre
analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J., & Feak, C. (1994). Academic
writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Tardy, C. M., Buck, R. H., Jacobson, B., LaMance, R., Pawlowski, M., Slinkard, J. R., & Vogel, S. M. (2022). “It’s
complicated and nuanced”: Teaching genre awareness in English for general academic
purposes. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 571, 101–117.
Thaiss, C. (2012). Origins,
aims, and uses of writing programs worldwide: Profiles of academic writing in many
places. In C. Thaiss, G. Bräuer, P. Carolino, L. Ganobcsik-Williams & A. Sinha (Eds.), Writing
programs worldwide: Profiles of academic writing in many
places (p. 5–22). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Uebel, E. M. (2023). Sprachbewusstheit
auf Textebene. In A. Wildemann, & L. Bien-Miller (Eds.), Sprachbewusstheit:
Perspektiven aus Forschung und
Didaktik (p. 181–223). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien.
Weidacher, G. (2007). Multimodale
Textkompetenz. In S. Schmölzer-Eibinger (Ed.), Textkompetenz:
Eine Schlüsselkompetenz und ihre
Vermittlung (p. 39–57). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.