Cover not available

Article published In: Controversies, Communication and the Body
Edited by Joseph Lehmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3] 2016
► pp. 461–471

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Terror and the Leviathan

Recognition, ordeal and discourse in dispute resolution

 | Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
Published online: 20 July 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.3.08bar
The article surveys the history of “terror” vis a vis the development of international humanitarian and human rights law. During the French Revolution, the word “terror” was coined to describe a deviation from the laws of war. Justified by a mixture of ideology and necessity. People who resort to terrorism either suspends or rejects the laws of war (jus in bellum) in the name of an alternative and heightened sense of truth. However, the terrorists’ strong sense of probity and mission is also an opening for re-establishing communication, arbitration and mitigation of cruelty and destruction. This paper represents International Humanitarian Law (IHL) as an “abstract Leviathan”, submission to which is the contemporary norm of pacification. From the perspective of radical terrorism, it is tyrannical. From other perspectives, it is open to criticism and change. Most importantly, it is on the side of rational arbitration rather than arbitrary ordeal. Even radical terrorism, which refuses to recognize the legitimacy of the abstract Leviathan, seeks to communicate its radical messages rather than to seek victory my means of physical annihilation of its opponents.
References (23)
Bibliography
Blau, A. 2009. Hobbes on corruption. History of Political Thought 301. 596–616.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burleigh, M. 2009. Terrorism and the state. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dascal, M. 1998. Types of polemics and types of polemical moves. In S. Cmejrkova, J. Hoffmannova, O. Mullerova & J. Svetla (eds.), Dialogue Analysis VI (= Proceedings of the 6th Conference, Prague 1996), vol. 11, 15–33. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrison, A.H. 2006. Defining terrorism. Criminal Justice Studies 171. 259–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Girard, R. 1977. Violence and the sacred. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heinzen, K.P. 1881. Murder and liberty. Indianapolis: H. Lieber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan. St. Paul’s Churchyard: Andrew Crooke.
Horne, A. 1978. A savage war of peace: Algeria 1954-1962. New York: Viking.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, H. 2016. Caliphate: The history of an idea. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liston, R. 1977. Terrorism. New York: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McPhee, P. 2016. Liberty or death: The French revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mesquite and Dickson. 2007. The propaganda of the deed.
Niebuhr, R. 1941. Nature and the destiny of man, vol. 11. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parry, A. 1976. Terrorism: From Robespierre to Arafat. New York: Vangaurd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porter, B. 1987. Origins of The Vigilant State. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robertson, G. 2006. The Tyrannicide brief: The story of the man who sent Charles I to the Scaffold Knopf Doubleday. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robespierre, M. 1794. Report upon the principles of political morality. Philadelphia: Benjamin Franklin Bache.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taussig, M. 1992. The Nervous System. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teitel, R.G. 2011. Humanity’s law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 1989. Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whelehan, N. 2012. The dynamiters: Irish nationalism and political violence in the wider world, 1867-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitman, J.Q. 2012. The Verdict of Battle: The law of victory and the making of modern war. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wills, G. 1995. To keep and bear arms. New York Review of Books. September 21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Barilan, Y. Michael & Oren Asman
2017. Research Ethics, Military Medical Ethics, and the Challenges of International Law. The American Journal of Bioethics 17:10 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue