Cover not available

Review published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 9:1 (2001) ► pp.135147

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (27)
References
Armengaud, F. et al. 1984. La ronde des sujets (= DRLAV [“Documentation et Recherche en Linguistique Allemande, Vincennes”] 301). Paris: Centre des recherches de l’Université de Paris VIII.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bally, Ch. 1935 [1913]. Le langage et la vie. Zürich: Max Niehans [1st ed. 1913, Geneva: Atar].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1965 [1932]. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Berne: A. Francke [1st ed. 1932].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bearth, T. 1986. L’articulation du temps et de l’aspect dans le discours.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. “Focus and implicature”. In S. Čmejrová, J. Hoffmannová, O. Müllerová and J. Svĕtlá (eds), Dialogue Analysis VI (= Beiträge zur Dialogforschung 161), vol. 11. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 395–405.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, K. 1982 [1934]. Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart/New York: G. Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caron, B. 1991. Le Haoussa de l’Ader. Berlin: D. Reimer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culioli, A. 1982. “Rôle des représentations métalinguistiques en syntaxe”. Paper read at the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists, Tokyo 1982 (= Collection ERA 642, Université de Paris VII1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988. “Valeurs aspectuelles et opérations énonciatives: l’aoristique”. In David and Martin (eds), 181–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Opérations et représentations, Tome 1. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
David, J. and Martin, R. (eds). 1988. La notion d’aspect. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delplanque, A. 1995. “Que signifient les classes nominales? L’exemple du mooré, langue gur”. Linguistique Africaine 151: 5–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desclés, J. -P. 1980a. “Construction formelle de la catégorie grammaticale de l’aspect”. In David and Martin (eds), 195–237.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1980b. “Mathématisation des concepts linguistiques”. Modèles linguistiques 2(1): 21–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diagana, Y. 1994. Eléments de grammaire du soninke. Paris: Associationde Linguistique Africaine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. and Léonard, A. -M. 1979. Vers une théorie des aspects. Les systèmes du français et de l’anglais. Paris: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. 1984. “Le sujet dans la théorie énonciative d’Antoine Culioli: Quelques repères”. In F. Armengaud et al., 45–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin/ New York: Moutonde Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masiuk, N. 1994. L’emploi des particules, des formes pronominales fortes, et de l’extraposition en bambara — parler de Bamako (= Mandenkan 271).Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohamadou, A. 1991. Classificateurs et représentation des propriétés lexicales en peul: parlers de l’Aadamaawa. Paris: Association de Linguistique Africaine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robert, S. 1991. Approche énonciative du système verbal. Le cas du Wolof. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simonin, J. 1984. “De la nécessité de distinguer énonciateur et locuteur dans une théorie énonciative”. In F. Armengaud et al., 55–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weil, H. 1844. De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Joubert. [Engl. transl.: The Order of Words in the Ancient Languages Compared with that of the Modern Languages, Boston, 1887. Reedited by John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1978.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yelbert, J. E. 1996. Etude des énoncés comportant sè dans la langue akan: invariance et variations. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Université de Paris X-Nanterre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Metta, Sabine & Josiane Caron-Pargue
2011. Dynamic Relations between Naming and Acting in Adult Mental Retardation. In Brain Informatics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6889],  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Bégoin-Augereau, Sandra & Josiane Caron-Pargue
2009. Linguistic markers of decision processes in a problem solving task. Cognitive Systems Research 10:2  pp. 102 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue