Cover not available

Article published In: The Speech Act(ion) of Commenting in Social Media and Beyond
Edited by Robert Külpmann and Rita Finkbeiner
[Pragmatics & Cognition 31:2] 2024
► pp. 294–317

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Is commenting an expositive illocutionary act?

ORCiD logo with link | University of Trieste
Published online: 17 January 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24015.sbi
Abstract
The paper outlines an analysis of the act of commenting within the author’s Austin-inspired speech-act theoretical framework. The general lines of that framework are concisely expounded, and it is suggested that the act of commenting should be described as belonging to Austin’s Expositives. The preliminary problem whether the act of commenting is illocutionary at all (given the absence of a performative use of the verb “to comment”) is discussed, and it is argued that nothing stands in the way of analyzing it as illocutionary. Some difficulties that can be found in dealing with commenting as an illocutionary act, concerning the variable linguistic form and the diversity of functions of the utterances that can be taken to be comments, are illustrated and discussed within the theoretical framework adopted. The characterization of commenting as having (among others) also a specifically expositive illocutionary effect is illustrated. Finally, some open problems worthy of further discussion are highlighted.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.An Austin-inspired theoretical framework
  • 3.A preliminary hurdle to the analysis of commenting as an illocutionary act
  • 4.The variety of linguistic forms and functions of comments
    • i.Sentence type
    • ii.Size
    • iii.Lexicon
    • iv.Non-verbal means
      • a.Kinds of object
      • b.Purposes
      • c.Attitude expressed
      • d.Interactional functions
  • 5.How to account for the problems raised by the variety of form and function of comments
  • 6.The illocutionary effect of comments
  • 7.Concluding remarks
    • i.The illocutionary pluralism of comments
    • ii.How comments are made recognizable
    • iii.Pairs, triplets and the place of action
  • Note
  • References
References (30)
References
Austin, John L. 1975. How to do things with words (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979. Philosophical papers. (3rd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finnegan (eds.). 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Educational.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper. 1989. Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics. In Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, 1–34. New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The comment clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2015. The semantics of free indirect discourse: How texts allow us to mind-read and eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Casey Rebecca. 2019. Investigating illocutionary monism. Synthese 1961. 1151–1165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Some varieties of illocutionary pluralism. In Laura Caponetto & Paolo Labinaz (eds.), Sbisà on speech as action, 121–141. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larrory-Wunder, Anne. 2021. Zur kommentativen Funktion von Ausrufesätzen. In Anne-Françoise Ehrhard-Macris & Gilbert Magnus (eds.), Text und Kommentieren im Deutschen, 179–193. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin. 2021. Illocutionary pluralism. Synthese 1991. 6687–6714. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 81. 339–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posner, Roland. 1972. Theorie des Kommentierens: eine Grundlagenstudie zur Semantik und Pragmatik. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980. Types of dialogue: The functions of commenting. Discourse Processes 31. 381–398.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redder, Angelika. 2008. Functional pragmatics. In Gerd Antos & Eija Ventola (eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication, 133–178. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 1984. On illocutionary types. Journal of Pragmatics 81. 93–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Speech acts without propositions? Grazer Philosophische Studien 721. 155–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. How to read Austin. Pragmatics 171. 461–472.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Uptake and conventionality in illocution. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 51. 33–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. Locution, illocution, perlocution. In Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 25–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Some remarks about speech act pluralism. In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy, 227–243. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Essays on speech acts and other topics in pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. Austinian themes: Illocution, action, knowledge, truth, and philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider-Mizony, Odile. 2021. Kommentar als Anschlusskommunikation, Informationserweiterung, oder didaktische Intention? In Anne-Françoise Ehrhard-Macris & Gilbert Magnus (eds.), Text und Kommentieren im Deutschen, 17–30. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. & Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. Text and context. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue