Nanon Labrie
List of John Benjamins publications in which Nanon Labrie is involved.
Journal
ISSN 2211-4742 | E‑ISSN 2211‑4750
Book series
Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research
Edited by Nanon Labrie and Ninke Stukker
ISSN 1566-7774
Titles
Argumentative Style: A pragma-dialectical study of functional variety in argumentative discourse
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Sara Greco, Ton van Haaften, Nanon Labrie, Fernando Leal and Peng Wu
Argumentative Style discusses the various ways in which the defence of a standpoint is given shape in argumentative discourse. In this innovative study the new notion – ‘argumentative style’ – introduced for this purpose is situated in the theoretical framework of the pragma-dialectical approach to… read more[Argumentation in Context, 20] 2022. x, 332 pp.
Argumentation between Doctors and Patients: Understanding clinical argumentative discourse
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie
Argumentation between Doctors and Patients discusses the use of argumentation in clinical settings. Starting from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, it aims at providing an understanding of argumentative discourse in the context of doctor-patient interaction. It explains when and how… read more[Not in series, 235] 2021. x, 155 pp.
Argumentation and Patient Centered Care
Edited by Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie
Special issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 (2018) vi, 132 pp.
2020 A Dutch dose of dissent: Exploring the role of gender, education, and culture on Dutch students’ argumentative predispositions Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2, pp. 219–242 | Article
The Dutch are often thought of as direct, verbally aggressive, and argumentative. Yet, evidence for this stereotype is lacking. This study explores argumentative predispositions in the Netherlands. In a survey, Dutch students’ (N = 133) argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, argument frames,… read more
2019 Chapter 13. Characteristics of argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer: An observational content analysis Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 237–266 | Chapter
2019 “Doctor, I disagree”: Development and preliminary validation of a patient argumentativeness scale Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3, pp. 336–353 | Article
In medical consultations, disagreements may arise. Yet, patients’ predisposition to engage in a discussion with their doctors to resolve these disagreements may vary. This study aims to develop and validate a measurement tool to assess patient argumentativeness (P-ARG) in general practice.… read more
2018 The stereotypicality of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer Argumentation and Patient Centered Care, Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie (eds.), pp. 181–203 | Article
A recent line of argumentation research has focused on the examination of prototypical argumentative patterns – patterns that can be theoretically expected in view of the type of standpoint defended, the institutional aim, and the conventions and constraints of the context (Van Eemeren… read more
2018 Argumentation and patient centered care Argumentation and Patient Centered Care, Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie (eds.), pp. 117–119 | Introduction
2013 Strategically eliciting concessions from patients in treatment decision-making discussions Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:3, pp. 322–341 | Article
In this paper it is examined how doctors may strategically elicit concessions from their patients in order to create a favorable point of departure for the treatment decision-making discussion. Using the dialectical profile for establishing starting points in an argumentative discussion (van… read more