Article published In: The Speech Act(ion) of Commenting in Social Media and Beyond
Edited by Robert Külpmann and Rita Finkbeiner
[Pragmatics & Cognition 31:2] 2024
► pp. 339–366
Specified compliments in comments to politicians’ Facebook posts
Champion, loser, or both?
Published online: 17 January 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24008.shu
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24008.shu
Abstract
This article discusses “specified compliments” consisting of a positive evaluation of an ability or achievement; a preposition; and an area of expertise or excellence, e.g. “experts in security”. An analysis of 74 examples in comments on politicians’ Facebook posts during 2020–2021 revealed that specified compliments convey a predominantly ironic meaning in order to criticize the complimentee. Three different categories of ironic specified compliments are identified: (1) compliments where the area of expertise is positive and are interpreted as ironical based on their linguistic and extralinguistic context; (2) compliments where the area of expertise is negative and are thus understood as insincere; and (3) compliments in which the area of expertise is apparently positive but less than other areas, and therefore they are paradoxically interpreted as both sincere compliments in a specific area and a condemnation in general.
Keywords: compliments, irony, condemnation, readers’ comments, Facebook
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The speech act of complimenting
- 3.Specified compliments: The construction and its meaning
- 4.Compliments in readers’ comments on politicians’ Facebook pages
- 5.Corpus and methodology
- 6.Specified compliments: Pragmatic meanings and functions
- 6.1General data
- 6.2Sincere specified compliment
- 6.3Ironic specified compliment: Type 1
- 6.4Ironic specified compliment: Type 2
- 6.5Ironic specified compliment: Type 3
- 7.Conclusions
- Notes
References
References (44)
Ariel, Mira. 1998. Discourse markers and form-function correlations. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory, 223–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brown, Penelope & Steven S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Rong. 2010. Compliment and compliment response research: A cross-cultural survey. In Anna Trosborg (ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures, 79–101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Danziger, Roni. 2020. The pragmatics of flattery: The strategic use of solidarity-oriented actions. Journal of Pragmatics 1701. 413–425.
. 2021. The democratic king: The role of ritualized flattery in political discourse. Discourse & Society 32(6). 645–665.
Dynel, Marta. 2018. Irony, deception and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Edmondson, Willis J. & Juliane House. 1981. Let’s talk, and talk about it: A pedagogic interactional grammar of English. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
Edmondson, Willis J., Juliane House & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2023. Expressions, speech acts and discourse: A pedagogic interactional grammar of English. Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Hoffmann, Christian R. 2013. E(-lectronic) schmoozing? A cross-generic study of compliments in blog comments. In Katrin Röder & Ilse Wischer (eds.), Anglistentag Potsdam 2012: Proceedings, 341–357. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Holmes, Janet. 1986. Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics 281. 485–508.
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2023a. Learning Chinese in a study abroad context: The case of ritual congratulating. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 33(3). 459–475.
. 2023b. Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching. 1–12.
Isaacs, Ellen A. & Herbert H. Clark. 1990. Ostensible invitations. Language in Society 19(4). 493–509.
Jaworski, Adam. 1995. “This is not an empty compliment!” Polish compliments and the expression of solidarity. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 51. 63–94.
Johnson, Thomas J. & David D. Perlmutter. 2010. Introduction: The Facebook election. Mass Communication and Society 13(5). 554–559.
Jucker, Andreas. H. 2009. Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1611–1635.
Katriel, Tamar. 1986. Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli Sabra culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1993. Lefargen: A study in Israeli semantics of social relations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1). 31–53.
Kopytowska, Monika. 2013. Blogging as the mediatization of politics and a new form of social interaction: A case study of ‘proximization dynamics’ in Polish and British political blogs. In Piotr Cap & Urszula Okulska (eds.), Analyzing genres in political communication, 379–421. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kruikemeier, Sanne. 2014. How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior 341. 131–139.
Lehti, Lotta. 2011. Blogging politics in various ways: A typology of French politicians’ blogs. Journal of Pragmatics 431. 1610–1627.
Livnat, Zohar & Il-il Yatziv. 2003. Causality and justification: The causal marker ki in Spoken Hebrew. Revue de Semantique et Pragmatique 131. 99–119.
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2012. “Was that a compliment?” Implicit compliments in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 44(8). 980–996.
Manes, Joan & Nessa Wolfson. 1981. The compliment formula. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situation and prepatterned speech (vol. 21), 115–132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Manning, Nathan, Ruth A. Penfold-Mounce, Brian D. Loader, Ariadne Vromen & Michael Xenos. 2017. Politicians, celebrities and social media: A case of informalisation? Journal of Youth Studies 20(2). 127–144.
Morton, Jessica S., Moïra Mikolajczak & Olivier Luminet. 2022. New perspectives on the praise literature: Towards a conceptual model of compliment. Current Psychology 41(9). 6038–6050.
Nilsson, Bo. 2012. Politicians’ blogs: Strategic self-presentations and identities. Identity 12(3). 247–265.
Perelman, Chaïm & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (transl. by John Wilkinson & Purcell Weaver). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Placencia, Elena María & Amanda Lower. 2013. “Your kids are stinking cute”: Complimenting behavior on Facebook among family and friends. Intercultural Pragmatics 101. 617–646.
. 2017. Compliments and compliment responses. In Christian R. Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of social media, 633–660. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quintilian. 1920. Instituto oratoria (with an English translation by Harold Edgeworth Butler) (vol. 11). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina. 2020. “Hero, genius, king, and Messiah”: Ironic echoing in pro-ethos and anti-ethos readers’ comments on Facebook posts. In Zohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar & Galia Hirsch (eds.), The discourse of indirectness: Cues, voices and functions, 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2022. “There is no one like you Bibi”: Israelis write to the Prime Minister. Israel Studies in Language and Society 151. 138–159. [in Hebrew]
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina & Galia Hirsch. 2023. What kind of laughter? The triple function of “Hhh” as a contempt, interpretation, and intention marker. Pragmatics.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
Trammell, Kaye D., Andrew P. Williams, Monica Postelnicu & Kristen D. Landreville. 2006. Evolution of online campaigning: Increasing interactivity in candidate websites and blogs through text and technical features. Mass Communication & Society 9(1). 21–44.
Weizman, Elda. 2008. Positioning in media dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer (eds.). 2015. Follow-ups in political discourse: Explorations across contexts and discourse domain. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
