Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 23:2 (2016) ► pp.259–283

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Two layers of overt untruthfulness

When irony meets metaphor, hyperbole or meiosis

 | University of Lódz
Published online: 20 July 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.2.03dyn
This philosophical-pragmatic paper discusses several forms of irony which rest on other figures of speech contingent on overt untruthfulness, namely the figures arising as a result of flouting the first maxim of Quality. It is argued that an ironic implicature may be piggybacked on another implicature, called “as if implicature”, originating from flouting the first maxim of Quality occasioned by metaphor. Metaphorical irony, which is subject to the irony-after-metaphor order of interpretation, exhibits a number of manifestations depending on the nature and scope of irony, and the scope of the subordinate metaphor. On the other hand, rather than giving rise to an as if implicature distinct from the irony-based one, hyperbole and meiosis, which are inherently evaluative, most typically overlap with ironically evaluative expressions, promoting meiotic and hyperbolic irony, frequently (wrongly, as will be claimed here) considered by researchers to rely on flouting Quantity maxims. However, cases of independent use of hyperbole or meiosis in ironic environment are also possible. Such invite two levels of untruthfulness and two implicatures.
References (71)
Bezuidenhout, A. 2001. “Metaphor and what is said: A defense of a direct expression view of metaphor”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 251: 156–186.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blair, H. 1842. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Halifax: William Milner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, E. 2006. “Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said”. Mind and Language 21(3): 280–309.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction”. Noûs 461: 587–634.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, E. and Hawthorne, J. 2008. “Sarcastic ‘Like’: A case study in the interface of syntax and semantics”. In John Hawthorne (ed), Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. and Wearing, C. 2015. “Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony”. Journal of Pragmatics 791: 79–92.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. 1997. Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, C. 2011. Hyperbole in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. 1997. “Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism”. Discourse Processes 231: 25–45.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension”. Pragmatics and Cognition 8(2): 277–324.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. and O’Brien, J. 2000. “Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishment of irony and hyperbole”. Discourse Processes 30(2): 179–199.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creusere, M. 2000. “A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children’s recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity”. Metaphor and Symbol 151: 29–45.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, M. 2011. “A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception”. International Review of Pragmatics 3(2): 137–165.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Irony from a neo–Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature”. Intercultural Pragmatics 10(3): 403–431.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “When does irony tickle the hearer? Towards capturing the characteristics of humorous irony”. In M. Dynel (ed), The Pragmatics of Humour Across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 289–320.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness”. Corpus Pragmatics 11: 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falk, L. 1990. “Between emphasis and exaggeration: Verbal emphasis in the English of Cape Breton Island”. In J. Black (ed), Papers from the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association. St John’s Memorial: University of Newfoundland, 39–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. 1988. Figuratively Speaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garmendia, J. 2010. “Irony is critical”. Pragmatics and Cognition 181: 397–421.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “She’s (not) a fine friend: ‘Saying’ and criticism in irony”. Intercultural Pragmatics 81: 41–65.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “The clash: Humor and critical attitude in verbal irony”. Humor 271: 641–659.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. 1999. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. 2000. “Irony in talk among friends”. Metaphor and Symbol 151: 5–27.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. and O’Brien, J. 1991. “Psychological aspects of irony understanding”. Journal of Pragmatics 161: 523–530.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. 1989a. “Logic and conversation”. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 22–40. [Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58; Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In D. Davison and G. Harman (eds), The Logic of Grammar. Dickenson: Encino, 64–75.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989b. “Further notes on logic and conversation”. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 41–57. [Grice, Herbert Paul. 1978. “Further notes on logic and conversation”. In P. Cole (ed), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 113–127.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamamoto, H. 1998. “Irony from a cognitive perspective”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–270.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, H. 1990. “A speech-act analysis of irony”. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 77–109.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, L. 1989. The Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, M. 2006. “Saying less and meaning less”. In B. Birner and G. Ward (eds), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–162.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapogianni, E. 2011. “Irony via ‘surrealism’”. In M. Dynel (ed), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51–68.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Irony and the Literal Versus Nonliteral Distinction: A Typological Approach with Focus on Ironic Implicature Strength. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Differences in use and function of verbal irony between real and fictional discourse: (mis)interpretation and irony blindness”. Humor 271: 597–618.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. and Glucksberg, S. 1989. “How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118(4): 374–386.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. and Roberts, R. 1995. “Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 101: 21–31.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S. and Brown, M. 1995. “How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1241: 3–21.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, H., Orton, D and Anderson, D. 1998. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Quantity, truthfulness and ironic effect”. Language Sciences 33(2): 305–315.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. 2004. “‘There’s millions of them’: Hyperbole in everyday conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 361: 149–184.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nemesi, A. 2010. “Data-gathering methods in research on hyperbole production and interpretation”. In E.T. Nemeth and K. Bibok (eds), The Role of Data at the Semantic-Pragmatic Interface. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 381–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, N.R. 2004. “Hyperbole, extreme case formulations”. Journal of Pragmatics 361: 1727–1739.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. 2006. The Linguistics of Laughter. A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Irony and the reversal of evaluation”. Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1547–1569.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, P., Ferretti, T. and Katz, A. 2000. “Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony”. Discourse Processes 291: 201–222.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. 1986. “Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims”. Human Studies 91: 219–229.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popa, M. 2009. Figuring the Code: Pragmatic Routes to the Non-literal. PhD Dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Ironic metaphor interpretation”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 331: 1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preminger, A. (ed). 1974. Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, R. and Kreuz, R. 1994. “Why do people use figurative language?” Psychological Science 51: 159–163.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seto, K. 1998. “On non-echoic irony”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 240–255.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, J. 1657. Mysterie of Rhetorique Unvail’d. Facsimile reprint of 1st ed., London: George Everfden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1981. “Irony and the use-mention distinction”. In P. Cole (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 295–313.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto, and Yamanashi”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283–293.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spitzbardt, H. 1965. “English adverbs of degree and their semantic fields”. Philologica Pragensia 81: 349–359.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, J. 2000. Metaphor in Context. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Utsumi, A. 2000. “Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony”. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1777–1806.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, J. 2003. “Truthfulness”. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–48.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, K. 2015. “Meiosis, hyperbole, irony”. Philosophical Studies, 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1995. “Is there a maxim of truthfulness?” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 71: 197–212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?” Lingua 1161: 1722–1743.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1992. “On verbal irony”. Lingua 871: 53–76.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000 [2002, 2012]. “Truthfulness and relevance”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 215–254. [Reprinted as Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. “Truthfulness and relevance”. Mind 111: 583–632; “Truthfulness and relevance”. In D. Wilson and D. Sperber. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–83]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Explaining irony”. In D. Wilson and D. Sperber (eds), Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–145.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamanashi, M. 1998. “Some issues in the treatment of irony and related tropes”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 271–281.   Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (20)

Cited by 20 other publications

Gramanich Štromajer, Richard
2025. Comparative Analysis of the Terms Understatement and Meiosis in Academic Literature. Nová filologická revue 17:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Peña-Cervel, Mª Sandra
2025. Sources of incongruity in advertising. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Neuhaus, Laura
2023. Irony and Its Overlap with Hyperbole and Understatement. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2021. Metaphor and irony. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Barnden, John
2025. Oxymoron and its interplay with metaphor and irony. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Livnat, Zohar
2020. “My refrigerator is as much in the dark as I am”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316], ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Sullivan, Arthur
2019. The varieties of verbal irony: a new neo-Gricean taxonomy. Lingua 232 ► pp. 102740 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta & Fabio IM Poppi
2018. In tragoedia risus: Analysis of dark humour in post-terrorist attack discourse. Discourse & Communication 12:4 ► pp. 382 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2016. Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. Chapter 6. Implicitness via overt untruthfulness. In Implicitness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 276], ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. The Irony of Irony: Irony Based on Truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. Academics vs. American scriptwriters vs. academics: A battle over the etic and emic “sarcasm” and “irony” labels. Language & Communication 55 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2018. Deconstructing the myth of positively evaluative irony. In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2018. Irony in Language Use and Communication. Journal of Pragmatics 135 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2019. Ironic intentions in action and interaction. Language Sciences 75 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2020. To Say the Least: Where Deceptively Withholding Information Ends and Lying Begins. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2 ► pp. 555 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2023. Irony and Humor. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony, Affect, and Related Figures. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue