Cover not available

Article published In: The Speech Act(ion) of Commenting in Social Media and Beyond
Edited by Robert Külpmann and Rita Finkbeiner
[Pragmatics & Cognition 31:2] 2024
► pp. 367–390

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Sisterhood construction through commenting by Chinese women

ORCiD logo with link | University of Porto
Published online: 17 January 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24010.wan
Abstract
This paper takes the form of a case study which examines to what extent a comment can be analyzed as a type of speech action. This study analyzed 507 replies to a post on a popular Chinese social media application, Xiaohongshu, which concerns feminist issues. A speech act analysis of these replies offers new insights on comments as a type of speech act by showing their constructive functions across intra-utterance, inter-utterance, and extra-textual contexts. Comments can facilitate the securing of hearer’s uptake of an illocutionary act, may modify the actual hearer’s uptake of another illocutionary act, and may ultimately contribute to the construction of sisterhood within a redefined context. The performance of comments in this study is grounded in a particular circumstance and is highly context-dependent. Nevertheless, this finding leaves open the possibility that comments may display other effects in different contexts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Sisterhood and feminism on the internet
    • 2.2Speech act theory
      • 2.2.1Taxonomy of illocutionary acts
      • 2.2.2Performance of illocutionary acts
      • 2.2.3Indirect speech acts and illocutionary pluralism
    • 2.3Comment
  • 3.The data
  • 4.Forms of comments
    • 4.1Comments in directives
    • 4.2Comments in assertions
  • 5.Commenting as an action
    • 5.1Performance of comments
    • 5.2Modifying hearer’s uptake
    • 5.3Constructing sisterhood
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (45)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borge, Steffen. 2013. Questions. In Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 411–444. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The comment clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Jess. 2013. For white girls only?: Post-feminism and the politics of inclusion. Feminist Formations 25(1). 35–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark-Parsons, Rosemary. 2021. “I SEE YOU, I BELIEVE YOU, I STAND WITH YOU”: #MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility. Feminist Media Studies 21(3). 362–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coffey, Julia & Kanai, Akane. 2021. Feminist fire: Embodiment and affect in managing conflict in digital feminist spaces. Feminist Media Studies 23(2). 638–655. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davison, Alice. 1975. Indirect speech acts and what to do with them. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 143–185. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Díaz-Carrión, Isis Arlene. 2023. Sisterhood to promote the rhizomatic bodies of Mexican-mestiza women mountaineers. Gender, Place & Culture 30(2). 256–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2022. Common ground in linguistic theory and internet pragmatics: Forms of dynamic multicultural interaction. In Istvan Kecskes (eds), The Cambridge handbook of intercultural pragmatics, 245–273. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diez, Illari & Bossio, Juan. 2023. Women’s solidarity as feminism in action: The concept of sisterhood (sororidad) in #LasRespondonas, a Facebook group in Peru. Information Technology for Development 30(2). 229–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gill, Rosalind. 2007. Post-feminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10(2). 147–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology 18(1). 35–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, Jingyi, Ziwei Zhang, Jinhong Song, Lu Jin, Duan Yu & Sara Liao. 2022. Femvertising and postfeminist discourse: Advertising to break menstrual taboos in China. Women’s Studies in Communication 45(3). 378–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2009. Speech acts. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics, 1000–1009. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroløkke, Charlotte & Sørensen, Anne Scott. 2006. Gender communication theories & analyses: From silence to performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labinaz, Paolo & Sbisà, Marina. 2021. Speech acts and the dissemination of knowledge in social networks. In Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland (eds.), Approaches to internet pragmatics: Theory and practice, 145–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin. 2021. Illocutionary pluralism. Synthese 1991. 6687–6714. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, Sara. 2019. Wang Hong fashion culture and the post-feminist time in China. Fashion Theory 25(5). 663–685. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malinowska, Ania. 2020. Waves of feminism. In Karen Ross, Ingrid Bachmann, Valentina Cardo, Sujata Moorti & Cosimo Marco Scarcelli (eds.), The international encyclopedia of gender, media, and communication, 1–7. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, Jessica, Sophia Maalsen & Sarah Prebble. 2019. A feminist perspective on digital geographies: Activism, affect and emotion, and gendered human-technology relations in Australia. Gender, Place & Culture 26(5). 740–761. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2012. What is a context? In Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer & Petra B. Schumacher (eds), What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges, 9–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, Ealasaid. 2013. Feminism: A fourth wave? Political Insight 4(2). 22–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nau, Charlotte, Jinman Zhang, Anabel Quan-Haase & Kaitlynn Mendes. 2023. Vernacular practices in digital feminist activism on Twitter: Deconstructing affect and emotion in the #MeToo movement. Feminist Media Studies 23(5). 2046–2062. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pálmadóttir, Valgerður, Evelina Johansson-Wilén & Eva Schmitz. 2023. Collective identity, solidarity, and sisterhood in the ASAB cleaning women’s strike in Sweden and the Women’s day off in Iceland. Labor History 64(5). 478–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodak, Lidia. 2020. Sisterhood and the fourth wave of feminism: An analysis of circles of women in Poland. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 10(1s). 116S–134S. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 1984. On illocutionary types. Journal of Pragmatics 81. 93–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Speech acts in context. Language & Communication 221. 421–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Uptake and conventionality in illocution. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5(1). 33–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina & Turner, Ken. 2013. Introduction. In Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 1–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2023. Essays on speech acts and other topics in pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Kimberly T. & Carpenter, Nathan J. 2019. Sharing #MeToo on Twitter: Incidents, coping responses, and social reactions. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion 39(1). 87–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. R. 1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7(1). 3–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1964. Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73(4). 439–460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Yun & Tavmen, Güneş. 2024. New outlets of digital feminist activism in China: The #SeeFemaleWorkers campaign. Feminist Media Studies, 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witek, Maciej. 2005. An interactional account of illocutionary practice. Language Sciences 471. 43–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Three approaches to the study of speech acts. Dialogue and Universalism 23(1). 129–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Irony as a speech action. Journal of Pragmatics 1901. 76–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Tegan. 2017. #Intersectionality: The fourth wave feminist Twitter community. Atlantis 38(1). 54–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue