Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 30:1 (2023) ► pp.31–58

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Monolingual and bilingual children’s performance learning words from ostensive teaching

ORCiD logo with link | University of Oxford | University of Cambridge
ORCiD logo with link | University of Cambridge
Published online: 9 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22018.lor
Abstract
Children who grow up exposed to more than one language face a range of challenges and developmental environments which differ from those of monolinguals. Recently, studies have suggested that this may lead to differences in the development of pragmatic skills and sensitivity to socio-pragmatic cues. We investigate whether bilingually exposed children are able to make further use of these cues in an ostensive teaching setting for word learning in a sample of 110 children aged 4 to 6 years old and find evidence that bilingual children do perform significantly better in ostensive teaching settings when asked to use pragmatic cues to derive the meaning of a novel word. We discuss implications for theories of pragmatics and bilingual development.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Aims, research questions and hypotheses
  • 3.Experiment
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Tasks
      • 3.2.1Receptive vocabulary task
      • 3.2.2Ostensive teaching of subordinate category
        • 3.2.2.1Stimuli
        • 3.2.2.2Procedure
        • 3.2.2.3Coding of responses
      • 3.2.3Ostensive teaching of action word
        • 3.2.3.1Stimuli
        • 3.2.3.2Procedure
        • 3.2.3.3Coding of responses
        • 3.2.3.4Data analyses
    • 3.3Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion and limitations
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (66)
References
Akhtar, Nameera, Jennifer Menjivar, Elena Hoicka & Mark A. Sabbagh. 2012. Learning foreign labels from a foreign speaker: The role of (limited) exposure to a second language. Journal of child language 39(5). 1135–1149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antoniou, Kyriakos, Alma Veenstra, Mikhail Kissine & Napoleon Katsos. 2020. How does childhood bilingualism and bi-dialectalism affect the interpretation and processing of pragmatic meanings? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23(1). 186–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barac, Raluca & Ellen Bialystok. 2011. Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching 44(1). 36–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen. 1988. Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental psychology 24(4). 560. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen & Fergus I. M. Craik. 2010. Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind. Current directions in psychological science 19(1). 19–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen, Raluca Barac, Agnes Blaye & Diane Poulin-Dubois. 2010. Word mapping and executive functioning in young monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Cognition and Development 11(4). 485–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen, Gigi Luk, Kathleen F. Peets & Yang Sujin. 2010. Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(4). 525–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, Krista. 2017. Bilingualism affects 9-month-old infants’ expectations about how words refer to kinds. Developmental Science 20(1). e12486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, Krista & Janet F. Werker. 2009. Monolingual, bilingual, trilingual: Infants’ language experience influences the development of a word-learning heuristic. Developmental Science 12(5). 815–823. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Lexicon structure and the disambiguation of novel words: Evidence from bilingual infants. Cognition 128(3). 407–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cane, James E., Heather J. Ferguson & Ian A. Apperly. 2017. Using perspective to resolve reference: The impact of cognitive load and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 43(4). 591.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve. V. 2009. First language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csibra, Gergely & György Gergely. 2009. Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(4). 148–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dash, Tanya & Bhoomika R. Kar. 2020. Behavioural and ERP correlates of bilingual language control and general-purpose inhibitory control predicted by L1 and L2 proficiency. Journal of Neurolinguistics 561. 100914. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Denise & Dina Tell. 2005. Monolingual and bilingual children’s use of mutual exclusivity in the naming of whole objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 92(1). 25–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, Lloyd M. & Douglas M. Dunn. 2009. The British picture vocabulary scale. GL Assessment Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durang López, Ezequiel M. 2021. A bilingual advantage in memory capacity: Assessing the roles of proficiency, number of languages acquired and age of acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism 25(3). 606–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel de Abreu, Pascale M. J. 2011. Working memory in multilingual children: Is there a bilingual effect? Memory 19(5). 529–537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fan, Samantha P., Zoe Liberman, Boaz Keysar & Katherine D. Kinzler. 2015. The exposure advantage: Early exposure to a multilingual environment promotes effective communication. Psychological Science 26(7). 1090–1097. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Festman, Julia, Sophia Czapka & Adam Winsler. 2022. How many moderators does it take till we know… that too many bilingual advantage effects have died? In Kristin Kersten & Adam Winsler (eds.), Understanding variability in second language acquisition, bilingualism, and cognition, 80–127. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre. 1982. Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Stan Kuczaj (ed.), Language development: Language, thought and culture, 301–334. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goetz, Peggy. J. 2003. The effects of bilingualism on Theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6(1). 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, David W. 1998. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(2). 67–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Anastasia, Buddhika Bellana & Ellen Bialystok. 2013. Perspective-taking ability in bilingual children: Extending advantages in executive control to spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development 28(1). 41–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartanto, Andree & Hwajin Yang. 2019. Does early active bilingualism enhance inhibitory control and monitoring? A propensity-matching analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 45(2). 360.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Healey, Emma & Barbora Skarabela. 2008. Are children willing to accept two labels for a single object? A comparative study of mutual exclusivity in monolingual and bilingual children. In Proceedings of the Child Language Seminar 2007, 49–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horowitz, Alexandra C., Rose M. Schneider & Michael C. Frank. 2018. The trouble with quantifiers: Exploring children’s deficits in scalar implicature. Child Development 89(6). e572–e593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imai, Mutsumi, Lianjing Li, Etsuko Haryu, Hiroyuki Okada, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff & Jun Shigematsu. 2008. Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese-, English-, and Japanese speaking children. Child Development 79(4). 979–1000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katerelos, Marina, Diane Poulin-Dubois & Yuriko Oshima-Takane. 2011. A cross-linguistic study of word-mapping in 18-to 20-month-old infants. Infancy 16(5). 508–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, Barbara. J. 1994. The information continuum: Evolution of social information transfer in monkeys, apes, and hominids. School of American Research Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia. K. 2007. Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Developmental Science 10(1). 110–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Molly L. & Michael C. Frank. 2016. Understanding the effect of social context on learning: A replication of Xu and Tenenbaum 2007b. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145(9). e72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Zoe, Amanda L. Woodward, Boaz Keysar & Katherine D. Kinzler. 2017. Exposure to multiple languages enhances communication skills in infancy. Developmental Science 20(1). e12420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorge, Isabelle & Katsos, Napoleon. 2019. Listener-adapted speech: Bilinguals adapt in a more sensitive way. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(3). 376–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luk, Gigi, E. R. I. C. De Sa & Ellen Bialystok. 2011. Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(4). 588–595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markman, Ellen M. & Gwyn F. Wachtel. 1988. Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20(2). 121–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menjivar, Jennifer & Nameera Akhtar. 2017. Language experience and preschoolers’ foreign word learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(3). 642–648. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morales, Julia, Alejandra Calvo & Ellen Bialystok. 2013. Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114(2). 187–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolay, Anne-Catherine & Martine Poncelet. 2013. Cognitive advantage in children enrolled in a second-language immersion elementary school program for three years. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(3). 597–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, Barbara Zurer, Sylvia C. Fernández & D. Kimbrough Oller. 1993. Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning 43(1). 93–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, Barbara Z., Sylvia C. Fernández, Vanessa Lewedeg & D. Kimbrough Oller. 1997. The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics 18(1). 41–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Purić, Danka, Jasmina Vuksanović & Vasiliki Chondrogianni. 2017. Cognitive advantages of immersion education after 1 year: Effects of amount of exposure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1591. 296–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, Carolyn B. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray, David M. Johnson & Penny Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8(3). 382–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roseberry, Sarah, Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Parish-Morris, Julia & Golinkoff, Roberta M. 2009. Live action: Can young children learn verbs from video? Child Development 80(5). 1360–1375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, Paula & Sam Glucksberg. 2012. Reasoning about other people’s beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38(1). 211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scofield, Jason & Douglas A. Behrend. 2011. Clarifying the role of joint attention in early word learning. First Language 31(3). 326–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegal, Michael, Laura Iozzi & Luca Surian. 2009. Bilingualism and conversational understanding in young children. Cognition 110(1). 115–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegal, Michael, Ayumi Matsuo, Clair Pond & Y. Otsu. 2007. Bilingualism and cognitive development: Evidence from scalar implicatures. In Proceedings of the 8th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 265–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegal, Michael, Luca Surian, Ayumi Matsuo, Alessandra Geraci, Laura Iozzi, Yuko Okumura & Shoji Itakura. 2010. Bilingualism accentuates children’s conversational understanding. PloS One 5(2). e9004. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Thomas L. Griffiths. 2001. Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(4). 629–640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1995. Joint attention as social cognition. In Chris Moore & Philip J. Dunham (eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development, 103–130. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association 10(4). 401–413.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael & Nameera Akhtar. 1995. Two-year-olds use pragmatic cues to differentiate reference to objects and actions. Cognitive Development 10(2). 201–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria. 2014. Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(3). 283–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waxman, Sandra R. & Toby D. Kosowski. 1990. Nouns mark category relations: Toddlers’ and preschoolers’ word-learning biases. Child Development 61(5). 1461–1473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wermelinger, Stephanie, Anja Gampe & Moritz M. Daum. 2017. Bilingual toddlers have advanced abilities to repair communication failure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1551. 84–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodward, Amanda. 1993. The effect of labeling on children’s attention to objects. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Child Language Research Forum, 35–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Fei & Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2007a. Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review 114(2). 245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. Sensitivity to sampling in Bayesian word learning. Developmental Science 10(3). 288–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yow, W. Quin. 2015. Monolingual and bilingual preschoolers’ use of gestures to interpret ambiguous pronouns. Journal of Child Language 42(6). 1394–1407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yow, W. Quin & Ellen. M. Markman. 2011a. Bilingualism and children’s use of paralinguistic cues to interpret emotion in speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(4). 562–569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Young bilingual children’s heightened sensitivity to referential cues. Journal of Cognition and Development 12(1). 12–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. A bilingual advantage in how children integrate multiple cues to understand a speaker’s referential intent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(3). 391–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Children increase their sensitivity to a speaker’s nonlinguistic cues following a communicative breakdown. Child Development 87(2). 385–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue