Cover not available

Article published In: Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (2022) ► pp.109–142

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy

From rationale to applications

ORCiD logo with link | Université catholique de Louvain
Published online: 1 July 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.22014.gil
Abstract
This article deals with applied cognitive corpus linguistics, that is, the combined use of cognitive linguistics and corpus linguistics for pedagogical purposes. It describes the main features of each framework in terms of teaching applications and underlines their complementarity. Through several illustrations, it shows how applied cognitive corpus linguistics combines the benefits of corpus data (authenticity, quantification, diversification of genres, access to learner production, etc.) with those of cognitive principles (linguistic motivation, enhanced salience, realignment of form and meaning, etc.) in ways that are expected to foster the development of the learner’s language system.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cognitive linguistics and pedagogy
  • 3.Corpus linguistics and pedagogy
  • 4.Applied cognitive corpus linguistics
    • 4.1Using corpora in cognitively inspired pedagogy
      • 4.1.1The empirical turn in cognitive linguistics
      • 4.1.2Advantages of corpora for applied cognitive linguistics
      • 4.1.3Limitations
    • 4.2Using cognitive principles in corpus-based pedagogy
      • 4.2.1The theoretical contribution to corpus linguistics
      • 4.2.2Advantages of cognitive principles for applied corpus linguistics
      • 4.2.3Limitations
    • 4.3Complementarity between corpus linguistics and cognitive linguistics
    • 4.4Illustrations
      • 4.4.1Corpus-informed or cognition-informed approach
      • 4.4.2Corpus-driven approach
      • 4.4.3Cognition-driven approach
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (110)
References
Aijmer, K. (Ed.). (2009). Corpora and language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnett, C., & Suñer, F. (2019). Leveraging cognitive linguistic approaches to grammar teaching with multimedia animations. Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(3), 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A. (2010). Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, M. (2011). Corpus linguistics and theoretical linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(1), 3–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BNC Consortium (2007). The British National Corpus, XML edition. Oxford: Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. (Ed.). (2022). Directions for pedagogical construction grammar: Learning and teaching (with) constructions. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C., Dux, R., & Ziem, A. (2016). Frames and constructions in an online learner’s dictionary of German. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp. 303–326). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., He, L., Deconinck, J., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). Typographic enhancement of multiword units in second language text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 448–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2006). Means of motivating multiword units: Rationale, mnemonic benefits and cognitive-style variables. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Medved Krajnovic, & J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 6 (pp. 169–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2005). Finding ways to make phrase-learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration. System, 33(2), 225–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals, and evaluation. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 305–355). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2008a). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). How cognitive linguistics can foster effective vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers, & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 1–61). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulton, A. (2009). Data-driven learning: Reasonable fears and rational reassurance. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 81–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Consultation de corpus et styles d’apprentissage. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité – Cahiers de l’Apliut, 29(1), 98–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campoy, M. C., Bellés-Fortuño, B., & Gea-Valor, M. L. (2010). Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, A. (2019). Towards the corpus revolution? Bridging the research–practice gap. Language Teaching, 52(4), 460–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, W. (2010). What can a corpus tell us about language teaching? In A. O’Keeffe, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 319–332). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, L., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2009). Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 336–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csábi, S. (2008). A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching. In M. Achard, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 233–256). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available at [URL]
De Knop, S., Boers, F., & De Rycker, T. (Eds.). (2010). Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Knop, S., & De Rycker, T. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Knop, S., & Gilquin, G. (Eds.). (2016). Applied construction grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Knop, S., & Meunier, F. (Eds.). (2015a). Learner corpus research, cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Special issue of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). The ‘learner corpus research, cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition’ nexus: A SWOT analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolgova, N., & Tyler, A. (2019). Applications of usage-based approaches to language teaching. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 939–961). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2012). What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use? In S. Th. Gries, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Frequency effects in language learning and processing (pp. 7–33). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Construction grammar and second language acquisition. In Th. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 365–378). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C. (2005). Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells? TESL-EJ, 8(4), 1–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2006). A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 1–28). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2006). The verb slot in causative constructions. Finding the best fit. Constructions SV1-3/2006. Available from [URL]
(2008). Taking a new look at lexical networks. Lexis, 11: 23–39. Available from [URL].
(2021). Using corpora to foster L2 construction learning: A data-driven learning experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 229–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Constructing learner speech: On the use of spoken data in applied construction grammar. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Directions for pedagogical construction grammar: Learning and teaching (with) constructions (pp. 73–96). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2011). From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In J. Mukherjee, & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp. 55–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Using data-driven learning in language teaching. In A. O’Keeffe, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. Second edition (pp. 430–442). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., & Paquot, M. (2008). Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction, 1(1), 41–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Godfrey, J. J., Holliman, E. C., & McDaniel, J. (1992). Switchboard: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In Proceedings of ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Volume 1 (pp. 517–520). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Making one’s way through the data. In M. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 29–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Götz, S., & Mukherjee, J. (Eds.). (2019). Learner corpora and language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. (1993). The International Corpus of Learner English. In J. Aarts, P. de Haan, & N. Oostdijk (Eds.), English language corpora: Design, analysis and exploitation (pp. 57–69). