Cover not available

Article published In: New Theoretical Insights into Untruthfulness
Edited by Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1] 2016
► pp. 92–116

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension

 | University of Alicante
Published online: 29 September 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.05yus
According to relevance theory, irony comprehension invariably entails the identification of some opinion or thought (echo) and the identification of the speaker’s dissociative attitude. In this paper, it is argued that it is also essential for hearers to identify not only that propositional attitude, but also the affective attitude that the speaker holds towards the source of this echo so that an optimally relevant interpretive outcome is achieved. This notion comprises feelings and emotions of a non-propositional quality which affect the propositional effects obtained in ironical communication. The paper further argues for the need to incorporate non-propositional effects into the traditional propositional object of pragmatic research.
References (45)
References
Akimoto, Y., Sugiura, M., Yomogida, Y., Miyauchi, C.M., Miyazawa, S. and Kawashima, R. 2014. “Irony comprehension: Social conceptual knowledge and emotional response”. Human Brain Mapping 351: 1167–1178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arndt, H. and Janney, R.W. 1991. “Verbal, prosodic, and kinesic emotive contrasts in speech”. Journal of Pragmatics 151: 521–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aune, K.S. 1997. “Self and partner perceptions of the appropriateness of emotions”. Communication Reports 10(2): 133–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bromberek-Dyzman, K. 2012. “Affective twist in irony processing”. Humana.Mente 231: 83–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, C. and Janney, R.W. 1994. “Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication”. Journal of Pragmatics 221: 325–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. and Hall, A. 2011. “Implicature and explicature”. In H-J. Schmid and D. Geeraerts (eds), Cognitive Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 47–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curcó, C. 2000. “Irony: Negation, echo and metarepresentation”. Lingua 1101: 257–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fussell, Susan R. 2002. “The verbal communication of emotion: Introduction and overview.” In S.R. Fussell (ed), The Verbal Communication of Emotions. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Mahwah: L.E.A., 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garmendia, J. 2010. “Irony is critical”. Pragmatics & Cognition 18(2): 397–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Leggitt, J.S. and Turner, E.A. 2002. “What’s special about figurative language in emotional communication?” In S.R. Fussell (ed), The Verbal Communication of Emotions. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Mahwah: L.E.A., 125–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutt, E.-A. 2013. “How does the affective relate to ostensive-inferential communication?” Draft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hess, U. 2001. “The experience of emotion: Situational influences on the elicitation and experience of emotions”. In A. Kaszniak (ed), Emotions, Qualia, and Consciousness. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 386–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langlotz, A. and Locher, M.A. 2013. “The role of emotions in relational work”. Journal of Pragmatics 581: 87–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J.O. 2014. “Communication mechanism of ironic discourse”. Advanced Science and Technology Letters 521: 147–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leggitt, J.S. and Gibbs, R.W. 2000. “Emotional reactions to verbal irony”. Discourse Processes 29(1): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. 2000. “Intuition: A social-cognitive neuroscience approach”. Psychological Bulletin 1261: 109–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiese, M. 2014. “How can emotions be both cognitive and bodily?” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 131: 513–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, J. 2009. “Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects: Can a theory of utterance interpretation account for emotions in verbal communication?” Social Science Information 48(3): 447–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olsson, A. and Ochsner, K.N. 2007. “The role of social cognition in emotion”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(2): 66–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, M.T. and Simmons, K.B. 1995. “Communicating intentions through nonverbal behaviors”. Human Communication Research 22(1): 128–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickard, H. 2003. “Emotions and the problem of other minds”. In A. Hatzimoysis (ed), Philosophy and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 87–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piskorska, A. 2012. “Cognition and emotions -Jointly contributing to positive cognitive effects?” In A. Piskorska (ed.), Relevance Studies in Poland, Vol. 4. Essays on Language and Communication. Warsaw (Poland): WUW, 102–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Planalp, S. 1999. Communicating Emotion. Social, Moral, and Cultural Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rostomyan, A. 2012. “The vitality of emotional background knowledge in court”. Pólemos 6(2): 281–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. and Wilson, D. 2010. “Epistemic vigilance”. Mind & Language 25(4): 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1981. “Irony and the use-mention distinction”. In P. Cole (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 295–318.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Beyond speaker’s meaning”. Croatian Journal of Philosophy XV(44): 117–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strey, C. 2016. The Language of Emotions: An Ostensive-Inferential Study. PhD Thesis. Porto Alegre: PUCRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, T. 2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, A. 2000. “The attitudinal effects of prosody, and how they relate to emotion”. Paper delivered at ISCA Workshop on Speech and Emotion . University of Belfast, September.
