Cover not available

Commentary published In: Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (2022) ► pp.166–173

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required
Commentary

Knowledge beyond usage

Potential and limitations of cognitive corpus linguistics for pedagogy

ORCiD logo with link | Indiana University
Published online: 13 July 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.22008.str
References (36)
References
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2015). Designing instructional effect studies for L2 pragmatics: A guide for teachers and researchers. In S. Gesuato, F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds.) Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices (pp. 135–164). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Su, Y. (2017). The effect of corpus-based instruction on pragmatic routines. Language Learning & Technology 21(3): 76–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Stringer, D. (2017). Unconventional expressions: Productive syntax in the L2 acquisition of formulaic language. Second Language Research, 33(1): 61–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2006). Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals, and evaluation. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 305–355). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, S. E. (2010). Explaining how learners extract ‘formulae’ from L2 input. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11: 229–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E. (2005). Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 45–68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Knop, S. & Meunier, F. (2015). The ‘learner corpus research, cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition’ nexus: A SWOT analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C. (2005). Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells? TESLEJ, 8(4), 1–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2021). Using corpora to foster L2 construction learning: A data-driven learning experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 229–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gradman, H. (1971). The limitations of contrastive analysis predictions. Proceedings of the Pacific Conference on Contrastive Linguistics and Language Universals (PCCLLU): University of Hawai’i Working Papers in Linguistics 3/41: 11–16. University of Hawai’i.radman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2021). A psycholinguistically motivated methodology for task-based language teaching. In M. Ahmadian & M. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp. 305–325). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D. (1981). Introduction. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 9–31). New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (2013, 4th ed.). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. & Boers, F. (2008). Teaching chunks of language: From noticing to remembering. Innsbruck: Helbling Languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. (2015). Experimental perspectives on classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 60–73). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nash, H., & Snowling, M. (2006). Teaching new words to children with poor existing vocabulary knowledge: A controlled evaluation of the definition and context methods. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(3), 335–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 501, 417–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 691, 652–708. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning 24(2): 205–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. (2013). Generative approaches and the poverty of the stimulus. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 137–158). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seuss, Dr. (1957). The cat in the hat. New York: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R. (2013). Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63(2), 296–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the second language. New York/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stahl, S. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings (and what to do to make vocabulary an integral part of instruction). In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 95–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stringer, D. (2019). Lexical semantics: Relativity and transfer. In Erdogan, N. & Wei, M. (Eds.), Applied linguistics for teachers of culturally and linguistically diverse learners (pp. 180–203). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks. Language Learning 61(2): 569–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A., Huang, L., & Jan, H. (2018) (Eds.). What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S. (Eds.). (2020). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue