Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 23:2 (2016) ► pp.209–237
Intentionality and Internal Models in artificial agents
Published online: 20 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.2.01bae
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.2.01bae
References (68)
Barsalou, L.W., Breazeal, C. and Smith, L.B. 2007. “Cognition as coordinated non-cognition”. Cognitive Processing 8(2): 79–91.
Blakemore, S.J., Rees, G. and Frith, C.D. 1998. “How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study”. Elsevier Science 36(6).
Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D. and Frith, C.D. 2000. “Why can’t you tickle yourself”. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 11(11).
Dearden, A. and Demiris, Y. 2005. “Learning forward models for robots”. In
Int. Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence
. Edimburgh, 14401.
Dearden, A. 2008. Developmental Learning of Internal Models for Robotics. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
Demiris, Y. and Khadhouri, B. 2006. “Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition of actions. Robotics and autonomous systems”. The Social Mechanisms of Robot Programming from Demonstration 54(5): 361–369.
Dewey, J. 1896. The Metaphysical Assumptions of Materialism, Chapter the Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. Early Works 5 (EW. 5).
. 1922. The Metaphysical Assumptions of Materialism, chapter Human Nature and Conduct. Middle Works 14 (MW.14).
Di Paolo E.A., Murase, K. and Asakura, T. (eds). 2003. Organismically-Inspired Robotics: Homeostatic Adaptation and Teleology Beyond the Closed Sensorimotor Loop Dynamical Systems Approach to Embodiment and Sociality. Australia: Advanced Knowledge International, pp. 19–42.
Dretske, F. 2000. Perception, Knowledge, and Belief: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dreyfus, H.L. 1979. What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 19721. New York: Harper & Row,
Escobar, E., Hermosillo, J. and Lara, B. 2012. “Self body mapping in mobile robots using vision and forward models”. Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.
Froese, T. and Ziemke, T. 2009. “Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind”. Artificial Intelligence 173(3-4): 466–500.
Gaona, W., Hermosillo, J. and Lara, B. 2012. “Distance perception in mobile robots as an emergent consequence of visual-motor cycles using forward models”. Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.
Gentsch, A. and Schütz-Bosbach, S. 2011. “I did it: Unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature”. Cognitive Neuroscience 23(12): 3817–3828.
Haruno, M., Wolpert, D.M. and Kawato, M. 2001. “Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control”. Neural Computation 131: 2201–2220.
Heidegger, M. 1985. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hoffmann, H. and Moeller, R. 2004. “Action selection and mental transformation based on a chain of forward models”. In Proceedings. of the 8th International. Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press, 213–222.
Hoffmann, H. 2007. “Perception through visuomotor anticipation in a mobile robot”. Neural Networks 201: 22–33.
Husserl, E. 1983. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Vol. 21. Netherlands: Kluwer.
Husserl, E., Sheehan, Thomas and Palmer, Richard E. (eds), 1997. Edmund Husserl: Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927-1931). Great Britain: Kluwer.
James, W. 1897. The Will to Believe and Other Popular Essays in Popular Philosophy. Longmans Green and Co. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1904. A World of Pure Experience. Chapter 2. Longmans Green and Co. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jazé, J-P. 2012. “El rol del saber no-proposicional en la explicación de la acción”. Memorias del I Coloquio Internacional de Ciencias Cognitivas.
Jordan, M.I. and Rumelhart, D.E. 1992. “Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher”. Cognitive Science 161: 307–354.
Kiverstein, J. 2007. “Could a robot have a subjective point of view?” Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7).
Lara, B., Rendon, J.M. and Capistran, M.A. 2007. “Prediction of multi-modal sensory situations a for- ward model approach”. In Proceedings of the
4th IEEE Latin America Robotics Symposium
, Vol. 11.
Metta, G., Sandini, G., Natale, L., Craighero, L. and Fadiga, L. 2006. “Understanding mirror neurons: a bio-robotic approach”. Interaction Studies 7: 2006.
Miall, R.C. and Wolpert, D.M. 1996. “Forward models for physiological motor control”. Neural Net-Works 9(8): 1265–1279.
Moeller, R. and Schenk, W. 2008. “Bootstrapping cognition from behavior— a computerized thought experiment”. Cognitive Science 32(3): 504–554.
Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. 1963. Computers and Thought, chapter GPS: A Program that Simulates Human Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O´Regan, J.K., Myin, E. and Noë, A. 2005. “Sensory consciousness explained (better) in terms of ‘corporality’ and ‘alerting capacity’”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 41: 369–387.
. 1998. “What pragmatism is”. In The Peirce Edition Project (ed.), The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2 (1893-1913). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 331–398.
Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L.W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M.H., McRae, K. and Spivey, M.J. 2011. “The mechanics of embodiment: A dialog on embodiment and computational modeling”. Frontiers in psychology 2(5).
Pezzulo, G., Can- didi, M., Dindo, H. and Barca, L. 2013. “Action simulation in the human brain: Twelve questions”. New Ideas in Psychology 31(3): 270–290.
Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of `Meaning´. In Mind, language, and reality: Philosophical papers of Hilary Putnam, Vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, R.C. 1981. “Internal representations: Prologue to a theory of intentionality”. Philosophical Topics 12(1).
Shapiro, L.A. 2011. Embodied Cognition. (New problems of philosophy). London and New York: Routledge.
Wilson, M. and Knoblich, G. 2005. “The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics”. Psycho- Logical Bulletin 1311: 460–473.
Wolpert, D.M., Miall, R.C. and Kawato, M. 1998. “Internal models in the cerebellum”. Elsevier Science 2(9).
Wolpert, D.M. and Ghahramani, Z. 2000. “Computational principles of movement neuroscience”. Nature Neuroscience 31: 1212–1217.
Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z. and Flanagan, J.R. 2001. “Perspectives and problems in motor learning”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(11): 487–494.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
