Article published In: ‘Only joking’: Negotiating offensive humour in interaction
Edited by Chi-Hé Elder, Eleni Kapogianni and Ibi Baxter-Webb
[Pragmatics & Cognition 32:1] 2025
► pp. 69–92
The comedian’s identity, audience’s perspective(s) and problematic jokes
Published online: 26 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24024.fil
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24024.fil
Abstract
This paper examines the interconnection of performers’ institutional identity, audience’s perspectives and offensive jokes in our contemporary world, where there are increasing debates on humourists’ rights to free speech and audience’s (or the target’s) right to face wants. Commonly, because of their social licence for deviant behaviour, humourists in public joking genres like stand-up comedy and satirical television shows play with the limits of jokes. However, people could take offence whether they are the target of the joke or not. Adopting a socio-cognitive pragmatics perspective, I explore the significance of participants’ institutional identity in performance humour and how institutional mapping of roles should determine saliency in the interpretation of humorous cues. Using Trevor Noah’s France world cup joke, I argue that the interactional structure of performance humour allows comedians to privatise common ground features while the audience cannot adopt the same egocentric strategy in the interpretation of jokes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Dynamic model of meaning (DMM) and participants’ institutional role
- 4.Trevor’s France World Cup Joke (TFWCJ)
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (45)
Adetunji, Akin. 2013. The interactional context of humour in Nigerian stand-up comedy. Pragmatics 23(1). 1–22.
Aarons, Debra & Marc Mierowsky. 2017. How to do things with jokes: Speech acts in stand-up comedy. The European Journal of Humour Research 5(4). 158–168.
Aljazeera. Oct. 31 2020. Macron says he understands Muslims’ shock over Prophet cartoons. [URL]
Attardo, Salvatore. 2020. The linguistics of humour: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2017. The GTVH and humorous discourse. In Wladyslaw Chlopicki & Dorota Brzozowska (eds.), Humorous discourse, 93–105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Carell, Amy. 1997. Humour communities. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 10(1). 11–24.
Colston, Herber L. 2008. A new look at common ground: Memory, egocentrism, and joint meaning. In Istvan Kecskes & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer, 151–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Comedy Central UK. Did Africa just win the world cup: The daily show with Trevor Noah. [URL] (Accessed 12 February, 2024)
Drew, Paul & John Heritage. 1992. Analysing talk at work: An introduction. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dynel, Marta. 2009. Humorous garden-paths: A pragmatic-cognitive study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
. 2012. Garden paths, red lights and crossroads: On finding our way to understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying jokes. Israeli Journal of Humour Research 1(1). 6–28.
Ermida, Isabel. 2012. News satire in the press: Linguistic construction of humour in spoof news articles. In Jan Chovanec & Isabel Ermida (eds.), Language and humour in the media, 185–210. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Etogho, Elvine Belinda Andjembe, Syhynx Egbe-Mbah Eben & Amy L. Dalton. 2023. French neocolonialism in Africa: Historical overview and summary of current events. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 81(5).
Filani, Ibukun. 2021. The stand-up comedian as an egocentric communicator. Intercultural Pragmatics 18(1). 1–23.
. 2017. On joking contexts: An example of stand-up comedy. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 30(4). 439–460.
. 2015. Discourse types in stand-up performances: An example of Nigerian stand-up comedy. European Journal of Humour Research 3(1). 41–60.
Giora, Rachael. 2003. On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glick, Douglas J. 2007. Some performative techniques of stand-up comedy: An exercise in the textuality of temporalization. Language and Communication 271. 291–306.
Greenbaum, Andrea. 1999. Stand-up comedy as rhetorical argument: An investigation of comic culture. Humour 12(1). 33–46.
Hutchby, Ian. 1996. Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. New York: Routledge.
Irvine, Judith. 2022. Revisiting theory and method in language ideology research. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 32(1). 222–236.
Keysar, Boaz. 2008. Egocentric processes in communication and miscommunication. In Istvan Kecskes & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer, 277–296. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kramer, Elise. 2011. The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke arguments. Language and Society 40(2). 137–168.
Krefting, Rebecca. 2014. All joking aside: American humour and its discontents. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Kuipers, Giselinde. 2011. The politics humour in the public sphere: Cartoons, power and modernity in the first transnational humour scandal. European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(1). 63–80.
Linares-Bernabéu, Esther. 2023. Co-constructing humour and gender identity in live stand-up comedy. In Esther Linares-Bernabéu (ed.), The pragmatics of humour in interactive contexts, 200–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Martin, Rod A. 2014. Humour and gender: An overview of psychological research. In Delia Chiaro & Raffaella Baccolini (eds.), Gender and humour: Interdisciplinary and international perspectives, 123–146. New York: Routledge.
Mintz, Lawrence. 1985. Stand-up comedy as social and cultural mediation. American Quarterly 37(1). 71–80.
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor. 2019. Performing gender through stand-up comedy in Spanish. European Journal of Humour Research 7(2). 67–86.
. 2016. Metapragmatics of humour: Variability, negotiability and adaptability in humorous monologues. In Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo (ed.), Metapragmatics of humour, 79–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2015. Phraseology for humour in Spanish: Types, functions and discourse. Lingvisticæ Investigatines: International Journal of Linguistics and Language Resources 38(2). 191–212.
Santiago, Marina & Sarah Seewoester Cain. 2017. Audience affiliation, membership categories, and the construction of humour in stand-up comedy. In Wladyslaw Chlopicki & Dorota Brzozowska (eds.), Humorous discourse, 155–177. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scarpetta, Fabiola & Anna Spagnolli. 2009. The interactional context of humour in stand-up comedy. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 42(3). 210–230.
Seizer, Susan. 2011. On the uses of obscenity in live stand-up comedy. Anthropological Quarterly 84(1). 209–234.
Sunday, Adesina Bukunmi & Ibukun Filani. 2018. Playing with culture: Nigerian stand-up comedians joking with cultural beliefs and representations. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 32(1). 97–124.
Tsakona, Villy. 2021. Recontextualizing humour: Rethinking the analysis and teaching of humour. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2017. Genres of humour. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humour, 489–503. New York: Routledge.
Vigouroux, Cecile B. 2015. Genre, heteroglossic performances, and new identity: Stand-up comedy in modern French society. Language in Society 441. 243–272.
Yus, Francisco. 2016. Humour and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
