Cover not available

Article published In: Controversies, Communication and the Body
Edited by Joseph Lehmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3] 2016
► pp. 437–460

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Marcelo Dascal’s Theory of Controversies

Reconsideration, adaption, and political implications

 | Tel Aviv University
Published online: 20 July 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.3.07sar
In his Theory of Controversies, Marcelo Dascal proposed three types of polemic exchange, in which Controversy was added to the classic types of Discussion and Dispute. For example, in Dascal’s lights, logic is associated with polemic discussions, power manipulations with disputes, and ‘soft logic’ with controversies. The theory was remarkably successful in providing a realist framework for polemic exchanges. In this paper, I provide a conceptually independent substantiation and expansion of the theory, by associating it with meta-ethical analysis of thick and thin concepts, indebted to Michael Walzer, Menachem Fisch and Yitzhak Benbaji.
References (29)
References
Barghouti, Omar. 2005. Ethical implications of de-dichotomization of identities in conflict. In Marcelo Dascal & Pierluigi Barrotta (eds.), Controversies and subjectioity, 325–335. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1962. Does political theory still exists? In Peter Laslett & W.G. Runciman (eds.), Philosophy, politics, and society, 1–33. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Hang-Lian. 2005. Intersubjectivity in controversy: A story from the Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi. In Marcelo Dascal & Pierluigi Barrotta (eds.), Controversies and subjectivity, 173–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniel,Bar-Tal & Schnell, Izhak. 2014. Introduction: Occupied and Occupiers –The Israeli Case. In Daniel Bar-Tal & Izhak Schnell (eds.), The impacts of lasting occupation: Lessons from Israeli society, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dascal, Marcelo. 1998. Types of polemics and types of polemical moves. In S. Čmejrková, J. Hoffmannová, O. Müllerová & J. Svetlá (eds.), Dialogue analysis VI, vol. 11, 15–33. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Nihil sine ratione à Blandior ratio. Accessed March 13, 2017. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005(a). Debating with myself and debating with others. In Marcelo Dascal & Pierluigi Barrotta (eds.), Controversies and subjetivity, 31–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005(b). The balance of reason. In Logic, thought and action, 27–47. Netherlands: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Dichotomies and types of debate. In Frans H. Van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Controversy and confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, 27–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Is there a controversy about the morality of the occupation and its implications? In Daniel Bar-Tal & Izhak Schnell (eds.), The impacts of lasting occupation: Lessons from Israeli society, 61–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisch, Menachem & Yitzhak Benbaji. 2011. The view from within. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geertz, Cliff. 1973. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Cliifford Geertz (ed.), The interpretation of cultures, 3–30. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. 2010. Religion and the early royal society. Science & Christian Belief 22 (1). 3–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leone, Massimiliano. 2005. Convrtion and controversy. In Marcelo Dascal & Pierluigi Brrotta (eds.), Controversies and subjectivity, 91–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikhail, John. 2007. Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(4). 143–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mishori, Daniel. 2014. Extrinsical or intrinsical necessity? Hobbes and Bramhall on Free Will. In Dana Riesenfeld & Giovanni Scarafile (eds.), Perspectives on theory of controversies and the ethics of communication, 39–48. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 2013. Science, faith, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riesenfeld, Dana. 2014. Brandom and the boy who cried wolf. In Dana Riesenfeld & Giovanni Scarafile (eds.), Perspectives on theory of controversies and the ethics of communication, 91–100. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roinila, Markku. 2014. Locke and Leibniz on the balance of reasons. In Dana Riesenfeld & Giovanni Scarafile (eds.), Perspectives on theory of controversies and the ethics of communication, 49–58. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1968. The thinking of thoughts: What is ‘‘Le Penseur’’ doing? In Gilbert Ryle (ed.), University Lectures, 18. University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoff. 2005. Moral realism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. October 6. Accessed March 13, 2017. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarantino, Quentino, Roger Avary & Lawrence Bender. 1994. Pulp fiction. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Väyrynen, Pekka. 2013. The lewd, the rude and the nasty: A study of thick concepts in ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Thick ethical concepts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. September 21. Accessed March 13, 2017. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1962. The idea of equality. In P.eter Laslett & W.G. Runciman (eds.), Philosophy, politics, and society, 110–131. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. n.d. A paradox in the theory of democracy. In Peter Laslett & W.G. Runciman (eds.), Philosophy, politics, and society, 71–87. London: Blackwell.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Khuluq, Lathiful, Sriharini Sriharini, Ahmad Izudin & Irwan Abdullah
2025. The Manipulation of Power and the Trafficking of Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Narratives from Indonesia. Journal of Human Trafficking 11:3 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue