Cover not available

Article In: Investigating Children’s Irony Comprehension: Current trends, challenges, and perspectives
Edited by Julia Fuchs-Kreiß
[Pragmatics & Cognition 33:1] 2026
► pp. 121–139

Conventionality in irony development

Help or hinder?

ORCiD logo with link | University College London
ORCiD logo with link | University College London
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Unlike other figurative language abilities, irony emerges rather late, and its mastering takes place over a protracted window of development. Whilst its late emergence reflects the later development of prerequisite skills, its protracted development is likely to reflect the fact that some ironies are easier to grasp than others. In this paper, we discuss how conventionality is one factor which is likely to contribute to how easily ironies are mastered, yet despite this the nature of conventionality in irony and its effects on irony development are mostly unexplored. We argue for the existence of multiple sources of conventionality for irony likely to play a crucial role in its development. Since some of these sources facilitate adult irony processing, we investigate whether conventionality is likely to be a help to achieve proficient irony comprehension or rather a hinderance, as it has been found to be elsewhere in pragmatic development.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Conventionality in figurative meaning
  • 3.Conventionality in irony
    • 3.1Lexicalisation
    • 3.2Strategies
      • 3.2.1Lexical markers
      • 3.2.2Tag questions
      • 3.2.3Hyperbole
    • 3.3Directness/Simplicity
  • 4.Conventionality in language development
  • 5.Conventionality in irony development
    • 5.1Lexicalisation
    • 5.2Strategies
    • 5.3Directness/Simplicity
  • 6.Conventionality and irony development research
  • Author note
  • Acknowledgements
  • CRediT Author statement
  • References
References (63)
References
Aguert, Marc, Virginie Laval, Nadia Gauducheau, Hassan Atifi & Michel Marcoccia. 2016. Producing irony in adolescence: A comparison between face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Psychology of Language and Communication 20(3). 199–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aguert, Marc, Coralie Le Vallois, Karine Martel & Virginie Laval. 2018. “That’s really clever!” Ironic hyperbole understanding in children. Journal of Child Language 45(1). 260–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura. 1998. On the conventionalization of verbal irony in English: A corpus-based study. In Ignacio Vázquez Orta & Ignacio Guillén Galve (eds.), Perspectivas pragmáticas en lingüística aplicada, 11–18. Zaragoza: Anubar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Irony as inferred contradiction. Russian Journal of Linguistics 41. 140–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrés-Roqueta, Clara & Napoleon Katsos. 2020. A distinction between linguistic and social pragmatics helps the precise characterization of pragmatic challenges in children with autism spectrum disorders and developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63(5). 1494–1508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angeleri, Romina & Gabriella Airenti. 2014. The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3- to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 68(2). 133–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2013. Intentionality and irony. In Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo & M. Belén Alvarado Ortega (eds.), Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse, 39–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banasik, Natalia. 2013. Non-literal speech comprehension in preschool children: An example from a study on verbal irony. Psychology of Language and Communication 17(3). 309–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia & Barbara Bokus. 2019. Children’s comprehension of irony: Studies on Polish-speaking preschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48(5). 1217–1240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia, Sandra Bosacki, Anna Mitrowska, Diana Wyrębek Walters, Katarzyna Wisiecka, Natalia Ewelina Copeland, Lara Wieland, Ljiljana Popovic, Jovana Piper & Aleksandra Siemieniuk. 2020. “Wonderful! We’ve just missed the bus”: Parental use of irony and children’s irony comprehension. PLOS ONE 15(2). e0228538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasko, Dawn G. & Deborah S. Briihl. 1997. Reading and recall of metaphorical sentences: Effects of familiarity and context. Metaphor and Symbol 12(4). 261–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosco, Francesca M. & Monica Bucciarelli. 2008. Simple and complex deceits and ironies. Journal of Pragmatics 40(4). 583–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowdle, Brian F. & Dedre Gentner. 2005. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review 112(1). 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken & Peter Jan Schellens. 2012. Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics 44(3). 231–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, Christian, Kiki Y. Renardel de Lavalette & Gerard J. Steen. 2018. Metaphor, hyperbole, and irony: Uses in isolation and in combination in written discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 1271. 71–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnett, Debra L. 2015. Exploring the role of conventionality in children’s interpretation of ironic remarks. Journal of Child Language 42(6). 1267–1288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capelli, Carol A., Noreen Nakagawa & Cary M. Madden. 1990. How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development 61(6). 1824–1841. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1993. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1). 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csibra, Gergely & György Gergely. 2009. Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(4). 148–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366(1567). 1149–1157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deliens, Gaétane, Kyriakos Antoniou, Elise Clin, Ekaterina Ostashchenko & Mikhail Kissine. 2018. Context, facial expression and prosody in irony processing. Journal of Memory and Language 991. 35–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demorest, Amy, Lisa Silberstein, Howard Gardner & Ellen Winner. 1983. Telling it as it isn’t: Children’s understanding of figurative language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1(2). 121–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Ellen Winner, Joan Kaplan, Elizabeth Rosenblatt, Malia Hunt, Karen Lim, Angela McGovern, Alison Qualter & Bonnie Smarsh. 1996. Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development 67(6). 3071–3085. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falkum, Ingrid L., Marta Recasens & Eve V. Clark. 2017. “The moustache sits down first”: On the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language 44(1). 87–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falkum, Ingrid Lossius. 2022. The development of non-literal uses of language: Sense conventions and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics 1881. 97–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filik, Ruth, Hartmut Leuthold, Katie Wallington & Jemma Page. 2014. Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 40(3). 811–828. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filippova, Eva. 2014. Irony production and comprehension. In Danielle Matthews (ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition, 261–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filippova, Eva & Janet Wilde Astington. 2008. Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development 79(1). 126–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Sarah, Meredith L. Rowe, Sandra Bosacki & Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak. 2024. “Mom said it in quotation marks!” Irony comprehension and metapragmatic awareness in 8-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 51(3). 485–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 8(3). 183–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenwright, Melanie, Brent Tapley, Jacqueline K. S. Rano & Penny M. Pexman. 2017. Developing appreciation for sarcasm and sarcastic gossip: It depends on perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60(11). 3295–3309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. London: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancock, Jeffrey T., Philip J. Dunham & Kelly Purdy. 2000. Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development 1(2). 227–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kao, Justine T., Jean Y. Wu, Leon Bergen & Noah D. Goodman. 2014. Non-literal understanding of number words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(33). 12002–12007. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapogianni, Eleni. 2016. The ironist’s intentions. Pragmatics & Cognition 23(1). 150–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köder, Franziska & Ingrid Lossius Falkum. 2020. Children’s metonymy comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking and picture selection. Journal of Pragmatics 1561. 191–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J. & Gina M. Caucci. 2007. Lexical influences on the perception of sarcasm. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language — FigLanguages ’07, 1–4. Morristown, New Jersey: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J., Max A. Kassler, Lori Coppenrath & Bonnie McLain Allen. 1999. Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 31(12). 1685–1700. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J. & Richard M. Roberts. 1995. Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(1). 21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lai, Vicky Tzuyin, Tim Curran & Lise Menn. 2009. Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research 12841. 145–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leinonen, Eeva, Nuala Ryder, Margaret Ellis & Clair Hammond. 2003. The use of context in pragmatic comprehension by specifically language-impaired and control children. Linguistics 41(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massaro, Davide, Annalisa Valle & Antonella Marchetti. 2013. Irony and second-order false belief in children: What changes when mothers rather than siblings speak? European Journal of Developmental Psychology 10(3). 301–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzaggio, Greta, Alessandra Zappoli & Diana Mazzarella. 2023. Verbal irony and the implicitness of the echo. Pragmatics & Cognition 30(2). 412–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neys, Wim De & Walter Schaeken. 2007. When people are more logical under cognitive load. Experimental Psychology 54(2). 128–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsen, Elizabeth S., Melanie Glenwright & Vanessa Huyder. 2011. Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development 12(3). 374–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira A. & Andres Posada. 2003. Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85(2). 203–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, Henri, Sohvi Halonen, Penny M. Pexman & Tuomo Häikiö. 2023. Children’s processing of written irony: An eye-tracking study. Cognition 2381. 105508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, Penny M. & Melanie Glenwright. 2007. How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony? Journal of Neurolinguistics 20(2). 178–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, Penny M., Lenka Zdrazilova, Devon McConnachie, Kirby Deater-Deckard & Stephen A. Petrill. 2009. “That was smooth, mom”: Children’s production of verbal and gestural irony. Metaphor and Symbol 24(4). 237–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pouscoulous, Nausicaa, Ira A. Noveck, Guy Politzer & Anne Bastide. 2007. A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition 14(4). 347–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Alexandra Perovic. 2023. Linguistic skills and socioeconomic status: Two oft forgotten factors in child metaphor comprehension. Children 10(12). 847. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Michael Tomasello. 2020. Early birds: Metaphor understanding in 3-year-olds. Journal of Pragmatics 1561. 160–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quintilian. 95AD. Institutio Oratoria. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ronderos, Camilo R. 2024. Teasing apart the effects of aptness and familiarity on the development of metaphor comprehension. Talk given at the “Meaning and Grammar Seminar” of the University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szücs, Márta & Anna Babarczy. 2017. The role of Theory of Mind, grammatical competence and metapragmatic awareness in irony comprehension. In Stavros Assimakopoulos (ed.), Pragmatics at its interfaces, 129–148. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ţurcan, Alexandra & Ruth Filik. 2016. An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 42(12). 1867–1893. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whalen, Juanita M. & Penny M. Pexman. 2010. How do children respond to verbal irony in face-to-face communication? The development of mode adoption across middle childhood. Discourse Processes 47(5). 363–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 1992. On verbal irony. Lingua 87(1–2). 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zajączkowska, Maria & Kirsten Abbot-Smith. 2020. “Sure I’ll help — I’ve just been sitting around doing nothing at school all day”: Cognitive flexibility and child irony interpretation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1991. 104942. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue