Article published In: Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2020) ► pp.34–43
Linguistics, language teaching objectives and the language learning process
Published online: 17 February 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19014.wid
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19014.wid
Abstract
Linguistics has always been taken as the authoritative frame of reference for how language is represented as a pedagogic subject, and as approaches to linguistic description have changed so accordingly have approaches to language teaching. But the purposes that determine what aspects of language are to be abstracted as relevant for linguistic description do not correspond with those of language pedagogy. What linguistics provides are ways of specifying what is to be taught as the eventual learning objective in relative disregard of the learning process, a process that it is the essential purpose of pedagogy to promote. An alternative to this customary objective driven approach, would be to focus not on acquiring competence in a particular and separate L2 but on extending the general capability for using language as a communicative resource that learners have already acquired in their L1. Such an approach effectively makes the primary objective of pedagogy the development of the learning process itself.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Linguistic description and pedagogic design
- 3.The objective and process of language learning
- 4.The learning process as objective: An alternative approach
References
References (16)
Chomsky, N. (1966/71). Linguistic theory. In R. G. Mead (Ed.), Language teaching: Broader contexts. Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Modern Languages: Reports of the working committees. New York: MLA Materials Center. Reprinted 1971 in J. P. B. Allen & P. van Buren (Eds.), Chomsky: Selected readings. (pp. 152–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garcia, O., & Li Wei. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. London. Palgrave Macmillan.
Garrett, P., & Cots, J. (Eds.). (2017). Routledge handbook of language awareness. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (Eds.). (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) in second language acquisition research [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics, 30(4).
Howatt, A., with Widdowson, H. (2004). A history of English language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, Vol. 231. Reprinted in Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Shared knowledge In J. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp. 11–24). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
(1997). Corpus evidence in language description. In A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora. (pp. 27–39). London: Longman.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Carcamo, Benjamin, Bernardo Pino & Christopher P. Johnson
Link, Sabrina
Ponce-Ramírez, Fernando Israel, Cesar Delgado Valles, Jessica Rascón Castillo & Michelle Anahí Canales Acosta
Yelubayeva, Perizat, Azima Khamidova, Gulzat Berkinbayeva & Raushangul Avakova
Keyser, Beth R
Keyser, Beth R.
White, Lydia
Boldireff, Anastasia & Chris Bober
2022. Reconsidering poetry’s difficulty and value in English as a second language and English as a foreign language
education. Pedagogical Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.