Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 30:1 (2023) ► pp.59–91

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Mirative evidentials, relevance and non‑propositional meaning

ORCiD logo with link | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
 | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Published online: 9 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22012.ifa
Abstract
In this study, we are addressing the call for further research ( 2015. Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 239–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) into how languages, in our case Modern Greek, mark the unexpected. Our first research question is: Can we identify a class of mirative evidential markers in Modern Greek? The expected answer is that we can, if we take account of frequency rates in a variety of sources in the real world, namely plays, corpora and tags in social media. The second research question is: Do these markers convey propositional or non-propositional meaning? Our findings suggest that the Greek data involves predominantly non-propositional types of meaning since mirativity is not delivered by the semantic content of the utterance (e.g., Ooo! Tí vlépoun ta mátia mou? “Oh! What do I see?”, Ma ti les tóra? “But what are you saying now?”, Ba ba ti akoúo? “Well, well, what do I hear?” Mi mou pis! ‘Don’t tell me!’).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Mirative evidentiality
  • 3.The showing-meaning continuum
  • 4.The data
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Rationale
    • 5.2Sources of data
      • 5.2.1Plays
      • 5.2.2Corpora
      • 5.2.3Interviews and tags in social media
    • 5.3Procedure of analysis
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (64)
References
Adams, Reginald B. Jr., Ambady, Nalini, Macrae, C. Neil & Robert E. Kleck. 2006. Emotional expressions forecast approach-avoidance behavior. Motivation and Emotion 30(2). 179–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adams, Reginald B. Jr. & Robert E. Kleck. 2003. Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychological Science 141. 644–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion. Emotion 51. 3–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 435–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Evidentials: Their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 239–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 159–167. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barés Gómez, Cristina & Matthieu Fontaine. 2021. How surprising! Mirativity, evidentiality and abductive inference. In Teresa Lopez-Soto (ed.), Dialog Systems, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning 221, 115–136. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. & Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (vol. 201). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, Maria. 2011. The pragmatics of the Modern Greek modal particles θα, να, μη (ν) and ας. In Katerina Chatzopoulou, Alexandra Ioannidou & Suwon Yoon (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 322–332. Chicago, Illinois, USA, University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Basic illocutions of the MG indicative. In Zoe Gavriilidou, Angeliki Efthymiou, Evangelia Thomadaki & Penelope Kambakis-Vougiouklis (eds.), Selected papers of the 10th ICGL, 223–234. Komotini, Greece Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Basic illocutions of the Modern Greek subjunctive. In Nikolaos Lavidas, Thomaï Alexiou & Areti-Maria Sougari (eds.), Major Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics 1, 249–272. London: Versita-de Gruyter Open Poland. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1965. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1872) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25(1). 39–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 369–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douka, Maro. 2014. Ela na poume psemata [Let’s lie]. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenaus. 1972. Similarities and differences between cultures in expressive movements. In Robert A. Hinde (ed.), Non-verbal communication, 297–311. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Hongmei. 2018. Mirativity in Mandarin: The sentence-final particle Le (了). Open Linguistics 4(1). 589–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2003. Evidentiality in the Balkans with special attention to Macedonian and Albanian. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert Dixon (eds.), Studies in Evidentiality, 189–218. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heilbron, Micha & Maria Chait. 2018. Great expectations: Is there evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex? Neuroscience 3891. 54–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kess, Eli Nazareth Bechara, Roberto Gomes Camacho, Alessandra Regina Guerra, Taísa Peres de Oliveira, Eduardo Penhavel, Erotilde Goreti, Pezatti, Liliane Santana, Edson Rosa Francisco de Souza & Maria Luiza de Sousa Teixeira. 2007. Basic illocutions in the native languages of Brazil. Alfa: Revista de lingüística 51(2). 73–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and relevance (vol. 861). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly & Lemonia Tsavdaridou. 2021. Mirative evidentials and non-propositional meaning. Paper delivered at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Athens, 30 August-3 September 2021.
Ivanova-Sullivan, Tanya. 2007. Expressing surprise in Bulgarian: The meaning and use of the admirative. Unpublished manuscript. Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Irene Philippaki-Warburton. 1987. Modern Greek. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katsiveli, Stamatina. 2020. Marking the unexpected: The case of ba in Greek talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 1701. 55–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Ahrim. 2018. Utterance-final particle-canha in modern spoken Korean: A marker of shared knowledge, (im)politeness, theticity and mirativity. Linguistics 56(5). 995–1057. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Nam-Gyoon & Heejung Son. 2015. How facial expressions of emotion affect distance perception. Frontiers in Psychology 61. 1825. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraus, Kelsey. 2019. Intonation and expectation: English mirative contours and particles. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23(2). 19–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kriaras, Emmanouil. 1995. Neo Elliniko Lexiko tis Sinxronis Dimotikis Glossas [New dictionary of Modern Demotic Greek]. Athens: Ekdotiki Athinon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1993. Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics 4(2). 135–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, Cristina Sánchez. 2017. Mirativity in Spanish: The case of the particle mira. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association 15(2). 489–514.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Tessendorf (eds.) 2014. Body – Language – Communication (vol. 21). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, Anthony J., Adams, Reg B. Jr., Stevenson, Michael T., Weisbuch, Max & Michael I. Norton. 2013. Approach-avoidance movement influences the decoding of anger and fear expressions. Social Cognition 311. 745–757. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2010. Examining the mirative and nonliteral uses of evidentials. In Tyler Peterson & Uli Sauerland (eds.), Evidence from evidentiality (vol. 281), 129–159. University of British Columbia. Working Papers in Linguistics (UBCWPL).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Mirativity as surprise: Evidentiality, information, and deixis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45(6). 1327–1357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Problematizing mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 312–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plutchik, Robert. 1980. A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Robert Plutchik & Henry Kellerman (eds.), Theories of emotion, 3–33. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portner, Paul & Raffaella Zanuttini. 2000. The force of negation in Wh exclamatives and interrogatives. In Laurence Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds.), Negation and polarity. Syntactic and semantic perspectives, 201–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The semantics of nominal exclamatives. In Reinaldo, Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 57–67. The Netherlands: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisenzein, Rainer. 2000a. The subjective experience of surprise. In Herbert Bless & Joseph Forgas (eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior, 262–279. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion 141. 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisenzein, Rainer, Horstmann, Gernot & Achim Schützwohl. 2019. The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science 11(1). 50–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 34(5). 411–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Miratives across constructions and languages. Comuniación presentada en el 5th California Universities Semantics and Pragmatics. CUSP 5 – University of California, San Diego, 27–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. The semantics of emotive markers and other illocutionary content. [URL]
Rett, Jessica & Sarah Murray. 2013. A semantic account of mirative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT 231, 453–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2018. “Hashtags work everywhere”: The pragmatic functions of spoken hashtags. Discourse, Context & Media 221. 57–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Setatos, Michalis. 1994. Επιχειρηματολογικές χρήσεις του λέγω (Argumentative uses of λέγω [say]. In Michalis Setatos (ed.), Γλωσσολογικές μελέτες [Linguistic studies]. Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki B(4). 147–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 2015. Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy XV(44). 117–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Bustamante, Teresa. 2013. On the syntax and semantics of mirativity: Evidence from Spanish and Albanian. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Triantafyllides, Manolis. 1998. Dictionary of standard Modern Greek. Institute for Modern Greek Studies of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas. 2017. Mirative fronting in German: Experimental evidence. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 460–488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsavdaridou, Lemonia. 2020. Exploring mirativity in Modern Greek: Surprise in interaction. Athens: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens MA dissertation.
Tzartzanos, Achilles. 1996. Neoelliniki syntaksi (tis koinis dimotikis) [Modern Greek Syntax (of the demotic Koine)]. Thessaloniki: Kyriakides.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valetopoulos, Freiderikos & Eleni Motsiou. 2014. Peur et surprise: Définition et description [Φόβος και έκπληξη: Ορισμός και περιγραφή]. In 11th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, ICGL11, Selected Papers, 151–165. Rhodes: University of the Aegean, Department of Mediterranean Studies.
Watters, David E. 2004. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Tim Wharton. 2006. Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10). 1559–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeevat, Henk. 2009. “Only” as a mirative particle. In Arndt Riester & Edgar Onea (eds.), Focus at the syntax-semantics interface. Working Papers of the SFB 732(3). 121–141. University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Ke, Zhao Jia, Zhang Ming, Cui Qian & Xiaolan Fu. 2017. Neural responses to rapid facial expressions of fear and surprise. Frontiers in Psychology 81. 761. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ifantidou, Elly
2025. Relevance beyond the implicated proposition. Journal of Pragmatics 249 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue