Article published In: The Concept of Reference in the Cognitive Sciences
Edited by Amichai Kronfeld and Lawrence D. Roberts
[Pragmatics & Cognition 6:1/2] 1998
► pp. 189–207
Reference and definite referring expressions
Published online: 1 January 1998
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.6.1-2.10eps
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.6.1-2.10eps
Definite referring expressions have been studied almost exclusively with respect to their ability to uniquely identify objects. Based on examples of NPs with the drawn from naturally occurring texts, I argue that definite referring expressions serve other functions, as well — they indicate the prominence of a referent, the referent's status as a role function (rather than an individual) or the viewpoint from which the referent is presented. All of this information contributes to the construction of discourse referents and is therefore part of the speech act of referring. In general, speakers do not talk about objects in a neutral fashion, but rather attempt to induce addressees to accept them into the discourse under different guises. Thus, the notion of a successful reference cannot be restricted to cases in which an object is uniquely identified.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Rudd, Philip W.
2022. Weapons of mass destruction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 499 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
