Article published In: Pedagogical Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Swedish medical students’ writing self-efficacy and writing beliefs regarding undergraduate thesis writing
A cross-sectional study using validated instruments
Monika Fagevik Olsén | University of GothenburgGothenburg | Sahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburg
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Gothenburg.
Published online: 11 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.24016.han
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.24016.han
Abstract
Medical students in Sweden often write their first thesis in English as a foreign language without prior training
in academic writing. This study examines their writing beliefs and self-efficacy, and how these may change during the writing
process. Writing self-efficacy refers to a person’s belief in their ability to perform specific writing skills and tasks, such as
writing a thesis. Forty-two Swedish medical students (42/300, 14%) completed validated questionnaires examining their writing
self-efficacy and beliefs regarding the writing process: The Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES) and The
Writing Process Questionnaire. Despite the medical students’ limited prior writing experience, they had a high writing
self-efficacy, suggesting overconfidence. There was a slight tendency for the self-efficacy to decrease during the actual writing
of the thesis. The students had the highest self-efficacy concerning more mechanical aspects of writing, such as using academic
vocabulary and synthesising information, and the lowest self-efficacy concerning organising ideas and writing for an audience.
Their beliefs could reflect immature writing development. The study’s results highlight the need for improved thesis preparation
and clearer writing curriculum goals for medical students.
Article outline
- 1.Background
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Context
- 2.2Ethics
- 2.3Participants
- 2.4Measurement of writing self-efficacy and writing beliefs
- 2.5Statistics
- 3.Results
- 3.1Thesis language, previous experience, and goals with the thesis
- 3.2Writing self-efficacy measured with SAWSES
- 3.3Writing beliefs measured with the Writing Process Questionnaire
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Methodological considerations
- 4.2Considerations regarding the results
- 4.3Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Note
- Ethics approval and consent to participate
- Consent for publication
- Availability of data and materials
- Authors’ contributions
- List of abbreviations
References
References (29)
Artino, Anthony R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: from
educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on medical
education, 1(2), 76–85.
Bandura, Albert. (1978). Self-efficacy:
Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and
Therapy, 1(4), 139–161.
Cumming, A., & Ross, M. (2007). The
Tuning Project for Medicine--learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education in
Europe. Med
Teach, 29(7), 636–641.
Di Bitetti, M. S., & Ferreras, J. A. (2017). Publish
(in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific
publications. Ambio, 46(1), 121–127.
Ekholm, Eric, Zumbrunn, Sharon, & Conklin, Sarah. (2015). The
relation of college student self-efficacy toward writing and writing self-regulation aptitude: writing feedback perceptions as
a mediating variable. Teaching in higher
education, 20(2), 197–207.
Fosnacht, Kevin, Sarraf, Shimon, Howe, Elijah, & Peck, Leah K. (2017). How Important are High
Response Rates for College Surveys? Review of higher
education, 40(2), 245–265.
Frank, J. R., Snell, L. S., Cate, O. T., Holmboe, E. S., Carraccio, C., Swing, S. R., … Harris, K. A. (2010). Competency-based
medical education: theory to practice. Med
Teach, 32(8), 638–645.
Gothenburg
University (2023). Overall instructions for writing a
thesis. University of Gothenburg. [URL]
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training
writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of writing
research, 1(1), 1–26.
Kellogg, Ronald T., & Raulerson, R. D. Bascom A. (2007). Improving the
writing skills of college students. Psychonomic bulletin &
review, 14(2), 237–242.
Kellogg, Ronald T., & Whiteford, Alison P. (2009). Training Advanced
Writing Skills: The Case for Deliberate Practice. Educational
psychologist, 44(4), 250–266.
Kim-Rivera, E. G. (1999). English
Language Education in the Swedish Compulsory School. Foreign language
annals, 32(2), 234–242.
Kobayashi, Hiroe, & Rinnert, Carol. (2013). L1/L2/L3
writing development: Longitudinal case study of a Japanese multicompetent writer. Journal of
second language
writing, 22(1), 4–33.
Lonka, Kirsti, Chow, Angela, Keskinen, Jenni, Hakkarainen, Kai, Sandström, Niclas, & Pyhältö, Kirsi. (2014). How
to measure PhD Students’ conceptions of academic writing — and are they related to
well-being? Journal of writing
research, 5(3), 245–269.
Mitchell, Kim M. (2018). Constructing Writing Practices
in Nursing. The Journal of Nursing
Education, 57(7), 399–407.
Mitchell, Kim M., McMillan, Diana E., Lobchuk, Michelle M., Nickel, Nathan C., Rabbani, Rasheda, & Li, Johnson. (2021). Development
and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES). Assessing
writing, 481, 100524.
Motulsky, Harvey. (2014). Intuitive
biostatistics: a nonmathematical guide to statistical thinking (3rd
ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Möller, R., & Shoshan, M. (2019). Does
reality meet expectations? An analysis of medical students’ expectations and perceived learning during mandatory research
projects. BMC Med
Educ, 19(1), 93.
Möller, R., Wallberg, A., & Shoshan, M. (2021). Faculty
perceptions of factors that indicate successful educational outcomes of medical students’ research projects: a focus group
study. BMC Med
Educ, 21(1), 519.
Nulty, Duncan D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates
to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment and evaluation in higher
education, 33(3), 301–314.
Pajares, Frank. (2003). Self-efficacy
Beliefs, Motivation, and Achievement in Writing: A Review of the Literature. Reading
&Writing
Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158.
Pajares, Frank, Hartley, James, & Valiante, Giovanni. (2001). Response
Format in Writing Self-Efficacy Assessment: Greater Discrimination Increases
Prediction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and
Development, 33(4), 214–221.
Palmquist, Michael, & Young, Richard. (1992). The
Notion of Giftedness and Student Expectations about Writing. Written
communication, 9(1), 137–168.
Pye, E. (2018). Writing
in Medical Education: A Student Perspective. [Master’s
thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland]. St. John’s. Newfoundland and Labrador. [URL]
Sanders-Reio, Joanne. (2010). Investigation
of the relations between domain -specific beliefs about writing, writing self-efficacy, writing apprehension, and writing
performance in undergraduates. (PhD Thesis), University of Maryland, Maryland: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved from [URL]
Swedish Council for Higher Education. Antagningsstatistik
Läkarprogrammet (2021). [URL]
Swedish Law SFS 1993:100. The Higher Education
Ordinance. Högskoleförordningen, Appendix 2:4. [URL]
Swedish Law SFS 2003:460. The Ethical Review Act. Lagen om etikprövning av forskning som avser
människor, (2003). [URL]