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg, & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in contrast: Papers from a symposium on text-based cross-linguistic studies (pp. 37–51). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 13–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dupont, M., Meunier, F., Naets, H., & Paquot, M. (2020). The International Corpus of Learner English. Version 3. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., Hung, J., & Petch-Tyson, S. (Eds.). (2000). Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2008). Gestures and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 276–305). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbst, Th., & Hoffmann, Th. (2018). Construction Grammar for students: A Constructionist Approach to Syntactic Analysis (CASA). Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 6(1), 197–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Th. (2021). Multimodal Construction Grammar: From multimodal constructs to multimodal constructions. In X. Wen, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 78–92). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, M., Sand, A., & Skandera, P. (1999). Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English (FROWN). Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2010). Corpus-assisted creative writing: Introducing intermediate Italian learners to a corpus as a reference resource. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 28–44. Available from [URL]
Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapaire, J.-R. (2006). La grammaire anglaise en mouvement. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laviosa, S. (2002). Corpus-based translation studies: Theory, findings, applications. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1997). Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery, & G. Knowles (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora (pp. 1–23). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Frequency, corpora and language learning. In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora. In Honour of Sylviane Granger (pp. 7–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Dziwirek, K. (Eds.). (2009). Studies in cognitive corpus linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008). Teaching chunks of language: From noticing to remembering. Helbling Languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loenheim, L., Lyngfelt, B., Olofsson, J., Prentice, J., & Tingsell, S. (2016). Constructicography meets (second) language education: On constructions in teaching aids and the usefulness of a Swedish constructicon. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp. 327–355). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H. (2004–2006). Touchstone (four levels). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (1997). Teaching and language corpora (TALC). ReCALL, 9(1), 5–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meunier, F. (2002). The pedagogical value of native and learner corpora in EFL grammar teaching. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 119–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Corpora, cognition and pedagogical grammars: An account of convergences and divergences. In S. De Knop, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 91–117). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, K., & Fischer, K. (2015). On the interaction of constructions with register and genre. Constructions and Frames, 7(2), 137–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norvig, P., & Lakoff, G. (1987). Taking: A study in lexical network theory. In J. Aske, N. Beery, L. A. Michaelis, & H. Filip (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 14–16, 1987. General session and parasession on grammar and cognition (pp. 195–206). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, Í. (2007). Enhancing a process-oriented approach to literacy and language learning: The role of corpus consultation literacy. ReCALL, 19(3), 269–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pütz, M., Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R. (2001). Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandra, D., & Rice, S. (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind – the linguist’s or the language user’s? Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 89–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schönefeld, D. (1999). Corpus linguistics and cognitivism. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 4(1), 137–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2002). Pedagogy and local learner corpora: Working with learning-driven data. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH. (Ed.). (2004). How to use corpora in language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (2004). Language corpora. In A. Davies, & C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 106–132). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2017). Variationist sociolinguistics and corpus-based variationist linguistics: Overlap and cross-pollination potential. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 62(4), 685–701. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2008). What is corpus linguistics? What the data says. ICAME Journal, 321, 179–200.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2006). Cognitive semantics. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, volume 2. Second edition (pp. 569–582). Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teubert, W. (2008). Some notes on the concept of cognitive linguistics. In A. Gerbig, & O. Mason (Eds.), Language, people, numbers (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2006). System and corpus: Two traditions with a common ground. In G. Thompson, & S. Hunston (Eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections (pp. 1–14). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiedemann, J. (2012). Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2012) (pp. 2214–2218). European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2011). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (pp. 95–160). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Huang, L. (2018). Introduction. In A. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research (pp. 1–33). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L. (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, A., Fligelstone, S., McEnery, T., & Knowles, G. (Eds.). (1997). Teaching and language corpora. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, M. H. I., Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). A cognitive linguistics application for second language pedagogy: The English Preposition Tutor. Language Learning, 68(2), 438–468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S. (2021). Krashen’s claims through a usage-based lens. Foreign Language Annals, 54(2), 306–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, J., & Gries, S. Th. (2016). Corpus-based approaches to construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Reyes Suárez, Ana María & Mona Arhire
2025. Corpus-Based Approaches to Cuban Higher Education English Language Teaching and Teacher Training: Needs Assessment. Journal of Latinos and Education 24:5 ► pp. 1301 ff. DOI logo
Romain, Laurence & Dagmar Divjak
2025. The types of cues that help you learn. Pedagogical Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Romero Muñoz, Eloy & Remy Decorte
2025. Exploring methodological issues in Applied Cognitive Linguistics teaching materials. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 12:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Sökefeld, Carla & Anastasiia Stulen
2025. Corpus-based teaching materials for incorporating corpus literacy into German as a foreign language classes. Kalbotyra 78 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Söğüt, Sibel
2024. L2 Learners’ Perspectives on Data-Driven Learning for Identifying Properties of Near-Synonymous Words: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal 27 DOI logo
Ávila-Muñoz, Antonio Manuel
2024. Spanish Students’ Categorical Perceptions of Feminist Movements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 53:4 DOI logo
Littlemore, Jeannette
2023. ‘Oscar sent Venice an elephant’: Construction Grammars and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Stringer, David
2022. Knowledge beyond usage. Pedagogical Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue