Environmental Argumentation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
Special issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 (2019) v, 171 pp.
Marcin Lewiński
List of John Benjamins publications in which Marcin Lewiński is involved.
Titles
Argumentation in Political Deliberation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed
The goal of this volume is to further the examination of the role, shape, and quality of argumentation in political deliberation. The chapters collected in the volume employ the concepts and methods developed within argumentation theory to investigate the specifics of political discourse across… read more[Benjamins Current Topics, 76] 2015. v, 178 pp.
Argumentation in political deliberation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed
Special issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:1 (2013) v, 177 pp.
2019 The 2015 Paris Climate Conference: Arguing for the fragile consensus in global multilateral diplomacy Environmental Argumentation, Lewiński, Marcin and Mehmet Ali Üzelgün (eds.), pp. 65–90 | Article
The paper applies argumentative discourse analysis to a corpus of official statements made by key players (USA, EU, China, India, etc.) at the opening of the 2015 Paris Climate Conference. The chief goal is to reveal the underlying structure of practical arguments and values legitimising the… read more
2019 Environmental argumentation Environmental Argumentation, Lewiński, Marcin and Mehmet Ali Üzelgün (eds.), pp. 1–11 | Introduction
2019 Environmental manifestoes: Argumentative strategies in the Ecomodernist Manifesto Environmental Argumentation, Lewiński, Marcin and Mehmet Ali Üzelgün (eds.), pp. 12–39 | Article
In this paper, we analyze the argumentative strategies deployed in the Ecomodernist Manifesto, published in 2015 by a group of leading environmental thinkers. We draw on pragma-dialectics and Perelman’s rhetoric to characterize manifesto as a genre of practical argumentation. Our goal is to… read more
2015 Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and cases Argumentation in Political Deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 151–176 | Article
Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on “two sides of an issue” (pro and con). However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of competing… read more
2013 Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and cases Argumentation in political deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 151–177 | Article
Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on “two sides of an issue” (pro and con). However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of competing… read more
2013 Argumentation in political deliberation Argumentation in political deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 1–9 | Article
2011 Argument analysis in large-scale deliberation Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Feteris, Eveline T., Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), pp. 165–184 | Article