Wilson, D. 2006. “The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?”. Lingua 1161: 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Irony and metarepresentation”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 211: 183–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics 59(A): 40–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1992. “On verbal irony”. Lingua 871: 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Wharton, T. 2005. “Relevance and prosody”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 171: 427–454.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, F. 2000a. “On reaching the intended ironic interpretation”. International Journal of Communication 10(1–2): 27–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. “Literal/nonliteral and the processing of verbal irony”. Pragmalingüística 8–91: 349–374.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Saturación contextual en la comprensión de la ironía”. In L. Ruiz Gurillo and X. Padilla García. Frankfurt (eds), Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 309–331.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. “Should relevance theory analyse what is non-propositional, non-intentional but yet affects the eventual relevance?” Paper delivered at Relevance Round Table Meeting 41. Kraków: Institute of English Studies, Jagiellonian University of Kraków, September.
. 2015b. “The discursive management of the phatic Internet (and how to explain it pragmatically)”. Paper delivered at Approaches to Digital Discourse Analysis (ADDA) . Valencia (Spain), November.
. 2015c. “Broadening the (propositional) scope of pragmatics in order to address the (non-propositional) quality of humorous effects”. Paper delivered at I Workshop on Advanced Studies of Humor and Gender (WASHUM) . Alicante (Spain): University of Alicante, November.
. 2016b. “Relevance theory and contextual sources-centred analysis of irony. Current research and compatibility”. In M. Padilla Cruz (ed), Relevance Theory: Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 147–171.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Bernabéu, Esther Linares
2024. Humorous Irony in Female Stand-Up Comedy: A Sociopragmatic Analysis. In Studying Verbal Irony and Sarcasm, ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Mazzarella, Diana & Nausicaa Pouscoulous
2023. Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:2 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Hess Zimmermann, Karina, Graciela Fernández Ruiz & Andrea Minerva Silva López
2021. ¿Para qué ironizamos? Reflexiones de adolescentes de 12 y 15 años sobre las funciones de la ironía verbal. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Piskorska, Agnieszka
2021. Being ambivalent by exploiting indeterminacy in the explicit import of an utterance. Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Wharton, Tim
2021. Relevance. Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Wharton, Tim, Constant Bonard, Daniel Dukes, David Sander & Steve Oswald
2021. Relevance and emotion. Journal of Pragmatics 181 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Ervas, Francesca
2020.  How nice does it sound?. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Galera Masegosa, Alicia
2020. The role of echoing in meaning construction and interpretation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
González, José Ángel, Lluís-F. Hurtado & Ferran Pla
2020. Transformer based contextualization of pre-trained word embeddings for irony detection in Twitter. Information Processing & Management 57:4 ► pp. 102262 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Moneva, Maria Angeles
2020. Humour and irony in George Mikes’ How to be a Brit . In Relevance Theory, Figuration and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8], ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Moneva, María Angeles
2019. Irony, humour and culture in George Mikes’ How to Be a Brit: relevance-theoretical perspectives. Diacronia :10 DOI logo
Ruiz-Moneva, María Angeles
2019. Ironie, umor și cultură în How to Be a Brit de George Mikes: perspective teoretice ale relevanței. Diacronia :10 DOI logo
Ruiz-Moneva, María Ángeles
2018. Irony and Parody in a Spanish Translation of Fowles’ "The French Lieutenant’s Woman": A Relevance-Theoretical Approach. Complutense Journal of English Studies 26 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Tong, Ying & Chaoqun Xie
2019. Lawrence N. Berlin, Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer (eds.) The dynamics of political discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups . Functions of Language 26:3 ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella
2018. Satire as a genre. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Diez-Arroyo, Marisa
2018. Metarepresentation and echo in online automobile advertising. Lingua 201 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2017. Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication. Journal of Pragmatics 114 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2018. Identity-related issues in meme communication. Internet Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2023. Inferring Irony Online. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Modeling Irony [Figurative Thought and Language, 12], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony in Linguistic Communication. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue